IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-03563085.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The rigor-relevance gap in Project Management research: It's time to stop the lament and think and act reflexively

Author

Listed:
  • Jacques-Bernard Gauthier

    (UQO - Université du Québec en Outaouais)

  • Lavagnon Ika

    (École de gestion Telfer / Université d'Ottawa - University of Ottawa [Ottawa])

Abstract

Over the last decades, the "rigor-relevance gap" has garnered attention in Project Management (PM) research. In this paper, we argue that reflexivity can help produce more relevant and rigorous research and we invite scholars to stop sitting on the sidelines only to lament such a gap. In our clarion call to overcoming the gap, we challenge scholars to take an active and competent part. To that end, we outline typical reflexive questions along with four main pillars that scholars ought to take into account: 1) the status of the PM knowledge field; 2) the evolution of PM through historical periods of thoughts; 3) PM and social theory; and 4) ontological and epistemological assumptions. We also showcase the dialectical interplay not only between sociology and PM but also among these interdependent pillars. Finally, we conclude that such an interplay offers the best opportunity to overcome the rigor-relevance gap in PM.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacques-Bernard Gauthier & Lavagnon Ika, 2022. "The rigor-relevance gap in Project Management research: It's time to stop the lament and think and act reflexively," Working Papers hal-03563085, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03563085
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03563085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03563085/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Whitley, 1984. "The Fragmented State Of Management Studies: Reasons And Consequences," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 331-348, July.
    2. Engwall, Mats, 2003. "No project is an island: linking projects to history and context," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 789-808, May.
    3. An, Yunbi & Cheung, Keith, 2010. "Project financing: Deal or no deal," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 72-77, April.
    4. Richard Whitley, 1984. "The Scientific Status Of Management Research As A Practically‐Oriented Social Science," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 369-390, October.
    5. Phil Johnson & Joanne Duberley, 2003. "Reflexivity in Management Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5), pages 1279-1303, July.
    6. Alfred Kieser & Lars Leiner, 2009. "Why the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research Is Unbridgeable," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 516-533, May.
    7. Damian Hodgson, 2002. "Disciplining The Professional: The Case Of Project Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 803-821, September.
    8. Rakesh Khurana, 2007. "Introduction to From Higher Aims to Hired Hands The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession," Introductory Chapters, in: From Higher Aims to Hired Hands The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession, Princeton University Press.
    9. Mats Alvesson & Jörgen Sandberg, 2013. "Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 128-152, January.
    10. Mats Alvesson & Cynthia Hardy & Bill Harley, 2008. "Reflecting on Reflexivity: Reflexive Textual Practices in Organization and Management Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 480-501, May.
    11. Lex Donaldson & Jane Qiu & Ben Nanfeng Luo, 2013. "For Rigour in Organizational Management Theory Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 153-172, January.
    12. Raza Mir & Andrew Watson, 2000. "Strategic management and the philosophy of science: the case for a constructivist methodology," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(9), pages 941-953, September.
    13. Packendorff, Johann, 1995. "Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 319-333, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davies, Andrew & Manning, Stephan & Söderlund, Jonas, 2018. "When neighboring disciplines fail to learn from each other: The case of innovation and project management research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 965-979.
    2. Kotapati Srinivasa Reddy, 2015. "Beating the Odds! Build theory from emerging markets phenomenon and the emergence of case study research—A “Test-Tube” typology," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1037225-103, December.
    3. Wenzel, Matthias & Will, Matthias Georg, 2019. "The communicative constitution of academic fields in the digital age: The case of CSR," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 517-533.
    4. Jesús de Frutos-Belizón & Fernando Martín-Alcázar & Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey, 2021. "The research–practice gap in the field of HRM: a qualitative study from the academic side of the gap," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1465-1515, August.
    5. David S. A. Guttormsen & Fiona Moore, 2023. "‘Thinking About How We Think’: Using Bourdieu’s Epistemic Reflexivity to Reduce Bias in International Business Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 531-559, August.
    6. Meng Lv & Shaohong Feng, 2021. "Temporary teams: current research focus and future directions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Sylvain Lenfle & Jonas Söderlund, 2019. "Large-Scale Innovative Projects as Temporary Trading Zones: Toward an Interlanguage Theory," Post-Print hal-02390158, HAL.
    8. Bullinger, Bernadette & Kieser, Alfred & Schiller-Merkens, Simone, 2015. "Coping with institutional complexity: Responses of management scholars to competing logics in the field of management studies," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 437-450.
    9. Stephen Allen & Ann L. Cunliffe & Mark Easterby-Smith, 2019. "Understanding Sustainability Through the Lens of Ecocentric Radical-Reflexivity: Implications for Management Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 781-795, February.
    10. Andrew Corbett & Joep Cornelissen & Andrew Delios & Bill Harley, 2013. "Strategizing and Operating Through Our Values: JMS at 50," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(8), pages 1349-1357, December.
    11. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan & Hoffmann, Petra & Kowalski, Rita, 2022. "The “research world café” as method of scientific enquiry: Combining rigor with relevance and speed," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 280-296.
    12. Boiral, Olivier & Heras-Saizarbitoria, Iñaki, 2016. "La investigación en dirección y gestión de empresas: ¿una actividad relevante y fundamentada en la realidad?," Revista de Dirección y Administración de Empresas, Universidad del País Vasco - Escuela Universitaria de Estudios Empresariales de San Sebastián.
    13. Michelle Greenwood & Harry J. Van Buren, 2017. "Ideology in HRM Scholarship: Interrogating the Ideological Performativity of ‘New Unitarism’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 663-678, June.
    14. Denis A. Grégoire & Martin X. Noël & Richard Déry & Jean–Pierre Béchard, 2006. "Is There Conceptual Convergence in Entrepreneurship Research? A Co–Citation Analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981–2004," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(3), pages 333-373, May.
    15. Vivien Blanchet & Véronique Magista & Véronique Perret, 2013. "Stop filling in the gaps! Rethinking organizational justice through problematization," Post-Print halshs-00844204, HAL.
    16. Galeazzo, Ambra & Furlan, Andrea & Vinelli, Andrea, 2014. "Understanding environmental-operations integration: The case of pollution prevention projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 149-160.
    17. Mingers, John, 2015. "Helping business schools engage with real problems: The contribution of critical realism and systems thinking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 316-331.
    18. Christina Hoon & Alina M. Baluch, 2020. "The Role of Dialectical Interrogation in Review Studies: Theorizing from What We See Rather Than What We Have Already Seen," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1246-1271, September.
    19. Florence Allard-Poesi & Olivier Germain & Isabelle Huault & Gérard Koenig, 2015. "Are organization studies well inspired? Four views [Les théories des organisations sont-elles bien inspirées ? Quatre regards]," Post-Print hal-01123814, HAL.
    20. Splitter, Violetta, 2019. "Balancing continuity and novelty: The practical relevance of management research from the practitioners' perspective," SocArXiv v4su8, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Project Management Research; Epistemology; Ontology; Social Theory; Relevance; Rigor; Reflexivity;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03563085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.