IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rom/km2019/1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutionalism, Neo-Institutionalism And Knowledge In International Regimes And Social Sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Teodor FRUNZETI

    ("Titu Maiorescu" University Academy of Romanian Scientists)

  • Lisa-Maria ACHIMESCU

    ("CAROL I" National Defense University)

Abstract

The concept institutionalism, that of neo-institutionalism and the evolution of the concept of regime became a subject of real interest both in Europe and internationally. Nevertheless, some doctrinarians do not approve this tendency, claiming that many of neo-institutionalism and regime theories represent only the reframing of the political issues previously analyzed and demonstrated by political scientists. Emphasizing the case of contemporary policy and regime analysis, we conclude that things are in a continuous evolution and development. All new created doctrines theories are challenged by similar problems, regardless of their national framework, and all new solutions envisaged stem from a common theoretical foundation. In this regard, the article explores the methodological contribution of institutionalism, neo-institutionalism and regime theories, as intrinsic part of the evolution of historical institutionalism - social entrenchment, role of rules and norms, genealogical and structural functionalism approach, critical realism - in the heuristic sense of knowledge paradigms, usually attributed to standard international norms and regimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Teodor FRUNZETI & Lisa-Maria ACHIMESCU, 2019. "Institutionalism, Neo-Institutionalism And Knowledge In International Regimes And Social Sciences," Proceedings of the 11-th International Conference on Knowledge Management: Projects, Systems and Technologies, Bucharest, November 7-8, 2019. 1, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, Academy of Economic Studies from Bucharest and "Carol I-st" National Defence University, Department for Management of the Defence Resources and Education.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:km2019:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccasp.ase.ro/KM2019/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keeley, James F., 1990. "Toward a Foucauldian analysis of international regimes," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 83-105, January.
    2. John B. Davis & D. W. Hands & Uskali Mäki (ed.), 1998. "The Handbook of Economic Methodology," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 741.
    3. Hartmut Kliemt, 2017. "ABC – Austria, Bloomington, Chicago: Political Economy the Ostrom Way," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: The Austrian and Bloomington Schools of Political Economy, volume 22, pages 1-33, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    4. Haggard, Stephan & Simmons, Beth A., 1987. "Theories of international regimes," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(3), pages 491-517, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yefimov, Vladimir, 2009. "Comparative historical institutional analysis of German, English and American economics," MPRA Paper 48173, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2011. "Economic Models as Analogies," PIER Working Paper Archive 12-001, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    3. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:25-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2014. "A Model of Modeling," PIER Working Paper Archive 14-026, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    5. N. Emrah Aydinonat, 2000. "Invisible Hand Explanations: the Case of Menger's Explanation of the 'Origin of Money'," Method and Hist of Econ Thought 0004001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Morten Søberg, 2002. "The Duhem-Quine thesis and experimental economics. A reinterpretation," Discussion Papers 329, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    7. John Hart, 2001. "A conversation with Terence Hutchison," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 359-377.
    8. Sutiono∗, 2018. "Dynamic Equilibrium as Indonesia’s Defense Diplomacy Geo-Strategy to Address China-Us Sphere Of Influence Dualism in ASEAN," International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh, vol. 4(4), pages 186-193.
    9. Marc L. Busch & Eric R. Reinhardt, 1993. "Nice Strategies in a World of Relative Gains," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(3), pages 427-445, September.
    10. Jérôme Lallement & Amanar Akhabbar, 2011. "Appliquer la théorie économique de l'équilibre général : de Walras à Leontief," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00609684, HAL.
    11. Dorian Jullien, 2018. "Under Risk, Over Time, Regarding Other People: Language and Rationality within Three Dimensions," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Including a Symposium on Latin American Monetary Thought: Two Centuries in Search of Originality, volume 36, pages 119-155, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    12. Sheila C. Dow, 1999. "Post Keynesianism and Critical Realism: What Is the Connection?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 15-33, September.
    13. Vladiir Yefimov, 2015. "Two Disputes Of Methods, Three Constructivisms, And Three Liberalisms. Part I," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 29-38.
    14. Yefimov, V. M., 2015. "Two Disputes of Methods Three Constructivisms and Three Liberalisms. Part I," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 1(1), pages 24-33.
    15. Jennifer Dirmeyer, 2010. "The Power of Ideas: The "Peter Boettke" Strategy for Advancing the Science of Prosperity," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 26(Fall 2010), pages 117-124.
    16. Christopher L. Gilbert & Duo Qin, 2005. "The First Fifty Years of Modern Econometrics," Working Papers 544, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    17. Francesco Guala & Andrea Salanti, 2002. "Model-robustness in ‘old’ and ‘new’ growth theory," Working Papers (-2012) 0201, University of Bergamo, Department of Economics.
    18. Łukasz Hard, 2014. "Models of Mechanisms and their Role in Building Economic Explanations," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 37.
    19. Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 2003. "The microfoundations of macroeconomics: an evolutionary perspective," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 27(1), pages 65-84, January.
    20. Siebert, Horst, 1995. "Ein Regelwerk für eine zusammenwachsende Welt," Kiel Discussion Papers 251, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    21. Oliver Westerwinter & Kenneth W. Abbott & Thomas Biersteker, 2021. "Informal governance in world politics," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:km2019:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mogos Radu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.