IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/upf/upfgen/753.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Location models for ceding market share and shrinking services

Author

Listed:

Abstract

New location models are presented here for exploring the reduction of facilities in a region. The first of these models considers firms ceding market share to competitors under situations of financial exigency. The goal of this model is to cede the least market share, i.e., retain as much of the customer base as possible while shedding costly outlets. The second model considers a firm essentially without competition that must shrink it services for economic reasons. This firm is assumed to close outlets so that the degradation of service is limited. An example is offered within a competitive environment to demonstrate the usefulness of this modeling approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles ReVelle & Alan T. Murray & Daniel Serra, 2004. "Location models for ceding market share and shrinking services," Economics Working Papers 753, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    • Handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/753.pdf
    File Function: Whole Paper
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klincewicz, John G. & Luss, Hanan & Yu, Chang-Sung, 1988. "A large-scale multilocation capacity planning model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 178-190, March.
    2. Melachrinoudis, Emanuel & Min, Hokey, 2000. "The dynamic relocation and phase-out of a hybrid, two-echelon plant/warehousing facility: A multiple objective approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Weston, Frederick C., 1982. "Optimal configuration of telephone answering sites in a service industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 395-405, August.
    4. Richard Church & Charles R. Velle, 1974. "The Maximal Covering Location Problem," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 101-118, January.
    5. ReVelle, Charles, 1993. "Facility siting and integer-friendly programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 147-158, March.
    6. Vladimir Marianov & Daniel Serra, 2004. "Location models in the public sector," Economics Working Papers 755, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruno, Giuseppe & Esposito, Emilio & Genovese, Andrea & Piccolo, Carmela, 2016. "Institutions and facility mergers in the Italian education system: Models and case studies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 23-32.
    2. Diego Ruiz-Hernández & Javier Elizalde & David Delgado-Gómez, 2017. "Cournot–Stackelberg games in competitive delocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 149-170, September.
    3. Zaharudin, Zati Aqmar & Brint, Andrew & Genovese, Andrea, 2022. "A multi-period model for reorganising urban household waste recycling networks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Bell, John E. & Griffis, Stanley E. & Cunningham III, William A. & Eberlan, Jon A., 2011. "Location optimization of strategic alert sites for homeland defense," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 151-158, April.
    5. Gohram Baloch & Fatma Gzara, 2020. "Strategic Network Design for Parcel Delivery with Drones Under Competition," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 204-228, January.
    6. Pelegrín, Blas & Fernández, Pascual & Dolores García Pérez, María & Cano Hernández, Saúl, 2012. "On the location of new facilities for chain expansion under delivered pricing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 149-158, April.
    7. Mayadunne, Sanjaya & Johar, Monica & Saydam, Cem, 2018. "Competitive store closing during an economic downturn," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 162-178.
    8. María Sierra-Paradinas & Antonio Alonso-Ayuso & Francisco Javier Martín-Campo & Francisco Rodríguez-Calo & Enrique Lasso, 2020. "Facilities Delocation in the Retail Sector: A Mixed 0-1 Nonlinear Optimization Model and Its Linear Reformulation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Diego Ruiz-Hernández & David Delgado-Gómez, 2016. "The stochastic capacitated branch restructuring problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 77-100, November.
    10. Haase, Knut & Müller, Sven, 2013. "Management of school locations allowing for free school choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 847-855.
    11. Bieniek, Milena, 2015. "A note on the facility location problem with stochastic demands," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 53-60.
    12. Murray, Alan T., 2021. "Contemporary optimization application through geographic information systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. M. Serkan Akturk & Michael Ketzenberg, 2022. "Impact of Competitor Store Closures on a Major Retailer," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 715-730, February.
    14. Pludow, B. Amelia & Murray, Alan T. & Church, Richard L., 2022. "Service quality modeling to support optimizing facility location in a microscale environment," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    15. Guerriero, Francesca & Miglionico, Giovanna & Olivito, Filomena, 2016. "Location and reorganization problems: The Calabrian health care system case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 939-954.
    16. Rezapour, Shabnam & Hassani, Ashkan & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani, 2015. "Concurrent design of product family and supply chain network considering quality and price," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 18-35.
