IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/ewikln/2020_004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating Long-Term Global Supply Costs for Low-Carbon Hydrogen

Author

Listed:
  • Brändle, Gregor

    (Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI))

  • Schönfisch, Max

    (Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI))

  • Schulte, Simon

    (Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI))

Abstract

As part of the decarbonisation of the global economy, low-carbon hydrogen is expected to play a central role in future energy systems. This article presents a comprehensive approach for estimating the development of global production and supply costs of low-carbon hydrogen from renewable energy sources (RES) and natural gas until 2050. For hydrogen from RES, globally distributed wind and solar photovoltaics (PV) potentials are taken as inputs for low or high temperature electrolysers. A linear optimisation model minimises hydrogen production costs by determining optimal capacity ratios for each RES and electrolyser combination, based on hourly RES electricity generation profiles. For low-carbon hydrogen from natural gas, natural gas reforming with carbon capture and storage (CCS) and pyrolysis are considered. In addition to production costs, this analysis assesses the costs associated with the transportation of hydrogen by ship or pipeline. The combination of production and transportation costs yields a ranking of cost-optimal supply sources for individual countries. Estimation results suggest that natural gas reforming with CCS will be the most cost-efficient low-carbon hydrogen production pathway in the medium term (2020-2030). Production of hydrogen from RES could become competitive in the long run (2030-2050) if capital costs decrease significantly. Optimal long-term hydrogen supply routes depend on regional characteristics, such as RES conditions and gas prices. Imports are cost-effective where domestic production potential is small and/or cost-intensive. Additionally, good import conditions exist for countries which are connected to prospective low-cost exporters via existing natural gas pipelines that can be retrofitted to transport hydrogen. Due to high costs for seaborne transport, hydrogen trade will most likely be concentrated regionally, and markets with different provision schemes could emerge. The results are highly sensitive to capital cost assumptions and natural gas prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Brändle, Gregor & Schönfisch, Max & Schulte, Simon, 2020. "Estimating Long-Term Global Supply Costs for Low-Carbon Hydrogen," EWI Working Papers 2020-4, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI), revised 10 Aug 2021.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ewikln:2020_004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ewi.uni-koeln.de/cms/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/EWI_WP_20-04_Estimating_long-term_global_supply_costs_for_low-carbon_Schoenfisch_Braendle_Schulte_new.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beiron, Johanna & Montañés, Rubén M. & Normann, Fredrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2020. "Combined heat and power operational modes for increased product flexibility in a waste incineration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Knaut, Andreas & Paschmann, Martin, 2017. "Decoding Restricted Participation in Sequential Electricity Markets," EWI Working Papers 2017-5, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI), revised 31 Aug 2017.
    3. Scapino, Luca & De Servi, Carlo & Zondag, Herbert A. & Diriken, Jan & Rindt, Camilo C.M. & Sciacovelli, Adriano, 2020. "Techno-economic optimization of an energy system with sorption thermal energy storage in different energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Hong, Lixuan & Lund, Henrik & Möller, Bernd, 2012. "The importance of flexible power plant operation for Jiangsu's wind integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 499-507.
    5. Kubik, M.L. & Coker, P.J. & Barlow, J.F., 2015. "Increasing thermal plant flexibility in a high renewables power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 102-111.
    6. Zhao, Yongliang & Wang, Chaoyang & Liu, Ming & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2018. "Improving operational flexibility by regulating extraction steam of high-pressure heaters on a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant: A dynamic simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1295-1309.
