IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/50534.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Malthus versus Ricardo 1815 Corn Laws Controversy: An appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Salvadori, Neri
  • Signorino, Rodolfo

Abstract

The paper proposes a rational reconstruction of the arguments developed by Malthus and Ricardo in their 1815 essays, Grounds of an Opinion and An Essay on Profits, to repudiate and endorse a policy of free corn trade, respectively. Malthus envisaged defence and opulence as two mutually alternative options and, if required to make a choice, he had no doubt in choosing the former. By contrast, Ricardo excluded any alternative between defence and opulence: trade does note give a sustainable weapon to potential enemies of Great Britain whereas trade-driven opulence may give Great Britain greater means to wage a war.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvadori, Neri & Signorino, Rodolfo, 2013. "The Malthus versus Ricardo 1815 Corn Laws Controversy: An appraisal," MPRA Paper 50534, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:50534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/50534/1/MPRA_paper_50534.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harsanyi John C., 1995. "A New Theory of Equilibrium Selection for Games with Incomplete Information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 318-332, August.
    2. Maneschi, Andrea, 1992. "Ricardo's International Trade Theory: Beyond the Comparative Cost Example," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(4), pages 421-437, December.
    3. Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey, 2006. "From the Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas, and Institutions in Historical Perspective," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262195437, April.
    4. Samuel Hollander, 1977. "Ricardo and the Corn Laws: A Revision," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 1-47, Spring.
    5. Peach, Terry, 1984. "David Ricardo's Early Treatment of Profitability: A New Interpretation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 94(376), pages 733-751, December.
    6. repec:bla:econom:v:53:y:1986:i:212:p:467-81 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Samuel Hollander, 1995. "More on Malthus and Agricultural Protection," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 531-537, Fall.
    8. O'Brien, D P, 1981. "Ricardian Economics and the Economics of David Ricardo," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 352-386, November.
    9. J. M. Pullen, 1995. "Malthus on Agricultural Protection: An Alternative View," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 517-529, Fall.
    10. repec:bla:econom:v:41:y:1974:i:161:p:1-13 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. repec:bla:econom:v:42:y:1975:i:166:p:182-87 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Hollander, Samuel, 1992. "Malthus's Abandonment of Agricultural Protectionism: A Discovery in the History of Economic Thought," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(3), pages 650-659, June.
    13. Garegnani, P, 1982. "On Hollander's Interpretation of Ricardo's Early Theory of Profits," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(1), pages 65-77, March.
    14. Roy J. Ruffin, 2002. "David Ricardo's Discovery of Comparative Advantage," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 727-748, Winter.
    15. Hollander, Samuel, 1983. "Professor Garegnani's Defence of Sraffa on the Material Rate of Profit [On Hollander's Interpretation of Ricardo's Early Theory of Profits]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(2), pages 167-174, June.
    16. Maneschi, Andrea, 1983. "Dynamic Aspects of Ricardo's International Trade Theory," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 67-80, March.
    17. de Vivo, Giancarlo, 1985. "Robert Torrens and Ricardo's 'Corn-Ratio' Theory of Profits," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 9(1), pages 89-92, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bellino, Enrico & Serrano, Franklin, 2017. "Gravitation of market prices towards normal prices: some new results," MPRA Paper 79297, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maneschi, Andrea, 2004. "The true meaning of David Ricardo's four magic numbers," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 433-443, March.
    2. Andrea Maneschi, 2008. "How Would David Ricardo Have Taught the Principle of Comparative Advantage?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 74(4), pages 1167-1176, April.
    3. Morales Meoqui, Jorge, 2012. "On the distribution of authorship-merits for the comparative-advantage proposition," MPRA Paper 35905, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. repec:grz:wpaper:2014-02 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Duccio Cavalieri, 2009. "Sull'inseparabilit? delle strutture sintattiche nell'analisi classica del valore e della distribuzione," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(97), pages 5-46.
    6. John E. King, 2013. "Ricardo on Trade," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(4), pages 462-469, December.
    7. Javier San Julian Arrupe (Universitat de Barcelona), 2012. "Economic ideas and tax policy: The introduction of progressivity in tax systems in Western Europe. The cases of France and Spain," Working Papers in Economics 285, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
    8. Konstantinos Georgalos & Indrajit Ray & Sonali SenGupta, 2020. "Nash versus coarse correlation," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(4), pages 1178-1204, December.
    9. Sven Fischer & Werner Güth & Wieland Müller & Andreas Stiehler, 2006. "From ultimatum to Nash bargaining: Theory and experimental evidence," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 9(1), pages 17-33, April.
    10. Eguia, Jon X. & Llorente-Saguer, Aniol & Morton, Rebecca & Nicolò, Antonio, 2018. "Equilibrium selection in sequential games with imperfect information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 465-483.
    11. Uebele, Martin, 2011. "National and international market integration in the 19th century: Evidence from comovement," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 226-242, April.
    12. Tamás Mizik, 2021. "Agri-Food Trade Competitiveness: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Adrien Hervouet & Michel Trommetter, 2020. "Public-private R&D partnerships: A solution to increase knowledge sharing in R&D cooperation," Working Papers hal-02906270, HAL.
    14. Zissimos, Ben, 2017. "A theory of trade policy under dictatorship and democratization," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 85-101.
    15. Walter Elberfeld, 1997. "Incentive monotonicity and equilibrium selection in 2×2 matrix games," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 279-290, October.
    16. Jorge Morales Meoqui, 2011. "Comparative Advantage and the Labor Theory of Value," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 743-763, Winter.
    17. Belleflamme, Paul, 2002. "Coordination on formal vs. de facto standards: a dynamic approach," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 153-176, March.
    18. Robert A. Blecker, 2015. "International Trade and Development," Working Papers 2015-07, American University, Department of Economics.
    19. Kiatkajon CHAIRAT & Sumalee SANTIPOLLAVUT & Supachart SUKHAROMANA, 2015. "Provincial Clustering in the Southern of Thailand : Concept and Empirical," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 15(1), pages 161-172.
    20. Gonzalo Olcina, 1997. "Forward Induction In Games With An Outside Option," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 177-192, March.
    21. Andrew Eckert & Tilman Klumpp & Xuejuan Su, 2017. "An Equilibrium Selection Theory of Monopolization," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(4), pages 1012-1037, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Malthus; Ricardo; Corn Laws; Coordination Games;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:50534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.