IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pil/wpaper/39.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Alta Administração como Recurso Estratégico: Agenda de pesquisa brasileira a partir de estudo bibliográfico dos trabalhos de Hambrick

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Medeiros Jr.

    (UNISUL ? Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina)

  • Fernando A. Ribeiro Serra

    (UNISUL ? Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina)

  • Manuel Portugal Ferreira

    (Instituto Politécnico de Leiria)

Abstract

Entre os principais temas de estudo recentes em estratégia estão o papel da Alta Administração e o processo de tomada de decisão estratégica. O objetivo do artigo é, a partir da produção acadêmica selecionada, inferir uma agenda inicial de pesquisa brasileira para o estudo da ?Alta Administração como recurso estratégico?. Foi realizada uma revisão teórica dos aspectos fundamentais da perspectiva adotada. Foi incluída uma breve descrição dos procedimentos metodológicos, seguida das contribuições de Donald Hambrick, autoridade reconhecida no tema segundo pesquisadores de renome. Foi inferido um conjunto de proposições que poderão orientar pesquisas futuras, discussão global e conclusões. Trata-se de uma pesquisa é de caráter descritivo a partir de estudo bibliográfico. De 57 artigos referenciados do autor, 31 foram selecionados. A partir do estudo foi proposta uma agenda de pesquisa brasileira sobre o tema com nove linhas de trabalho: mandato versus desempenho; compensação, escolhas estratégicas e resultados organizacionais; problemas brasileiros versus os de empresas estrangeiras; características dos CEOs e suas decisões; fatores para sucessão; tamanho e rentabilidade versus compensação; permanência e defesa do status quo e mandato; heterogeneidade da TMT e tomada de decisão; perfil narcisista do CEO, decisões e resultado na organização.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Medeiros Jr. & Fernando A. Ribeiro Serra & Manuel Portugal Ferreira, 2009. "Alta Administração como Recurso Estratégico: Agenda de pesquisa brasileira a partir de estudo bibliográfico dos trabalhos de Hambrick," Working Papers 39, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.
  • Handle: RePEc:pil:wpaper:39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://globadvantage.ipleiria.pt/files/2009/10/working_paper-39_globadvantage.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig Crossland & Donald C. Hambrick, 2007. "How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: a study of CEO effects in three countries," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 767-789, August.
    2. Donald C. Hambrick & Albert A. Cannella, 2004. "CEOs who have COOs: contingency analysis of an unexplored structural form," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(10), pages 959-979, October.
    3. Ingemar Dierickx & Karel Cool, 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1504-1511, December.
    4. Sydney Finkelstein & Donald C. Hambrick, 1989. "Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political processes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 121-134, March.
    5. Donald C. Hambrick & Jiatao Li & Katherine Xin & Anne S. Tsui, 2001. "Compositional gaps and downward spirals in international joint venture management groups," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(11), pages 1033-1053, November.
    6. Sidney Finkelstein & Donald C. Hambrick, 1988. "Chief executive compensation: A synthesis and reconciliation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(6), pages 543-558, November.
    7. Donald C. Hambrick & Sydney Finkelstein, 1995. "The effects of ownership structure on conditions at the top: The case of CEO pay raises," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 175-193.
    8. Danny Miller & Jean-Marie Toulouse, 1986. "Chief Executive Personality and Corporate Strategy and Structure in Small Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(11), pages 1389-1409, November.
    9. Phyllis A. Siegel & Donald C. Hambrick, 2005. "Pay Disparities Within Top Management Groups: Evidence of Harmful Effects on Performance of High-Technology Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 259-274, June.
    10. Vasconcelos, Flávio Carvalho de & Cyrino, Álvaro B., 2000. "Vantagem competitiva: os modelos teóricos atuais e a convergência entre estratégia e teoria organizacional," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 40(4), October.
    11. Theresa S. Cho & Donald C. Hambrick, 2006. "Attention as the Mediator Between Top Management Team Characteristics and Strategic Change: The Case of Airline Deregulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 453-469, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hutzschenreuter, Thomas & Horstkotte, Julian, 2013. "Performance effects of international expansion processes: The moderating role of top management team experiences," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 259-277.
    2. Eric A. Fong, 2010. "Relative CEO Underpayment and CEO Behaviour Towards R&D Spending," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1095-1122, September.
    3. Firth, M. & Tam, M. & Tang, M., 1999. "The determinants of top management pay," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 617-635, December.
    4. Hutzschenreuter, Thomas & Horstkotte, Julian, 2013. "Managerial services and complexity in a firm’s expansion process: An empirical study of the impact on the growth of the firm," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 137-151.
    5. Thomas Hutzschenreuter & Julian Horstkotte, 2013. "Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 704-726, June.
    6. Thomas Greckhamer, 2016. "CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries: The configurational impact of country-level institutions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 793-815, April.
    7. Anja Schwering & Friedrich Sommer & Florian Uepping & Sandra Winkelmann, 2022. "The social-psychological perspective on executive compensation: evidence from a two-tier board system," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 309-345, February.
    8. Schmid, Stefan & Altfeld, Frederic & Dauth, Tobias, 2018. "Americanization as a driver of CEO pay in Europe: The moderating role of CEO power," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 433-451.
    9. Baixauli-Soler, J. Samuel & Sanchez-Marin, Gregorio, 2011. "Organizational governance and TMT pay level adjustment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 862-870, August.
    10. Bruno S. Frey & Marcel Kucher, "undated". "Managerial Power and Compensation," IEW - Working Papers 028, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    11. Laurence Capron & Will Mitchell, 2009. "Selection Capability: How Capability Gaps and Internal Social Frictions Affect Internal and External Strategic Renewal," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 294-312, April.
    12. Humphery-Jenner, M., 2011. "Internal and External Discipline Following Securities Class Actions," Discussion Paper 2011-044, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Bastian Grühn & Steffen Strese & Tessa C. Flatten & Nikolai A. Jaeger & Malte Brettel, 2017. "Temporal Change Patterns of Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Longitudinal Investigation of CEO Successions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(4), pages 591-619, July.
    14. Kweh, Qian Long & Tebourbi, Imen & Lo, Huai-Chun & Huang, Cheng-Tsu, 2022. "CEO compensation and firm performance: Evidence from financially constrained firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    15. Markus A. Fitza, 2014. "The use of variance decomposition in the investigation of CEO effects: How large must the CEO effect be to rule out chance?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1839-1852, December.
    16. Koryak, Oksana & Lockett, Andy & Hayton, James & Nicolaou, Nicos & Mole, Kevin, 2018. "Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 413-427.
    17. Otten, J.A. & Heugens, P.P.M.A.R., 2007. "Extending the Managerial Power Theory of Executive Pay: A Cross National Test," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-090-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Venus, Andreas & Engelen, Andreas, 2012. "A strategy perspective on the performance relevance of the CFO," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2012-021, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    19. Humphery-Jenner, Mark L., 2012. "Internal and external discipline following securities class actions," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 151-179.
    20. Jerayr J. Haleblian & Michael D. Pfarrer & Jason T. Kiley, 2017. "High-Reputation Firms and Their Differential Acquisition Behaviors," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 2237-2254, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Alta administração; Top managers; Caso de estudo; Hambrick;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General
    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pil:wpaper:39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nuno Reis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiplpt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.