IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpfi/9810002.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Using Value-at-Risk to Control Risk Taking: How Wrong Can you Be?

Author

Listed:
  • Xiongwei Ju

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

  • Neil D. Pearson

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Abstract

We study a source of bias in value-at-risk estimates that has not previously been recognized. Because value-at-risk estimates are based on past data, a trader will often have a good understanding of the errors in the value-at-risk estimate, and it will be possible for her to choose portfolios for which she knows that the value -at-risk is less than the "true" value at risk. Thus, The trader will be able to take on more market risk than risk limits based on value-at-risk permit. Biases can also arise if she doesn't have a good understanding of the errors, but uses the estimated covariance matrix to achieve certain portfolio objectives. We assess the magnitude of these biases for three different assumptions about the motivations and behavoir of the trader and find that in all cases, value-at-risk estimates are systematically downward biased. In some circumstances the biases can be very large. Our study of the distributions of the biases also suggests a way to adjust the estimates to "correct" the biases.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiongwei Ju & Neil D. Pearson, 1998. "Using Value-at-Risk to Control Risk Taking: How Wrong Can you Be?," Finance 9810002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpfi:9810002
    Note: Type of Document - PDF; prepared on pc; to print on HP; pages: 31; figures: included. Office for Futures and Options Research (OFOR)at University of Illinois at Ubana -Champaign. Working Paper 98-08. For a complete list of OFOR working papers see http://w3.ag.uiuc.edu/ACE/ofor
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/fin/papers/9810/9810002.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas J. Linsmeier & Neil D. Pearson, 1996. "Risk Measurement: An Introduction to Value at Risk," Finance 9609004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Paul H. Kupiec, 1995. "Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 95-24, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    3. Jose A. Lopez, 1996. "Regulatory Evaluation of Value-at-Risk Models," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 96-51, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    4. Darryll Hendricks, 1996. "Evaluation of value-at-risk models using historical data," Proceedings 512, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    5. Stephen Figlewski, 1997. "Forecasting Volatility," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 1-88, February.
    6. Linsmeier, Thomas J. & Pearson, Neil D., 1996. "Risk measurement: an introduction to value at risk," ACE Reports 14796, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics.
    7. Darryll Hendricks, 1996. "Evaluation of value-at-risk models using historical data," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 2(Apr), pages 39-69.
    8. Jon Danielsson, 1997. "Extreme Returns, Tail Estimation, and Value-at-Risk," FMG Discussion Papers dp273, Financial Markets Group.
    9. J. S. Butler & Barry Schachter, 1996. "Improving Value-At-Risk Estimates By Combining Kernel Estimation With Historical Simulation," Finance 9605001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. J. S. Butler & Barry Schachter, 1996. "Improving value-at-risk estimates by combining kernel estimation," Proceedings 513, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammed Bilal Girach & Shashank Oberoi & Siddhartha P. Chakrabarty, 2021. "Is Being “Robust” Beneficial? A Perspective from the Indian Market," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 28(4), pages 469-497, December.
    2. Philippe Jorion, 2007. "Bank Trading Risk and Systemic Risk," NBER Chapters, in: The Risks of Financial Institutions, pages 29-57, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Cornelis A Los, 2005. "Why VaR FailsLong Memory and Extreme Events in Financial Markets," The IUP Journal of Financial Economics, IUP Publications, vol. 0(3), pages 19-36, September.
    4. Belhajjam, A. & Belbachir, M. & El Ouardirhi, S., 2017. "Robust multivairiate extreme value at risk allocation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Mohammed Bilal Girach & Shashank Oberoi & Siddhartha P. Chakrabarty, 2019. "Is being `Robust' beneficial?: A perspective from the Indian market," Papers 1908.05002, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mei-Ling Tang & Trung K. Do, 2019. "In search of robust methods for multi-currency portfolio construction by value at risk," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 26(1), pages 107-126, March.
    2. Sharif Mozumder & Mohammad Zoynul Abedin & Raad Lalon & Amjad Hossain, 2024. "Which User-Friendly Model is the Best for BASEL-III? An Emerging Market Study," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(5), pages 3049-3086, November.
    3. Jose A. Lopez, 1996. "Regulatory Evaluation of Value-at-Risk Models," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 96-51, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    4. Mark R. Manfredo. & Raymond M. Leuthold, 1999. "Market Risk Measurement and the Cattle Feeding Margin: An Application of Value-at-Risk," Finance 9908002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Yass A. Alkafaji & Nauzer Balsara & Judith N. Aburmishan, 2006. "FASB’s Statement No. 133 on Derivatives and Barings Bank: The Case for Value at Risk (VAR)," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(2), pages 94-104, September.
    6. Rostagno, Luciano Martin, 2005. "Empirical tests of parametric and non-parametric Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) measures for the Brazilian stock market index," ISU General Staff Papers 2005010108000021878, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Carol Alexander & José María Sarabia, 2012. "Quantile Uncertainty and Value‐at‐Risk Model Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(8), pages 1293-1308, August.
    8. Azizpour, S & Giesecke, K. & Schwenkler, G., 2018. "Exploring the sources of default clustering," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 154-183.
    9. Jose A. Lopez, 1999. "Methods for evaluating value-at-risk estimates," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pages 3-17.
    10. Angelidis, Timotheos & Benos, Alexandros & Degiannakis, Stavros, 2004. "The Use of GARCH Models in VaR Estimation," MPRA Paper 96332, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Carol Alexander & Jose Maria Sarabia, 2010. "Endogenizing Model Risk to Quantile Estimates," ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2010-07, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    12. de Araújo, André da Silva & Garcia, Maria Teresa Medeiros, 2013. "Risk contagion in the north-western and southern European stock markets," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-34.
    13. Ryohei Kawata & Masaaki Kijima, 2007. "Value-at-risk in a market subject to regime switching," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(6), pages 609-619.
    14. Mehmet Sahiner & David G. McMillan & Dimos Kambouroudis, 2023. "Do artificial neural networks provide improved volatility forecasts: Evidence from Asian markets," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 47(3), pages 723-762, September.
    15. Stavroyiannis, S. & Makris, I. & Nikolaidis, V. & Zarangas, L., 2012. "Econometric modeling and value-at-risk using the Pearson type-IV distribution," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 10-17.
    16. Christophe HURLIN & Sessi TOKPAVI, 2007. "Une évaluation des procédures de Backtesting," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 1716, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    17. Halkos, George E. & Tsirivis, Apostolos S., 2019. "Value-at-risk methodologies for effective energy portfolio risk management," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 197-212.
    18. Pavol Krasnovský, 2015. "Estimating the Value-at-Risk from High-frequency Data," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(2), pages 5-11.
    19. Fabrizio Cipollini & Giampiero M. Gallo & Alessandro Palandri, 2023. "Modeling and evaluating conditional quantile dynamics in VaR forecasts," Papers 2305.20067, arXiv.org.
    20. Biswajit Patra & Puja Padhi, 2015. "Backtesting of Value at Risk Methodology: Analysis of Banking Shares in India," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 9(3), pages 254-277, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Value-at-Risk;

    JEL classification:

    • G - Financial Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpfi:9810002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EconWPA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.