IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v53y2016icp23-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutions and facility mergers in the Italian education system: Models and case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno, Giuseppe
  • Esposito, Emilio
  • Genovese, Andrea
  • Piccolo, Carmela

Abstract

In recent years, across Europe, the economic crisis has resulted in an increased pressure on education systems. Notably, Italy has been one of the countries that has experienced the most severe reduction in public expenditure in the education sector. In the described conditions, Italian governmental institutions have started to perform rationalisation actions, aimed at modifying the current configuration of the existing facilities offering educational services (either by entirely closing and merging some of them, or by downsizing or transferring capacities), in order to increase the affordability of the system while still providing a required minimum service level. These strategic choices may have a lasting impact; therefore, there is a need for appropriate decision support tools capable of assisting planners. For this reason, after a description of the context and a review of the current literature, this paper presents two novel mathematical models for addressing rationalisation decisions in the Italian education system. The usability of such models is tested by means of real-world case studies, offering interesting insights.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno, Giuseppe & Esposito, Emilio & Genovese, Andrea & Piccolo, Carmela, 2016. "Institutions and facility mergers in the Italian education system: Models and case studies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 23-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:53:y:2016:i:c:p:23-32
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2015.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012115000592
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2015.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ReVelle, Charles & Murray, Alan T. & Serra, Daniel, 2007. "Location models for ceding market share and shrinking services," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 533-540, October.
    2. Charles A. Holloway & Donald A. Wehrung & Michael P. Zeitlin & Rosser T. Nelson, 1975. "An Interactive Procedure for the School Boundary Problem with Declining Enrollment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 191-206, April.
    3. Lawrence Joseph & Michael Kuby, 2011. "Gravity Modeling and its Impacts on Location Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: H. A. Eiselt & Vladimir Marianov (ed.), Foundations of Location Analysis, chapter 0, pages 423-443, Springer.
    4. Lemberg, David S. & Church, Richard L., 2000. "The school boundary stability problem over time," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 159-176, September.
    5. Ploughman, T. & Darnton, W. & Heuser, W., 1968. "An assignment program to establish school attendance boundaries and forecast construction needs," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 243-258, July.
    6. Aros-Vera, Felipe & Marianov, Vladimir & Mitchell, John E., 2013. "p-Hub approach for the optimal park-and-ride facility location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 277-285.
    7. Giuseppe Bruno & Andrea Genovese, 2012. "A Spatial Interaction Model for the Representation of the Mobility of University Students on the Italian Territory," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 41-57, March.
    8. Peter J. B. Brown, 1987. "Trade‐Off And Compromise In Secondary School Reorganisation Schemes: A Goal Programming Approach," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 115-130, January.
    9. F Caro & T Shirabe & M Guignard & A Weintraub, 2004. "School redistricting: embedding GIS tools with integer programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(8), pages 836-849, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Bruno & Manuel Cavola & Antonio Diglio & Carmela Piccolo, 2022. "Geographical accessibility to upper secondary education: an Italian regional case study," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(2), pages 511-536, October.
    2. De la Cruz, Marco & Mergoni, Anna, 2024. "Assessing the performance of Peruvian education system from a governance perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Antonio Diglio & Stefan Nickel & Francisco Saldanha-da-Gama, 2020. "Towards a stochastic programming modeling framework for districting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 249-285, September.
    4. Mayerle, Sérgio F. & Rodrigues, Hidelbrando F. & Neiva de Figueiredo, João & De Genaro Chiroli, Daiane M., 2022. "Optimal student/school/class/teacher/classroom matching to support efficient public school system resource allocation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Bruno, Giuseppe & Diglio, Antonio & Piccolo, Carmela & Cannavacciuolo, Lorella, 2019. "Territorial reorganization of regional blood management systems: Evidences from an Italian case study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 54-70.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sven Müller & Knut Haase & Sascha Kless, 2009. "A Multiperiod School Location Planning Approach with Free School Choice," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(12), pages 2929-2945, December.
    2. F Caro & T Shirabe & M Guignard & A Weintraub, 2004. "School redistricting: embedding GIS tools with integer programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(8), pages 836-849, August.
    3. Eric Delmelle & Jean-Claude Thill & Dominique Peeters & Isabelle Thomas, 2014. "A multi-period capacitated school location problem with modular equipment and closest assignment considerations," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 263-286, July.
    4. Murray, Alan T., 2016. "Assessing the impacts of traditional school year calendar start dates," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 28-36.
    5. Zaharudin, Zati Aqmar & Brint, Andrew & Genovese, Andrea, 2022. "A multi-period model for reorganising urban household waste recycling networks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Wei, Ran & Feng, Xin & Rey, Sergio & Knaap, Elijah, 2022. "Reducing racial segregation of public school districts," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Mayerle, Sérgio F. & Rodrigues, Hidelbrando F. & Neiva de Figueiredo, João & De Genaro Chiroli, Daiane M., 2022. "Optimal student/school/class/teacher/classroom matching to support efficient public school system resource allocation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Bouzarth, Elizabeth L. & Forrester, Richard & Hutson, Kevin R. & Reddoch, Lattie, 2018. "Assigning students to schools to minimize both transportation costs and socioeconomic variation between schools," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Haase, Knut & Müller, Sven, 2013. "Management of school locations allowing for free school choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 847-855.
    10. Liao, Cong & Scheuer, Bronte & Dai, Teqi & Tian, Yuan, 2020. "Optimizing the spatial assignment of schools to reduce both inequality of educational opportunity and potential opposition rate through introducing random mechanism into proximity-based system," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Freire, Alexandre S. & Moreno, Eduardo & Yushimito, Wilfredo F., 2016. "A branch-and-bound algorithm for the maximum capture problem with random utilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 204-212.
    12. Lin, Yun Hui & Wang, Yuan & He, Dongdong & Lee, Loo Hay, 2020. "Last-mile delivery: Optimal locker location under multinomial logit choice model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    13. Jairo Ortega & János Tóth & Tamás Péter & Sarbast Moslem, 2020. "An Integrated Model of Park-And-Ride Facilities for Sustainable Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Amy Cohn & Michael Magazine & George Polak, 2009. "Rank‐Cluster‐and‐Prune: An algorithm for generating clusters in complex set partitioning problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(3), pages 215-225, April.
    15. Overholts II, Dale L. & Bell, John E. & Arostegui, Marvin A., 2009. "A location analysis approach for military maintenance scheduling with geographically dispersed service areas," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 838-852, August.
    16. Teixeira, Joao C. & Antunes, Antonio P., 2008. "A hierarchical location model for public facility planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 92-104, February.
    17. S. Bacci & B. Bertaccini, 2021. "Assessment of the University Reputation Through the Analysis of the Student Mobility," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 363-388, August.
    18. Murray, Alan T., 2021. "Contemporary optimization application through geographic information systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Songyot Kitthamkesorn & Anthony Chen & Sathaporn Opasanon & Suwicha Jaita, 2021. "A P-Hub Location Problem for Determining Park-and-Ride Facility Locations with the Weibit-Based Choice Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Méndez-Vogel, Gonzalo & Marianov, Vladimir & Lüer-Villagra, Armin & Eiselt, H.A., 2023. "Store location with multipurpose shopping trips and a new random utility customers’ choice model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 708-721.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:53:y:2016:i:c:p:23-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.