IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/104588.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring overall convenience of consumers on online shopping and their behavioral intention

Author

Listed:
  • Munshi, M.Faris Uddin
  • Hussain, Hammad
  • Ahmed, Muneeb
  • Idress, Amir

Abstract

The purpose of this research to analyze overall convenience for consumers through online shopping and their behavioral intention towards online customer satisfaction. This study helps people who purchases product and services online because its aim on main factors which create impact on consumers when they buy from web-stores. Moreover, it is also beneficial for the companies and individual who sell their product and services via online. We used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the sample size of 531. We have collected online survey questionnaire from respondent who are convenient to us from Karachi. The nature of the research is quantitative. The purpose of utilizing quantitative methodology that we are able to focus on variety of data to understand the behavior intention and customer satisfaction of those who engage in online shopping. The findings of this research shows that what factors managers should focus on to grow their online sales and improves the efficiency of their websites. Managers should be use it to develop strategies for effective and efficient business, enhance these variable in their online shopping process and make the experience convenient and safe for their customers. Five limitations are available for future studies. First, the data was only collected by 531 respondents. Second, data was collected by respondents living in Karachi, Pakistan. Third, data was collected by respondents that are convenient to us. Fourth, there was limited variable. Fifth, it only perform on SPSS and PLS, no other software used in this research for calculating result and we run only three test on PLS. These limitations, however, provide directions to the researcher.

Suggested Citation

  • Munshi, M.Faris Uddin & Hussain, Hammad & Ahmed, Muneeb & Idress, Amir, 2020. "Measuring overall convenience of consumers on online shopping and their behavioral intention," MPRA Paper 104588, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:104588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/104588/1/MPRA_paper_104588.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mosteller, Jill & Donthu, Naveen & Eroglu, Sevgin, 2014. "The fluent online shopping experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2486-2493.
    2. Tianxiang Sheng & Chunlin Liu, 2010. "An empirical study on the effect of e‐service quality on online customer satisfaction and loyalty," Nankai Business Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(3), pages 273-283, July.
    3. Mercy Mpinganjira, 2015. "Online Store Service Convenience, Customer Satisfaction and Behavioural Intentions: A Focus on Utilitarian Oriented Shoppers," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(1), pages 36-49.
    4. Wasim Qazi & Syed Ali Raza & Komal Akram Khan, 2020. "The contradiction between self-protection and self-presentation on knowledge sharing behaviour: evidence from higher education students in Pakistan," International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 246-271.
    5. Rohm, Andrew J. & Swaminathan, Vanitha, 2004. "A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(7), pages 748-757, July.
    6. Duarte, Paulo & Costa e Silva, Susana & Ferreira, Margarida Bernardo, 2018. "How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 161-169.
    7. Kollmann, Tobias & Kuckertz, Andreas & Kayser, Ina, 2012. "Cannibalization or synergy? Consumers' channel selection in online–offline multichannel systems," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 186-194.
    8. Maria Madlberger, 2006. "Exogenous and Endogenous Antecedents of Online Shopping in a Multichannel Environment: Evidence from a Catalog Retailer in the German-Speaking World," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 4(4), pages 29-51, October.
    9. Sanjit Kumar Roy & Walfried M. Lassar & Vaibhav Shekhar, 2016. "Convenience and satisfaction: mediation of fairness and quality," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5-6), pages 239-260, April.
    10. Pappas, Ilias O. & Kourouthanassis, Panos E. & Giannakos, Michail N. & Chrissikopoulos, Vassilios, 2016. "Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 794-803.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duarte, Paulo & Costa e Silva, Susana & Ferreira, Margarida Bernardo, 2018. "How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 161-169.
    2. Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Shankar, Amit, 2021. "Impact of online convenience on mobile banking adoption intention: A moderated mediation approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    3. Shankar, Amit & Rishi, Bikramjit, 2020. "Convenience matter in mobile banking adoption intention?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 273-285.
    4. Padmavathy, Chandrasekaran & Swapana, Murali & Paul, Justin, 2019. "Online second-hand shopping motivation – Conceptualization, scale development, and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 19-32.
    5. Xu, Xun & Jackson, Jonathan E., 2019. "Examining customer channel selection intention in the omni-channel retail environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 434-445.
    6. Swapan Kumar Saha & Paulo Duarte & Susana C. Silva & Guijun Zhuang, 2021. "Supporting sustainability by promoting online purchase through enhancement of online convenience," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7251-7272, May.
    7. Yahua Bi & Insin Kim, 2020. "Older Travelers’ E-Loyalty: The Roles of Service Convenience and Social Presence in Travel Websites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Gao, Wei & Li, Wenqian & Fan, Hua & Jia, Xingping, 2021. "How customer experience incongruence affects omnichannel customer retention: The moderating role of channel characteristics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Lima Nasrin Eni, 2021. "Factors Affecting Online Shopping Attitude: A Study on Educated Customers of Rangpur Division in Bangladesh," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13.
    10. Anindita Chakraborty, 2024. "Evaluating Young Consumers’ Perception of Online Shopping Convenience," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 32(1), pages 74-86.
    11. Ana-Maria Urdea & Cristinel Petrişor Constantin & Ioana-Mădălina Purcaru, 2021. "Implementing Experiential Marketing in the Digital Age for a More Sustainable Customer Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Sandipan S. Sen & Aliosha Alexandrov & Subhash Jha & William C. McDowell & Emin Babakus, 2023. "Convenient = competitive? How Brick-And-Mortar Retailers can cope with Online Competition," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1615-1643, July.
    13. Chen, Jing & Chen, Bintong, 2019. "When should the offline retailer implement price matching?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 996-1009.
    14. Christopher Agbonifoh & Edith Odia, 2020. "Shoppers’ Perception Of Retail Convenience In Online Shopping In Benin City, Nigeria," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 49-59, March.
    15. Martin, Jillian & Mortimer, Gary & Andrews, Lynda, 2015. "Re-examining online customer experience to include purchase frequency and perceived risk," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 81-95.
    16. Quoc Trung Pham & Xuan Phuc Tran & Sanjay Misra & Rytis Maskeliūnas & Robertas Damaševičius, 2018. "Relationship between Convenience, Perceived Value, and Repurchase Intention in Online Shopping in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Eunhye Kim & Christian Fernando Libaque-Saenz & Myeong-Cheol Park, 2019. "Understanding shopping routes of offline purchasers: selection of search-channels (online vs. offline) and search-platforms (mobile vs. PC) based on product types," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(2), pages 305-338, June.
    18. Hou, Jianwei & Elliott, Kevin, 2014. "How do online bidders differ from non-bidders?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 18-25.
    19. Hussain, Hadia & Murtaza, Murtaza & Ajmal, Areeb & Ahmed, Afreen & Khan, Muhammad Ovais Khalid, 2020. "A study on the effects of social media advertisement on consumer’s attitude and customer response," MPRA Paper 104675, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Neslin, Scott A., 2022. "The omnichannel continuum: Integrating online and offline channels along the customer journey," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 111-132.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Online shopping; Online customer satisfaction; Online transaction; Cash on delivery; Behavioral intention;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:104588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.