    7. Evans, Annette & Strezov, Vladimir & Evans, Tim J., 2012. "Assessment of utility energy storage options for increased renewable energy penetration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4141-4147.
    8. Eser, Patrick & Singh, Antriksh & Chokani, Ndaona & Abhari, Reza S., 2016. "Effect of increased renewables generation on operation of thermal power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 723-732.
    9. Jacek D. Wojcik & Jihong Wang, 2017. "Technical Feasibility Study of Thermal Energy Storage Integration into the Conventional Power Plant Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Zhao, Yongliang & Liu, Ming & Wang, Chaoyang & Li, Xin & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2018. "Increasing operational flexibility of supercritical coal-fired power plants by regulating thermal system configuration during transient processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2375-2386.
    11. Arcos-Vargas, Ángel & Canca, David & Núñez, Fernando, 2020. "Impact of battery technological progress on electricity arbitrage: An application to the Iberian market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    12. Bradbury, Kyle & Pratson, Lincoln & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia, 2014. "Economic viability of energy storage systems based on price arbitrage potential in real-time U.S. electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 512-519.
    13. Richter, Marcel & Oeljeklaus, Gerd & Görner, Klaus, 2019. "Improving the load flexibility of coal-fired power plants by the integration of a thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 607-621.
    14. Walawalkar, Rahul & Apt, Jay & Mancini, Rick, 2007. "Economics of electric energy storage for energy arbitrage and regulation in New York," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 2558-2568, April.
    15. Sioshansi, Ramteen & Denholm, Paul & Jenkin, Thomas & Weiss, Jurgen, 2009. "Estimating the value of electricity storage in PJM: Arbitrage and some welfare effects," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 269-277, March.
    16. Knaut, Andreas & Obermüller, Frank & Weiser, Florian, 2017. "Tender Frequency and Market Concentration in Balancing Power Markets," EWI Working Papers 2017-4, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    17. Wolf-Peter Schill & Michael Pahle & Christian Gambardella, 2016. "On Start-up Costs of Thermal Power Plants in Markets with Increasing Shares of Fluctuating Renewables," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1540, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Ju-Sung & Cherif, Ali & Yoon, Ha-Jun & Seo, Seung-Kwon & Bae, Ju-Eon & Shin, Ho-Jin & Lee, Chulgu & Kwon, Hweeung & Lee, Chul-Jin, 2022. "Large-scale overseas transportation of hydrogen: Comparative techno-economic and environmental investigation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. César Berna-Escriche & Carlos Vargas-Salgado & David Alfonso-Solar & Alberto Escrivá-Castells, 2022. "Hydrogen Production from Surplus Electricity Generated by an Autonomous Renewable System: Scenario 2040 on Grand Canary Island, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    3. Webb, Jeremy & Longden, Thomas & Boulaire, Fanny & Gono, Marcel & Wilson, Clevo, 2023. "The application of green finance to the production of blue and green hydrogen: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    4. Schlund, David & Schönfisch, Max, 2021. "Analysing the impact of a renewable hydrogen quota on the European electricity and natural gas markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    5. Adrian Odenweller & Falko Ueckerdt & Gregory F. Nemet & Miha Jensterle & Gunnar Luderer, 2022. "Probabilistic feasibility space of scaling up green hydrogen supply," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 854-865, September.
    6. Reed, Jeffrey & Dailey, Emily & Shaffer, Brendan & Lane, Blake & Flores, Robert & Fong, Amber & Samuelsen, Scott, 2023. "Potential evolution of the renewable hydrogen sector using California as a reference market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    7. Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah & Solomon Eghosa Uhunamure & Karabo Shale & Ifeoma Prisca Onyenegecha & Vladimir Ivanovich Velkin, 2023. "Can Africa Serve Europe with Hydrogen Energy from Its Renewables?