IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sol/wpaper/2013-95375.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Changement et management :une analyse de deux organisations publiques en France et en Belgique

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Mattijs
  • Jean-Jacques Viala

Abstract

La mise en œuvre de réformes des administrations publiques, et plus spécifiquement le changement organisationnel, se heurtent à des obstacles récurrents. On peut pourtant identifier dans le secteur public des organisations qui prétendent avoir fait aboutir des changements importants et revendiquent certains succès objectifs. Le présent article, en rapprochant deux de ces organisations – l’une en France, l’autre en Belgique, confirme les trois hypothèses suivantes: il y a des changements importants observables dans l’organisation, les prestations et la culture des organisations étudiées, mais il reste problématique de parler de succès à long terme; le changement résulte d’un travail de traduction et d’adaptation d’outils de gestion entre autres, travail méticuleux et long fait par des acteurs qui développent des intérêts communs et mobilisent des compétences particulières pour le réaliser; ce processus débouche sur une intégration très étroite du management dans les modes de fonctionnement des organisations qui à son tour remet en question la généralité des « leçons » qui peuvent en être tirées. Autrement dit, le mode d’adaptation du « management », voire de telle ou telle méthode, est à réinventer à chaque fois.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Mattijs & Jean-Jacques Viala, 2011. "Changement et management :une analyse de deux organisations publiques en France et en Belgique," Working Papers CEB 11-031, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    • Handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/95375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/95375/1/wp11031.pdf
    File Function: wp11031
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13775 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Yves Levant & Simon Alcouffe & Nicolas Berland, 2008. "Actor-networks and the diffusion of management accounting innovations : a comparative study," Post-Print hal-01682216, HAL.
    3. Pettigrew, Andrew M., 1997. "What is a processual analysis?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 337-348, December.
    4. Chris McLean & John Hassard, 2004. "Symmetrical Absence/Symmetrical Absurdity: Critical Notes on the Production of Actor‐Network Accounts," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 493-519, May.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1094 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Oscar Huerta Melchor, 2008. "Managing Change in OECD Governments: An Introductory Framework," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 12, OECD Publishing.
    7. Orton, James Douglas, 1997. "From inductive to iterative grounded theory: Zipping the gap between process theory and process data," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 419-438, December.
    8. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Dreveton & Sébastien Rocher, 2009. "The success story of a ‘successful?' management device," Post-Print halshs-00479810, HAL.
    2. Olga Mikhailova & Per Ingvar Olsen, 2016. "Internationalization of an academic invention through successive science-business networks: The case of TAVI," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 441-471, September.
    3. Maran, Laura & Bracci, Enrico & Inglis, Robert, 2018. "Performance management systems' stability: Unfolding the human factor – A case from the Italian public sector," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 324-339.
    4. Paula Jarzabkowski, 2003. "Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 23-55, January.
    5. Arnaboldi, Michela & Azzone, Giovanni, 2010. "Constructing performance measurement in the public sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 266-282.
    6. Wæraas , Arild & Agger Nielsen, Jeppe, 2015. "Translation Theory ‘Translated’: Three Perspectives on Translation in Organizational Research," Working Paper Series 16-2015, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business.
    7. Jean-Philippe Denis & Frank Tannery, 2002. "L'architecture des systèmes de contrôle de la stratégie dans les groupes," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 5(3), pages 69-114, September.
    8. Chen, Ping-Chuan & Hung, Shiu-Wan, 2016. "An actor-network perspective on evaluating the R&D linking efficiency of innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 303-312.
    9. Dietrich Budäus & Dennis Hilgers, 2009. "Reform des öffentlichen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesens in Deutschland," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 377-396, January.
    10. Dixon, Keith, 2009. "Calculative practices in higher education: a retrospective analysis of curricular accounting about learning," MPRA Paper 18295, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Kemmerling, Achim & Bruttel, Oliver, 2005. "New politics in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2005-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    12. Åkerman, Maria & Kilpiö, Aino & Peltola, Taru, 2010. "Institutional change from the margins of natural resource use: The emergence of small-scale bioenergy production within industrial forestry in Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 181-188, March.
    13. Hélène Laurell & Leona Achtenhagen & Svante Andersson, 2017. "The changing role of network ties and critical capabilities in an international new venture’s early development," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 113-140, March.
    14. Per Engelseth & Richard Glavee-Geo & Artur Janusz & Enoch Niboi, 2020. "The Emergent Nature of Networked Sustainable Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Sally Maitlis & Thomas B. Lawrence, 2003. "Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark: Understanding Failure in Organizational Strategizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 109-139, January.
    16. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    17. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    18. Jean-Luc Heeb & Véronique Haberey-Knuessi, 2014. "Health Professionals Facing Burnout: What Do We Know about Nursing Managers?," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-7, April.
    19. Nii Antiaye Addy & Arash Shaban-Nejad & David L. Buckeridge & Laurette Dubé, 2015. "An Innovative Approach to Addressing Childhood Obesity: A Knowledge-Based Infrastructure for Supporting Multi-Stakeholder Partnership Decision-Making in Quebec, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Frans Prenkert, 2012. "Business Network Simulation: Combining Research Cases and Agent-Based Models in a Robust Methodology," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(6), pages 82-92, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/95375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.