IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uwa/wpaper/20-08.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Extending Edgeworth: Labour Exchange and Production

Author

Listed:
  • Michael McLure

    (Economics Discipline, Business School, University of Western Australia)

  • Aldo Montesano

    (Bocconi University)

Abstract

This study presents an account of the implicit’ treatment of production associated with Edgeworth’s illustration of Friday’s and Crusoe’s economic relationship and attempts to extend that illustration to incorporate production on an ‘explicit’ basis. It reflects on Edgeworth’s famous Figure 1 from mathematical Psychics and what the shape of Friday’s and Crusoe’s indifference curves would be, when mapped in an allocation plane, if the production of wheat implied by the Friday-Crusoe scenario is treated as merely ‘incidental’, in which case production is ignored, and if it is treated as ‘intentional’. Based on that reflection, Edgeworth’s figure is extended to explicitly illustrate how the exchange of Friday’s labour to Crusoe for remuneration influences, and is influenced by, Friday’s production of wheat for Crusoe. The extension to Edgeworth’s illustration has been undertaken for two cases: first, the simplified and unrealistic, although theoretically useful, case that sets aside Crusoe’s initial stock of wheat; and second, the more realistic but more complex case that incorporates Crusoe’s initial stock of wheat.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael McLure & Aldo Montesano, 2020. "Extending Edgeworth: Labour Exchange and Production," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 20-08, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwa:wpaper:20-08
    Note: MD5 = f4b7dec5ccbc4fb4559f26fff31a07c5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecompapers.biz.uwa.edu.au/paper/PDF%20of%20Discussion%20Papers/2020/DP%2020.08_McLure%20and%20Montesano.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael McLure & Aldo Montesano, 2019. "Thinking Outside the Box: Edgeworth, Pareto and the Early History of the Box Diagram," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 95(310), pages 301-311, September.
    2. John Creedy, 1980. "Some Recent Interpretations of Mathematical Psychics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 267-276, Summer.
    3. Vincent J. Tarascio, 1980. "Some Recent Interpretations of Mathematical Psychics: a Reply," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 277-281, Summer.
    4. Morgan,Mary S., 2012. "The World in the Model," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107002975, January.
    5. Morgan,Mary S., 2012. "The World in the Model," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521176194, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arthur Brackmann Netto, 2017. "The Double Edge of Case-Studies: A Frame-Based Definition of Economic Models," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2017_21, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    2. Peter Rodenburg, 2016. "How Full is Full Employment?How Tools and Not Theory Explained Full Employment," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 5-25.
    3. Morgan, Mary S., 2020. "Inducing visibility and visual deduction," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103540, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Dorin, Bruno & Joly, Pierre-Benoît, 2020. "Modelling world agriculture as a learning machine? From mainstream models to Agribiom 1.0," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Sachie Mizohata & Raynald Jadoul, 2013. "Towards International and Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration for the Measurements of Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 683-708, May.
    6. Gene Callahan & Andreas Hoffmann, 2017. "Two-Population Social Cycle Theories," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Including a Symposium on New Directions in Sraffa Scholarship, volume 35, pages 303-321, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    7. Ramzi Mabsout, 2018. "The Backward Induction Controversy as a Metaphorical Problem," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 7(1), pages 24-49, March.
    8. Khamdamov, T., 2022. "A brief overview of the evolution of computer simulations in economic research," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 189-207.
    9. Łukasz Hard, 2014. "Models of Mechanisms and their Role in Building Economic Explanations," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 37.
    10. Judy L Klein, 2015. "The Cold War Hot House for Modeling Strategies at the Carnegie Institute of Technology," Working Papers Series 19, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    11. Nicolas Brisset, 2018. "Models as speech acts: the telling case of financial models," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 21-41, January.
    12. Ryan Rumble & Vincent Mangematin, 2015. "Business Model Implementation: The Antecedents of Multi-Sidedness," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01183388, HAL.
    13. Nicola Giocoli, 2016. "Truth or precision? Some reflections on the economists’ failure to predict the financial crisis," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 29(4), pages 371-386, December.
    14. Charles Baden-Fuller & Vincent Mangematin, 2015. "Business Models and Modelling Business Models," Post-Print hal-01183386, HAL.
    15. Asad Zaman & Taseer Salahuddin, 2020. "Models and Reality: How Did Models Divorced from Reality Become Epistemologically Acceptable?," International Econometric Review (IER), Econometric Research Association, vol. 12(1), pages 50-74, April.
    16. Philipp Robinson Rössner, 2019. "Martin Luther and the making of the modern economic mind," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(3), pages 233-248, September.
    17. Mohammad Hajigholizadeh & Assefa M. Melesse & Hector R. Fuentes, 2018. "Erosion and Sediment Transport Modelling in Shallow Waters: A Review on Approaches, Models and Applications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
    18. John Rust, 2014. "The Limits of Inference with Theory: A Review of Wolpin (2013)," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(3), pages 820-850, September.
    19. Mielke, Jahel & Steudle, Gesine A., 2018. "Green Investment and Coordination Failure: An Investors' Perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 88-95.
    20. Dieter Bögenhold, 2017. "Social-scienciation of Economics and its Consequences: On a Relative Convergence between Economics and Sociology," STOREPapers 3_2017, Associazione Italiana per la Storia dell'Economia Politica - StorEP.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Box diagram; Edgeworth; Exchange; Indifference; Production;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B13 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian)
    • D51 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Exchange and Production Economies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwa:wpaper:20-08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sam Tang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuwaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.