—Assessing the Economics of Shipping Hydrogen and Hydrogen Carriers to Europe from Different Parts of the Continent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Kirchem, Dana & Schill, Wolf-Peter, 2023. "Power sector effects of green hydrogen production in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    9. Seck, Gondia S. & Hache, Emmanuel & Sabathier, Jerome & Guedes, Fernanda & Reigstad, Gunhild A. & Straus, Julian & Wolfgang, Ove & Ouassou, Jabir A. & Askeland, Magnus & Hjorth, Ida & Skjelbred, Hans , 2022. "Hydrogen and the decarbonization of the energy system in europe in 2050: A detailed model-based analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Scharf, Hendrik & Möst, Dominik, 2024. "Gas power — How much is needed on the road to carbon neutrality?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Bae, Dasol & Kim, Yikyeom & Ko, Eun Hee & Ju Han, Seung & Lee, Jae W. & Kim, Minkyu & Kang, Dohyung, 2023. "Methane pyrolysis and carbon formation mechanisms in molten manganese chloride mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    12. Zhang, Tongtong & Uratani, Joao & Huang, Yixuan & Xu, Lejin & Griffiths, Steve & Ding, Yulong, 2023. "Hydrogen liquefaction and storage: Recent progress and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. ElSayed, Mai & Aghahosseini, Arman & Caldera, Upeksha & Breyer, Christian, 2023. "Analysing the techno-economic impact of e-fuels and e-chemicals production for exports and carbon dioxide removal on the energy system of sunbelt countries – Case of Egypt," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    14. Muhammad Amin & Hamad Hussain Shah & Bilal Bashir & Muhammad Azhar Iqbal & Umer Hameed Shah & Muhammad Umair Ali, 2023. "Environmental Assessment of Hydrogen Utilization in Various Applications and Alternative Renewable Sources for Hydrogen Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, May.
    15. De-León Almaraz, Sofía & Rácz, Viktor & Azzaro-Pantel, Catherine & Szántó, Zoltán Oszkár, 2022. "Multiobjective and social cost-benefit optimisation for a sustainable hydrogen supply chain: Application to Hungary," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    16. Schlund, David & Theile, Philipp, 2021. "Simultaneity of green energy and hydrogen production: Analysing the dispatch of a grid-connected electrolyser," EWI Working Papers 2021-10, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    17. Schlund, David & Theile, Philipp, 2022. "Simultaneity of green energy and hydrogen production: Analysing the dispatch of a grid-connected electrolyser," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    18. Galimova, Tansu & Satymov, Rasul & Keiner, Dominik & Breyer, Christian, 2024. "Sustainable energy transition of Greenland and its prospects as a potential Arctic e-fuel and e-chemical export hub for Europe and East Asia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    19. Lena Tholen & Anna Leipprand & Dagmar Kiyar & Sarah Maier & Malte Küper & Thomas Adisorn & Andreas Fischer, 2021. "The Green Hydrogen Puzzle: Towards a German Policy Framework for Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Schönfisch, Max, 2022. "Charting the Development of a Global Market for Low-Carbon Hydrogen," EWI Working Papers 2022-3, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    21. Jeddi, Samir & Lencz, Dominic & Wildgrube, Theresa, 2021. "Complementing carbon prices with Carbon Contracts for Difference in the presence of risk - When is it beneficial and when not?," EWI Working Papers 2021-9, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI), revised 16 Aug 2022.
    22. Adeola Akinpelu & Md Shafiul Alam & Md Shafiullah & Syed Masiur Rahman & Fahad Saleh Al-Ismail, 2023. "Greenhouse Gas Emission Dynamics of Saudi Arabia: Potential of Hydrogen Fuel for Emission Footprint Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    23. David Franzmann & Heidi Heinrichs & Felix Lippkau & Thushara Addanki & Christoph Winkler & Patrick Buchenberg & Thomas Hamacher & Markus Blesl & Jochen Lin{ss}en & Detlef Stolten, 2023. "Green Hydrogen Cost-Potentials for Global Trade," Papers 2303.00314, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    24. Kai Schulze & Mile Mišić & Nikola Radojičić & Berkin Serin, 2024. "Evaluating Partners for Renewable Energy Trading: A Multidimensional Framework and Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Çam, Eren, 2020. "Optimal Dispatch of a Coal-Fired Power Plant with Integrated Thermal Energy Storage," EWI Working Papers 2020-5, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI), revised 10 Aug 2021.
