IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unm/unuint/199514.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Implications of New Organizational Techniques for Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Kaplinsky, Raphael

    (Institute for Development Studies, University of Sussex)

Abstract

The paper examines the nature of the changes occurring in industrial organisation in the 1990s and the experience of developing countries (LDCs) in adopting the emerging form of organisation or 'mass customisation'. These changes include a drive towards product heterogeneity and innovation, and enhanced levels of product quality without sacrificing price competitiveness; the use of flexible machinery, often involving electronics-based automation technologies; the introduction of new forms of work organisation involving teamwork, the multi-directional flow of information, and delaying of managerial hierarchies; the search for firm economies of scope; and the pursuit of 'systemic optimisation' in efficiency, involving closer horizontal and vertical ties and collaboration between firms. It finds that only a few leading firms in LDCs have been successful to any degree in adopting the new form of industrial organisation; most firms continue to produce under traditional forms of industrial organisation. The study accounts for these results by noting the lack of necessary educational and training levels (although significant advances could be achieved even with existing levels), poor supplier capability and physical infrastructure, and lack of managerial commitment to change due to family ownership and outdated management training. The paper recommends government intervention in the supply and demand of the new industrial organisation through awareness and pilot schemes, visits to successful firms, financing, introduction of relevant educational and training programmes and the promotion of appropriate consulting services. Governments should also provide a stable macro-economic environment for firms to adopt 'mass customisation' and should operate at both the national and the local level.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaplinsky, Raphael, 1995. "The Implications of New Organizational Techniques for Developing Countries," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1995-14, United Nations University - INTECH.
  • Handle: RePEc:unm:unuint:199514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/discussion-papers/9514.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rabellotti, Roberta, 1995. "Is there an "industrial district model"? Footwear districts in Italy and Mexico compared," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 29-41, January.
    2. Kenneth Arrow, 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 609-626, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Syrquin, M. & Chenery, H.B., 1989. "Patterns Of Development, 1950 To 1983," World Bank - Discussion Papers 41, World Bank.
    4. Humphrey, John, 1995. "Industrial reorganization in developing countries: From models to trajectories," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 149-162, January.
    5. Jorge Carrillo, V., 1995. "Flexible production in the auto sector: Industrial reorganization at Ford-Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 87-101, January.
    6. Kirmani, S.S. & Baum, W.C., 1992. "The Consulting Profession in Developing Countries," World Bank - Discussion Papers 149, World Bank.
    7. Kaplinsky, Raphael, 1995. "Technique and system: The spread of Japanese management techniques to developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 57-71, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cooper, Charles, 1995. "Technology, Manufactured Exports and Competitiveness," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1995-13, United Nations University - INTECH.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mefford, Robert N. & Bruun, Peter, 1998. "Transferring world class production to developing countries: A strategic model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 433-450, September.
    2. Kuramoto, Juana R., 2000. "Las aglomeraciones productivas alrededor de la minería: el caso de la Minera Yanacocha, SA," Desarrollo Productivo 4670, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Kuramoto, Juana R., 1999. "Las aglomeraciones productivas alrededor de la minería: el caso de la Minera Yanacocha S.A," Working Papers 37814, Group for the Analysis of Development (GRADE).
    4. Kaplinsky, Raphael, 1997. "India's industrial development: An interpretative survey," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 681-694, May.
    5. Fujita, Mai, 2013. "The Japanese and Chinese models of industrial organisation : fighting for supremacy in the Vietnamese motorcycle industry," IDE Discussion Papers 420, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    6. Alcorta, Ludovico, 1995. "New Technologies, Scale and Scope, and Location of Production in Developing Countries," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1995-02, United Nations University - INTECH.
    7. Humphrey, John & Schmitz, Hubert, 1996. "The Triple C approach to local industrial policy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(12), pages 1859-1877, December.
    8. Harvie, Charles & Lee, Boon-Chye, 2003. "Public Policy and Small and Medium Enterprise Development," Economics Working Papers wp03-18, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    9. Gomez, Georgina M. & Helmsing, A.H.J., 2008. "Selective Spatial Closure and Local Economic Development: What Do We Learn from the Argentine Local Currency Systems?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2489-2511, November.
    10. Sakakibara, Mariko, 1997. "Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 447-473, December.
    11. Gersbach, Hans & Schneider, Maik & Schneller, Olivier, 2010. "Optimal Mix of Applied and Basic Research, Distance to Frontier, and Openness," CEPR Discussion Papers 7795, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Dirk Czarnitzki & Hanna Hottenrott & Susanne Thorwarth, 2011. "Industrial research versus development investment: the implications of financial constraints," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 35(3), pages 527-544.
    13. Ali-Yrkkö, Jyrki, 2004. "Impact of Public R&D Financing on Private R&D - Does Financial Constraint Matter?," Discussion Papers 943, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    14. Gulyani, Sumila, 2001. "Effects of Poor Transportation on Lean Production and Industrial Clustering: Evidence from the Indian Auto Industry," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 1157-1177, July.
    15. Jarle Moen, 2005. "Is Mobility of Technical Personnel a Source of R&D Spillovers?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 23(1), pages 81-114, January.
    16. Hans K. Hvide & Benjamin F. Jones, 2018. "University Innovation and the Professor's Privilege," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(7), pages 1860-1898, July.
    17. Persson, Bo, 2008. "The Development of a New Swedish Innovation Policy A Historical Institutional Approach," Papers in Innovation Studies 2008/2, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    18. Aiello, Francesco & Albanese, Giuseppe & Piselli, Paolo, 2019. "Good value for public money? The case of R&D policy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1057-1076.
    19. Inglesi-Lotz, Roula, 2017. "Social rate of return to R&D on various energy technologies: Where should we invest more? A study of G7 countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 521-525.
    20. Thomas Bolli & Martin Woerter, 2013. "Technological Diversification and Innovation Performance," KOF Working papers 13-336, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unm:unuint:199514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ad Notten (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/meritnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.