IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-24-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Energy Transition and Local Government Finance: New Data and Insights from 10 US States

Author

Listed:
  • Raimi, Daniel

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Davert, Elena
  • Neuenfeldt, Haley
  • Van Zanen, Amy
  • Whitlock, Zachary

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

Fossil fuels are the primary contributor to global climate change, and efforts to reach net-zero emissions will require a dramatic curtailment of their extraction and use. However, fossil fuels fund public services at all levels of government, and research has not assessed whether clean energy sources can provide similar scales of revenue. In this paper, we analyze a novel dataset that we have assembled on how fossil fuels and renewable energy contribute to local governments in 79 US counties across 10 states. Revenues from fossil fuels far outweigh renewables in aggregate terms, providing more than $1,000 per capita annually in dozens of counties. However, wind and solar in some states generate more local public revenue than fossil fuels per unit of primary energy production. In most counties that depend heavily on fossil fuels for local revenues, solar—but not wind—has the technical potential to replace existing fossil fuel revenues, but this would require dedicating implausibly large portions of developable land (in some cases, more than half) to solar. For counties with less reliance on fossil fuels, wind and solar can more plausibly replace fossil fuel revenue streams. This finding suggests that while renewable energy will provide new revenue streams for communities, fossil fuel–dependent regions will need to build new tax bases well beyond wind and solar, develop other sources of revenue, or risk a decline in public service provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Raimi, Daniel & Davert, Elena & Neuenfeldt, Haley & Van Zanen, Amy & Whitlock, Zachary, 2024. "The Energy Transition and Local Government Finance: New Data and Insights from 10 US States," RFF Working Paper Series 24-01, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-24-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4337/WP_24-01_v2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mayfield, Erin & Jenkins, Jesse & Larson, Eric & Greig, Chris, 2023. "Labor pathways to achieve net-zero emissions in the United States by mid-century," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Brian C. Prest, 2022. "Supply-Side Reforms to Oil and Gas Production on Federal Lands: Modeling the Implications for CO2 Emissions, Federal Revenues, and Leakage," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(4), pages 681-720.
    3. Sward, Jeffrey A. & Nilson, Roberta S. & Katkar, Venktesh V. & Stedman, Richard C. & Kay, David L. & Ifft, Jennifer E. & Zhang, K. Max, 2021. "Integrating social considerations in multicriteria decision analysis for utility-scale solar photovoltaic siting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hou, Yali & Wang, Qunwei & Tan, Tao, 2023. "An ensemble learning framework for rooftop photovoltaic project site selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    2. Marttunen, Mika & Haara, Arto & Hjerppe, Turo & Kurttila, Mikko & Liesiö, Juuso & Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Tolvanen, Anne, 2023. "Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 842-859.
    3. Prest, Brian C. & Stock, James H., 2023. "Climate royalty surcharges," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Beyond the triangle of renewable energy acceptance: The five dimensions of domestic hydrogen acceptance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    5. Jiang, Wei & Zhang, Shuo & Wang, Teng & Zhang, Yufei & Sha, Aimin & Xiao, Jingjing & Yuan, Dongdong, 2024. "Evaluation method for the availability of solar energy resources in road areas before route corridor planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    6. Thebault, Martin & Desthieux, Gilles & Castello, Roberto & Berrah, Lamia, 2022. "Large-scale evaluation of the suitability of buildings for photovoltaic integration: Case study in Greater Geneva," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    7. Grubert, E. & Zacarias, M., 2022. "Paradigm shifts for environmental assessment of decarbonizing energy systems: Emerging dominance of embodied impacts and design-oriented decision support needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Gazmararian, Alexander F., 2024. "Fossil fuel communities support climate policy coupled with just transition assistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    9. Elkadeem, Mohamed R. & Younes, Ali & Mazzeo, Domenico & Jurasz, Jakub & Elia Campana, Pietro & Sharshir, Swellam W. & Alaam, Mohamed A., 2022. "Geospatial-assisted multi-criterion analysis of solar and wind power geographical-technical-economic potential assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    10. Zhang, Zhiying & Liao, Huchang & Tang, Anbin, 2022. "Renewable energy portfolio optimization with public participation under uncertainty: A hybrid multi-attribute multi-objective decision-making method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    11. Pinto, Maria Cristina & Crespi, Giulia & Dell'Anna, Federico & Becchio, Cristina, 2023. "Combining energy dynamic simulation and multi-criteria analysis for supporting investment decisions on smart shading devices in office buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    12. José Eduardo Tafula & Constantino Dário Justo & Pedro Moura & Jérôme Mendes & Ana Soares, 2023. "Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach for Optimum Site Selection for Off-Grid Solar Photovoltaic Microgrids in Mozambique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-41, March.
    13. Katkar, Venktesh V. & Sward, Jeffrey A. & Worsley, Alex & Zhang, K. Max, 2021. "Strategic land use analysis for solar energy development in New York State," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 861-875.
    14. Venkatraman Indrajayanthan & Nalin Kant Mohanty & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Lucian Mihet-Popa, 2022. "Investigation on Current and Prospective Energy Transition Scenarios in Indian Landscape Using Integrated SWOT-MCDA Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-31, April.
    15. Jerome G. Gacu & Junrey D. Garcia & Eddie G. Fetalvero & Merian P. Catajay-Mani & Cris Edward F. Monjardin, 2023. "Suitability Analysis Using GIS-Based Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Solar Power Exploration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-28, September.
    16. Junghyun Lim & Michaël Aklin & Morgan R. Frank, 2023. "Location is a major barrier for transferring US fossil fuel employment to green jobs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Vögele, Stefan & Teja Josyabhatla, Vishnu & Ball, Christopher & Rhoden, Imke & Grajewski, Matthias & Rübbelke, Dirk & Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm, 2023. "Robust assessment of energy scenarios from stakeholders' perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    18. Kahsar, Rudy, 2021. "The soft path revisited: Policies that drive decentralization of electric power generation in the contiguous U.S," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    19. Williams, Henry J. & Hashad, Khaled & Wang, Haomiao & Max Zhang, K., 2023. "The potential for agrivoltaics to enhance solar farm cooling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    20. Chalaye, Pierrick & Sturmberg, Bjorn & Ransan-Cooper, Hedda & Lucas-Healey, Kathryn & Russell, A. Wendy & Hendriks, Johannes & Hansen, Paula & O'Neill, Matthew & Crowfoot, Warwick & Shorten, Phil, 2023. "Does site selection need to be democratized? A case study of grid-tied microgrids in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-24-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.