    17. Eric Delmelle & Jean-Claude Thill & Dominique Peeters & Isabelle Thomas, 2014. "A multi-period capacitated school location problem with modular equipment and closest assignment considerations," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 263-286, July.
    18. Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Dullaert, Wout & De Borger, Bruno, 2014. "Designing a new supply chain for competition against an existing supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 124-140.
    19. Haase, Knut & Hoppe, Mirko, 2008. "Standortplanung unter Wettbewerb - Teil 1: Grundlagen," Discussion Papers 2/2008, Technische Universität Dresden, "Friedrich List" Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, Institute of Transport and Economics.
    20. Bruno, Giuseppe & Diglio, Antonio & Piccolo, Carmela & Cannavacciuolo, Lorella, 2019. "Territorial reorganization of regional blood management systems: Evidences from an Italian case study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 54-70.
    21. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    22. Overholts II, Dale L. & Bell, John E. & Arostegui, Marvin A., 2009. "A location analysis approach for military maintenance scheduling with geographically dispersed service areas," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 838-852, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Jing & Murray, Alan T. & Church, Richard L. & Wei, Ran, 2023. "Service allocation equity in location coverage analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 21-37.
    2. Cordeau, Jean-François & Furini, Fabio & Ljubić, Ivana, 2019. "Benders decomposition for very large scale partial set covering and maximal covering location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 882-896.
    3. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner, 2019. "Cooperative Cover of Uniform Demand," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 819-831, September.
    4. Alan T. Murray, 2016. "Maximal Coverage Location Problem," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 39(1), pages 5-27, January.
    5. Huizhu Wang & Jianqin Zhou, 2023. "Location of Railway Emergency Rescue Spots Based on a Near-Full Covering Problem: From a Perspective of Diverse Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Plastria, F., 2012. "A note towards improved homeland defense," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 244-248, April.
    7. Eliş, Haluk & Tansel, Barbaros & Oğuz, Osman & Güney, Mesut & Kian, Ramez, 2021. "On guarding real terrains: The terrain guarding and the blocking path problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Li, Xin & Pan, Yanchun & Jiang, Shiqiang & Huang, Qiang & Chen, Zhimin & Zhang, Mingxia & Zhang, Zuoyao, 2021. "Locate vaccination stations considering travel distance, operational cost, and work schedule," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Marianov, Vladimir & Serra, Daniel, 2001. "Hierarchical location-allocation models for congested systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 195-208, November.
    10. Mehdi Ansari & Juan S. Borrero & Leonardo Lozano, 2023. "Robust Minimum-Cost Flow Problems Under Multiple Ripple Effect Disruptions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 83-103, January.
    11. Hamid Mousavi & Soroush Avakh Darestani & Parham Azimi, 2021. "An artificial neural network based mathematical model for a stochastic health care facility location problem," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 499-514, September.
    12. Jiwon Baik & Alan T. Murray, 2022. "Locating a facility to simultaneously address access and coverage goals," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(5), pages 1199-1217, October.
    13. Chen, Liang & Chen, Sheng-Jie & Chen, Wei-Kun & Dai, Yu-Hong & Quan, Tao & Chen, Juan, 2023. "Efficient presolving methods for solving maximal covering and partial set covering location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(1), pages 73-87.
    14. Ospina, Juan P. & Duque, Juan C. & Botero-Fernández, Verónica & Montoya, Alejandro, 2022. "The maximal covering bicycle network design problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 222-236.
    15. Fadda, Edoardo & Manerba, Daniele & Cabodi, Gianpiero & Camurati, Paolo Enrico & Tadei, Roberto, 2021. "Comparative analysis of models and performance indicators for optimal service facility location," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Harkness, Joseph & ReVelle, Charles, 2003. "Facility location with increasing production costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Arana-Jiménez, Manuel & Blanco, Víctor & Fernández, Elena, 2020. "On the fuzzy maximal covering location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 692-705.
    18. Sadeghi, Mohammad & Yaghoubi, Saeed, 2024. "Optimization models for cloud seeding network design and operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 1146-1167.
    19. Stephanie A. Snyder & Robert G. Haight, 2016. "Application of the Maximal Covering Location Problem to Habitat Reserve Site Selection," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 39(1), pages 28-47, January.
    20. Erhan Erkut & Armann Ingolfsson & Güneş Erdoğan, 2008. "Ambulance location for maximum survival," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(1), pages 42-58, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    De-location; shrinkage; covering models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • J80 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econ.upf.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.