    2. Núñez, Fernando & Canca, David & Arcos-Vargas, Ángel, 2022. "An assessment of European electricity arbitrage using storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    3. Ikechi Emmanuel, Michael & Denholm, Paul, 2022. "A market feedback framework for improved estimates of the arbitrage value of energy storage using price-taker models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    4. McPherson, Madeleine & Tahseen, Samiha, 2018. "Deploying storage assets to facilitate variable renewable energy integration: The impacts of grid flexibility, renewable penetration, and market structure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 856-870.
    5. Beiron, Johanna & Montañés, Rubén M. & Normann, Fredrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2020. "Flexible operation of a combined cycle cogeneration plant – A techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Zhao, Yongliang & Liu, Ming & Wang, Chaoyang & Wang, Zhu & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2019. "Exergy analysis of the regulating measures of operational flexibility in supercritical coal-fired power plants during transient processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Zakeri, Behnam & Syri, Sanna, 2015. "Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 569-596.
    8. McConnell, Dylan & Forcey, Tim & Sandiford, Mike, 2015. "Estimating the value of electricity storage in an energy-only wholesale market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 422-432.
    9. Dusonchet, L. & Favuzza, S. & Massaro, F. & Telaretti, E. & Zizzo, G., 2019. "Technological and legislative status point of stationary energy storages in the EU," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 158-167.
    10. Wonchang Hur & Yongma Moon & Kwangsup Shin & Wooje Kim & Suchul Nam & Kijun Park, 2015. "Economic Value of Li-ion Energy Storage System in Frequency Regulation Application from Utility Firm’s Perspective in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Chyong, Chi Kong & Newbery, David, 2022. "A unit commitment and economic dispatch model of the GB electricity market – Formulation and application to hydro pumped storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    12. Telaretti, E. & Dusonchet, L., 2017. "Stationary battery technologies in the U.S.: Development Trends and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 380-392.
    13. Zhao, Haitao & Jiang, Peng & Chen, Zhe & Ezeh, Collins I. & Hong, Yuanda & Guo, Yishan & Zheng, Chenghang & Džapo, Hrvoje & Gao, Xiang & Wu, Tao, 2019. "Improvement of fuel sources and energy products flexibility in coal power plants via energy-cyber-physical-systems approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    14. Yan, Hui & Liu, Ming & Wang, Zhu & Zhang, Kezhen & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2023. "Flexibility enhancement of solar-aided coal-fired power plant under different direct normal irradiance conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    15. Arcos-Vargas, Ángel & Canca, David & Núñez, Fernando, 2020. "Impact of battery technological progress on electricity arbitrage: An application to the Iberian market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    16. Berrada, Asmae & Loudiyi, Khalid & Zorkani, Izeddine, 2016. "Valuation of energy storage in energy and regulation markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1109-1118.
    17. Liu, Zefeng & Wang, Chaoyang & Fan, Jianlin & Liu, Ming & Xing, Yong & Yan, Junjie, 2024. "Enhancing the flexibility and stability of coal-fired power plants by optimizing control schemes of throttling high-pressure extraction steam," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    18. Cho, Joohyun & Kleit, Andrew N., 2015. "Energy storage systems in energy and ancillary markets: A backwards induction approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 176-183.
    19. Khan, Agha Salman M. & Verzijlbergh, Remco A. & Sakinci, Ozgur Can & De Vries, Laurens J., 2018. "How do demand response and electrical energy storage affect (the need for) a capacity market?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 39-62.
    20. Goteti, Naga Srujana & Hittinger, Eric & Sergi, Brian & Lima Azevedo, Inês, 2021. "How does new energy storage affect the operation and revenue of existing generation?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Low-Carbon Hydrogen; Hydrogen Production; Hydrogen Transportation; Levelised Cost;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q49 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ewikln:2020_004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sabine Williams (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ewikode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.