IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/834.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The International Regulation of Dumping: Protection Made Too Easy

Author

Listed:
  • Klaus Stegemann

Abstract

In many ways, the international regulation of dumping looks like a model of successful multilateral rule making. Yet the systemic justification of anti-dumping measures is dubious, and international rule making has perversely served to expand the scope for regulatory protection. The multilaterally agreed rules have made protection too easy, as compared to the standards that are used to regulate predatory behavior under domestic competition laws and as compared to the standards stipulated for safeguard measures under Article XIX of the GATT. This paper also explores the reasons why the deregulation of dumping will be difficult

Suggested Citation

  • Klaus Stegemann, 1991. "The International Regulation of Dumping: Protection Made Too Easy," Working Paper 834, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/working_papers/papers/qed_wp_834.pdf
    File Function: First version 1991
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Finger, J. Michael & Murray, Tracy, 1990. "Policing unfair imports : the U.S. example," Policy Research Working Paper Series 401, The World Bank.
    2. Jeffrey J. Schott, 2006. "Completing the Doha Round," Policy Briefs PB06-7, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    3. Dutz, Mark A., 1991. "Enforcement of Canadian"unfair"trade laws : the case for competition policies as an antidote for protection," Policy Research Working Paper Series 776, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schuknecht, Ludger & Stephan, Joerg, 1994. "EC Trade Protection Law: Produmping or Antidumping?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 80(1-2), pages 143-156, July.
    2. repec:lic:licosd:13703 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6629 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nogues, Julio J. & Baracat, Elias, 2005. "Political economy of antidumping and safeguards in Argentina," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3587, The World Bank.
    2. Phedon Nicolaides, 1990. "Anti-dumping measures as safeguards: the case of the EC," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 25(6), pages 273-279, November.
    3. Mustapha SADNI JALLAB, 2007. "The Political Influence Of European And American Antidumping Decisions: Some Empirical Evidence," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 6(18), pages 1-8.
    4. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:6:y:2007:i:18:p:1-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Langhammer, Rolf J., 1991. "Nachsitzen in der Uruguay-Runde: zu viele Streitpunkte, zu wenig Ergebnisse," Kiel Discussion Papers 170, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Warwick Mckibbin & Dominick Salvatore, 1995. "The global economic consequences of the Uruguay Round," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 111-129, April.
    7. Thomas J. Prusa, 1998. "Cumulation and Anti‐dumping: A Challenge to Competition," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(8), pages 1021-1033, November.
    8. Banks, Gary, 1990. "Australia's antidumping experience," Policy Research Working Paper Series 551, The World Bank.
    9. Cletus C. Coughlin, 1991. "U.S. trade-remedy laws: do they facilitate or hinder free trade?," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Jul, pages 3-18.
    10. Trien T. Nguyen & Carlo Perroni & Randall M. Wigle, 1991. "The Value of a Uruguay Round Success," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(4), pages 359-374, December.
    11. Drabek, Zdenek & Laird, Sam, 1997. "The new liberalism: Trade policy developments in emerging markets," WTO Staff Working Papers ERAD-97-07, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    12. Sánchez-Cano, Julieta Evangelina, 2012. "The public policies of the mexican agricutural sector in the framework of the international economy," eseconomía, Escuela Superior de Economía, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, vol. 0(33), pages 45-77, primer tr.
    13. McCalla, Alex F., 2007. "Implications of WTO Developments for Market Integration," 2007 NAAMIC Workshop IV: Contemporary Drivers of Integration 163900, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    14. D. Greenaway, 1991. "The Uruguay Round Of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Last Chance For Gatt?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 365-379, September.
    15. Angelika Eymann & Ludger Schuknecht, 1996. "Antidumping Policy In The European Community: Political Discretion Or Technical Determination," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 111-131, July.
    16. Primo Braga, Carlos Alberto & Silber, Simao Davi, 1991. "Brazilian frozen concentrated orange juice : the folly of unfair trade cases," Policy Research Working Paper Series 687, The World Bank.
    17. Khan, Nadeem, 1994. "Firm's behavior in the presence of antidumping laws," ISU General Staff Papers 1994010108000011487, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Michael Davenport, 1990. "The economics of antidumping and the Uruguay Round," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 25(6), pages 267-273, November.
    19. Laird, Samuel, 1992. "Non-tariff measures in hemispheric FTA negotiations," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 33909, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.