IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/copoec/v37y2018i1p25-64..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gravitation Of Market Prices Towards Normal Prices: Some New Results

Author

Listed:
  • ENRICO BELLINO
  • FRANKLIN SERRANO

Abstract

The gravitation process of market prices towards production prices is here presented by means of an analytical framework where the classical capital mobility principle is coupled with a determination of the deviation of market from normal (natural) prices which closely follows the description provided by Adam Smith: each period the level of the market price of a commodity will be higher (lower) than its production price if the quantity brought to the market falls short (exceeds) the level of effectual demand. This approach simplifies the results with respect to those obtained in cross-dual literature. At the same time, anchoring market prices to effectual demands and quantities brought to the markets requires a careful study of the dynamics of the ‘dimensions’ along with that of the ‘proportions’ of the system. Three different versions of the model are thus proposed, to study the gravitation process: (i) assuming a given level of aggregate employment; (ii) assuming a sort of Say’s law; (iii) and on the basis of an explicit adjustment of actual outputs to effectual demands. All these cases describe dynamics in which market prices can converge asymptotically towards production prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Enrico Bellino & Franklin Serrano, 2018. "Gravitation Of Market Prices Towards Normal Prices: Some New Results," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(1), pages 25-64.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:37:y:2018:i:1:p:25-64.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cpe/bzy011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tony Aspromourgos, 2019. "The Past and Future of Keynesian Economics: A Review Essay," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 59-78, January.
    2. Emiliano Brancaccio, 2022. "A discussion with Vernon Smith on the Classics, Marx, and Sraffa," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 75(303), pages 425-431.
    3. Hang Chen & Cong Lu & Yuewei Wang & Lidan An, 2024. "Competitiveness Evaluation and Cooperation Network Analysis of Tourist Attractions from the Perspective of Co-Opetition in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Tony Aspromourgos & Kenji Mori & Masashi Morioka & Arrigo Opocher & J. Barkley Rosser & Yoshinori Shiozawa & Kazuhisa Taniguchi & Heinz D. Kurz & Neri Salvadori, 2022. "Symposium on Yoshinori Shiozawa, Masashi Morioka and Kazuhisa Taniguchi (2019), Microfoundations of evolutionary economics, Tokyo: Springer Japan," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 2-48, February.
    5. Rotta, Tomás N., 2021. "Effective Demand and Prices of Production: An Evolutionary Approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 90-105.
    6. Biao Huang, 2020. "Normal utilization rate in the Sraffa framework," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 767-780, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:37:y:2018:i:1:p:25-64.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.