IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/118863.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Индустрија 4.0 И Србија
[Industry 4.0 and Serbia]

Author

Listed:
  • Bukvić, Rajko
  • Petrović, Dragan

Abstract

Serbian: У раду се разматра значај концепта Индустрија 4.0 за Србију. Аутори указују на значајну улогу државе у индустријском развоју данашњих развијених земаља. Четврта технолошка (индустријска) револуција заснива се првенствено на дигиталним технологијама, али и на њиховој синтези са другим технологијама, како традиционалним тако и конвенционалним, али и напредним, попут нанотехнологија и биотехнологија. Појава дисруптивних технологија изазива промене на тржиштима, које понекад могу бити револуционарне. Економске, али и друге науке још нису дале коначан суд – да ли ће Четврта технолошка револуција и дисруптивне технологије допринети стварању друштва благостања, смањити сиромаштво и олакшати рад, или повећати материјалну неједнакост, учинити расподелу добара неправеднијом и проузроковати масовну незапосленост. Србија је сада у фази припреме индустријске стратегије и њене имплементације, у њима би велику улогу имали пионири коришћења ових принципа и технологија (као што су ФЦА, Слобода, Металац и др.), као и Машински факултет у Београду, и других научних организација које улажу велике напоре у промовисању принципа Четврте индустријске револуције у Србији. Наравно, не може се занемарити ни активна улога државе у овим процесима. English: The paper considers the importance of the concept Industry 4.0 to Serbia. The authors indicate the significant role of the state during the industrial development of the today’s developed countries. The fourth technological (industrial) revolution is based primarily on digital technologies, but also on their synthesis with other technologies, both traditional and conventional, as well as advanced, such as nanotechnologies and biotechnologies. The emergence of disruptive technologies causes changes in markets, which can sometimes be revolutionary. Economic as well as other sciences have not yet given the ultimate judgment - will the Fourth Technological Revolution and disruptive technologies contribute to the creation of a welfare society, reduce poverty and facilitate work, or increase material inequality, make distribution of goods more unfair and cause mass unemployment. Serbia is now in the phase of preparation of the industrial strategy and its implementation, in them the great role would be devolved to pioneers of the use of these principles and technologies (such as FCA, Sloboda, Metalac and other), as well as Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Belgrade and other scientific organizations which make great efforts in promoting principles of the Fourth industrial revolution in Serbia. Of course, the active role of the state in these processes cannot be neglected.

Suggested Citation

  • Bukvić, Rajko & Petrović, Dragan, 2022. "Индустрија 4.0 И Србија [Industry 4.0 and Serbia]," MPRA Paper 118863, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:118863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/118863/1/MPRA_paper_118863.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik S. Reinert, 1999. "The role of the state in economic growth," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(4/5), pages 268-326, August.
    2. Robert J. Gordon, 2012. "Is U.S. Economic Growth Over? Faltering Innovation Confronts the Six Headwinds," NBER Working Papers 18315, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonin BERGEAUD & Gilbert Cette & Rémy Lecat, 2017. "What role did education, equipment age and technology play in 20th century productivity growth?," Rue de la Banque, Banque de France, issue 43, may..
    2. Kuosmanen, Natalia & Valmari, Nelli, 2023. "Renewal of Companies Through Product Switching," ETLA Working Papers 104, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    3. Basso, Henrique S. & Jimeno, Juan F., 2021. "From secular stagnation to robocalypse? Implications of demographic and technological changes," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 833-847.
    4. Cette, Gilbert & Corde, Simon & Lecat, Rémy, 2018. "Firm-level productivity dispersion and convergence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 76-78.
    5. Gabriele Fiorentini & Alessandro Galesi & Gabriel Pérez-Quirós & Enrique Sentana, 2018. "The rise and fall of the natural interest rate," Working Papers 1822, Banco de España.
    6. Bukvić, Rajko, 2023. "Импликације Методолошког Индивидуализма И Теореме О Невидљивој Руци На Домете Деловања Слободног Тржишта [Implications of methodological individualism and the invisible hand theorem on the scope of," MPRA Paper 121738, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2023.
    7. Antonin Bergeaud & Gilbert Cette & Rémy Lecat, 2014. "Le produit intérieur brut par habitant sur longue période en France et dans les pays avancés : le rôle de la productivité et de l’emploi," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 474(1), pages 5-34.
    8. Abdoulaye Millogo, 2020. "Hysteresis Effects and Macroeconomics Gains from Unconventional Monetary Policies Stabilization," Cahiers de recherche 20-12, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    9. Malmaeus, J. Mikael & Alfredsson, Eva C., 2017. "Potential Consequences on the Economy of Low or No Growth - Short and Long Term Perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 57-64.
    10. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Howitt, Peter, 2014. "What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 515-563, Elsevier.
    11. Singh, Anuraag & Triulzi, Giorgio & Magee, Christopher L., 2021. "Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    12. Eckhard Hein, 2016. "Secular stagnation or stagnation policy? Steindl after Summers," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 69(276), pages 3-47.
    13. David J. Deming, 2017. "The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(4), pages 1593-1640.
    14. Neri, Stefano & Gerali, Andrea, 2019. "Natural rates across the Atlantic," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    15. Kose,Ayhan & Ohnsorge,Franziska Lieselotte & Ye,Lei Sandy & Islamaj,Ergys, 2017. "Weakness in investment growth : causes, implications and policy responses," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7990, The World Bank.
    16. Segoviano, M. & Jones, B. & Linder, P. & Blankenheim, J., 2015. "Reviving securitisation," Financial Stability Review, Banque de France, issue 19, pages 51-87, April.
    17. Giovanni DOSI & Maria Enrica VIRGILLITO, 2019. "Whither the evolution of the contemporary social fabric? New technologies and old socio‐economic trends," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(4), pages 593-625, December.
    18. Steffen Elstner & Lars P. Feld & Christoph M. Schmidt, 2018. "The German Productivity Paradox - Facts and Explanations," CESifo Working Paper Series 7231, CESifo.
    19. Stéphane Lemarié & Valérie Orozco & Jean-Pierre Butault & Antonio Musolesi & Michel Simioni & Bertrand Schmitt, 2020. "Assessing the long-term impact of agricultural research on productivity: evidence from France," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(4), pages 1559-1586.
    20. Robert Shackelton, 2013. "Total Factor Productivity Growth in Historical Perspective: Working Paper 2013-01," Working Papers 44002, Congressional Budget Office.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    индустрија 4.0; Србија; савремене технологије; дисруптивне иновације; биотехнологија; нанотехнологија; тржиште; (не)једнакост; моћ; благостање; Industry 4.0; Serbia; modern technologies; disruptive innovations; biotechnology; nanotechnology; market; (in)equality; poverty; welfare;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • N70 - Economic History - - Economic History: Transport, International and Domestic Trade, Energy, and Other Services - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:118863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.