IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rco/dpaper/361.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Intertemporal Hedging and Trade in Repeated Games with Recursive Utility

Author

Listed:
  • Kochov, Asen

    (University of Rochester)

  • Song, Yangwei

    (HU Berlin)

Abstract

Recursive preferences have found widespread application in representative-agent asset-pricing models and general equilibrium. A majority of these applications exploit two decision-theoretic properties not shared by the standard model of intertemporal choice: (i) agents care about the intertemporal distribution of risk and (ii) rates of time preference, rather than being exogenously fixed, may vary with the level of consumption. We investigate what these features imply in the context of a repeated strategic interaction. Specifically, we identify novel opportunities for the players to manage risk and trade intertemporally, and characterize when such opportunities lead to an expansion of the feasible set of payoffs. Sharp implications for equilibrium behavior and the folk theorem are also deduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Kochov, Asen & Song, Yangwei, 2022. "Intertemporal Hedging and Trade in Repeated Games with Recursive Utility," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 361, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  • Handle: RePEc:rco:dpaper:361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rationality-and-competition.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/361.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    recursive utility; repeated games; correlation aversion; endogenous discounting; intertemporal trade; intertemporal hedging;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rco:dpaper:361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Viviana Lalli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rationality-and-competition.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.