IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/99673.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Domestic food assistance to vulnerable groups: infrastructure, social nutrition, organic agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Stukach, Victor
  • Starovoytova, Natalya
  • Dolmatova, Olga
  • Evdokhina, Olga

Abstract

This article sets the goal: to create a methodological basis for the development of a specific infrastructure of domestic food assistance, to ensure healthy nutrition for those in need. Proposals for measures ensuring food security, the creation of human capital, the development of agricultural production and the rational management of natural resources are presented. The proposals on the use of state support tools within the framework of the “green basket” of the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the motivation of farmers to maintain soil fertility and use the land withdrawn from circulation as a resource for the production of environmentally friendly food are presented. Land resources are needed to organize environmentally friendly production with a low processing intensity - without the use of pesticides with a limited amount of fertilizer.

Suggested Citation

  • Stukach, Victor & Starovoytova, Natalya & Dolmatova, Olga & Evdokhina, Olga, 2020. "Domestic food assistance to vulnerable groups: infrastructure, social nutrition, organic agriculture," MPRA Paper 99673, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:99673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/99673/7/MPRA_paper_99673.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evans, David K. & Popova, Anna, 2014. "Cash transfers and temptation goods : a review of global evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6886, The World Bank.
    2. Hanan G. Jacoby, 2002. "Is There an Intrahousehold "Flypaper Effect"? Evidence From a School Feeding Programme," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(476), pages 196-221, January.
    3. Janice Peterson, 2002. "The TANF Reauthorization Debate: Key Welfare Reform Issues and Concerns," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 431-439, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Стукач Виктор Федорович, 2011. "Инфраструктура Производственных Услуг: Новые Тенденции," Экономика региона, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки «Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук», issue 4, pages 133-142.
    2. Аникина, Надежда & Стукач, Виктор, 2012. "Неформальные Институты Трансакционного Сектора Региона: Агроэкономический Аспект [Informal institutions transaction sector of the region: the agro-economic aspect]," MPRA Paper 74171, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2016.
    3. Stukach, Victor & Grishaev, Egor, 2008. "Агропродовольственный Рынок Региона: Классификация Институтов, Административные Барьеры, Трансакционные Издержки, Неэффективные Посредники [The region's agro-food market: the classification of inst," MPRA Paper 79290, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Apr 2017.
    4. Виктор, Стукач & Надежда, Аникина, 2016. "Влияние Организационной Культуры На Уровень Трансакционных Издержек В Аграрной Экономике [Organizational culture influences the level of transaction costs in the agrarian economy]," MPRA Paper 73204, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2016.
    5. Stukach, Victor & Pomogaev, Vitaly & Zinich, Alla & Nflejta, Anicin, 2015. "Protección Social: Infraestructura Regional de Distribución de Asistencia Alimentaria," MPRA Paper 81523, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 2017.
    6. van de Walle, Dominique & Mu, Ren, 2007. "Fungibility and the flypaper effect of project aid: Micro-evidence for Vietnam," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 667-685, November.
    7. Orazio Attanasio & Sarah Cattan & Emla Fitzsimons & Costas Meghir & Marta Rubio-Codina, 2020. "Estimating the Production Function for Human Capital: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Colombia," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(1), pages 48-85, January.
    8. Orazio Attanasio & Helen Baker-Henningham & Raquel Bernal & Costas Meghir & Diana Pineda & Marta Rubio-Codina, 2022. "Early Stimulation and Nutrition: The Impacts of a Scalable Intervention," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(4), pages 1395-1432.
    9. M. Caridad Araujo & Mariano Bosch & Norbert Schady, 2017. "Can Cash Transfers Help Households Escape an Intergenerational Poverty Trap?," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Poverty Traps, pages 357-382, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. James Berry, 2015. "Child Control in Education Decisions: An Evaluation of Targeted Incentives to Learn in India," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(4), pages 1051-1080.
    11. Ruel, Marie T. & de la Briere, Benedicte & Hallman, Kelly & Quisumbing, Agnes R. & Coj, Nora, 2002. "Does subsidized childcare help poor working women in urban areas?," FCND briefs 131, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Christina Paxson & Norbert Schady, 2007. "Does Money Matter? The Effects of Cash Transfers on Child Health and Development in Rural Ecuador," Working Papers 145, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    13. Lara Cockx & Nathalie Francken, 2016. "Evolution and impact of EU aid for food and nutrition security: a review," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven 540512, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    14. Facundo Albornoz & Samuel Berlinski & Antonio Cabrales, 2016. "Motivation, Resources and the Organization of the School System," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 94958, Inter-American Development Bank.
    15. Kochar, Anjini & Nagabhushana, Closepet & Sarkar, Ritwik & Shah, Rohan & Singh, Geeta, 2022. "Financial access and women's role in household decisions: Empirical evidence from India's National Rural Livelihoods project," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Kate Ambler & Diego Aycinena & Dean Yang, 2015. "Channeling Remittances to Education: A Field Experiment among Migrants from El Salvador," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(2), pages 207-232, April.
    17. Orazio Attanasio & Sarah Cattan & Emla Fitzsimons & Costas Meghir & Marta Rubio-Codina, 2015. "Estimating the Production Function for Human Capital: Results from a Randomized Control Trial in Colombia," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1987, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    18. Kazianga, Harounan & de Walque, Damien & Alderman, Harold, 2009. "Educational and health impacts of two school feeding schemes : evidence from a randomized trial in rural Burkina Faso," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4976, The World Bank.
    19. Indunil De Silva & Sudarno Sumarto, 2015. "How do Educational Transfers Affect Child Labour Supply and Expenditures? Evidence from Indonesia of Impact and Flypaper Effects," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 483-507, December.
    20. Hidalgo, Diana & Onofa, Mercedes & Oosterbeek, Hessel & Ponce, Juan, 2013. "Can provision of free school uniforms harm attendance? Evidence from Ecuador," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 43-51.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    food aid; state support; technologies for soil conservation agriculture;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D1 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior
    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:99673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.