IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/nfm5j.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Staging Science: Authoritativeness and Fragility of Models and Measurement in the COVID-19 Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Van Dooren, Wouter

    (University of Antwerp)

  • Noordegraaf, Mirko

Abstract

n the COVID‐19 crisis, society pins its hopes on science to play an authoritative role in reducing uncertainty and ambiguity. But is science up to the task? This is far from self‐evident. The demands on science in times of crisis run counter to the values of good, normal science. Crisis science needs to be fast, univocal, personalized, and direct, while normal science is slow, contentious, collective, and sensitive to complexity. Science can only play its atypical role if it is staged in the public arena. Some patterns of staging stand out: personalization, visualization, and connection to lived experiences. So far, the staging of science has been successful, but it is fragile. The COVID‐19 crisis shows the potential of well‐staged forms of alliance between science and policy, but when the general assumption is that scientists will “solve” societal “problems,” the staging of science has gone too far.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Dooren, Wouter & Noordegraaf, Mirko, 2020. "Staging Science: Authoritativeness and Fragility of Models and Measurement in the COVID-19 Crisis," SocArXiv nfm5j, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:nfm5j
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/nfm5j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5f3fd0c8746a8100e81a2354/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/nfm5j?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lodge, Martin, 2011. "Risk, Regulation and Crisis: Comparing National Responses in Food Safety Regulation," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 25-50, February.
    2. Mirko Noordegraaf & Janet Newman, 2011. "Managing in Disorderly Times," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 513-538, May.
    3. Ribeiro, Barbara & Hartley, Sarah & Nerlich, Brigitte & Jaspal, Rusi, 2018. "Media coverage of the Zika crisis in Brazil: The construction of a ‘war’ frame that masked social and gender inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 137-144.
    4. Richard McElreath & Paul E Smaldino, 2015. "Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isabella M. Lami & Stefano Moroni, 2020. "How Can I Help You? Questioning the Role of Evaluation Techniques in Democratic Decision-Making Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Ron Hodges & Eugenio Caperchione & Jan Helden & Christoph Reichard & Daniela Sorrentino, 2022. "The Role of Scientific Expertise in COVID-19 Policy-making: Evidence from Four European Countries," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 249-267, June.
    3. Royston, Sarah & Foulds, Chris & Pasqualino, Roberto & Jones, Aled, 2023. "Masters of the machinery: The politics of economic modelling within European Union energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Chunyu Shi & Tao Xu & Zhihang Ying & Huan Li, 2022. "How Policy Mix Choices Affect the COVID-19 Pandemic Response Outcomes in Chinese Cities: An Empirical Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Giorgio Brosio, Riccardo Pelosi, Roberto Zanola, 2022. "Short-term exit from pandemic restrictions: did European countries' speed converge?," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 19(2), pages 145-159, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelter, Riko, 2022. "Power analysis and type I and type II error rates of Bayesian nonparametric two-sample tests for location-shifts based on the Bayes factor under Cauchy priors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Alexander Frankel & Maximilian Kasy, 2022. "Which Findings Should Be Published?," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38, February.
    3. Vezyridis, Paraskevas, 2024. "‘Kindling the fire’ of NHS patient data exploitations: The care.data controversy in news media discourses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    4. Riko Kelter, 2021. "Analysis of type I and II error rates of Bayesian and frequentist parametric and nonparametric two-sample hypothesis tests under preliminary assessment of normality," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1263-1288, June.
    5. Bekhzod EGAMBERDIEV, 2021. "Household Impact Of The Covid-19 Pandemic From A Development Economics Perspective - A Review," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 15-30, June.
    6. Mauricio González-Forero & Timm Faulwasser & Laurent Lehmann, 2017. "A model for brain life history evolution," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Kelly, Ann H. & Lezaun, Javier & Löwy, Ilana & Matta, Gustavo Corrêa & de Oliveira Nogueira, Carolina & Rabello, Elaine Teixeira, 2020. "Uncertainty in times of medical emergency: Knowledge gaps and structural ignorance during the Brazilian Zika crisis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    8. Morgan, Thomas J. H. & Smaldino, Paul E., 2024. "Author-Paid Publication Fees Corrupt Science and Should Be Abandoned," OSF Preprints 3ez9v, Center for Open Science.
    9. Riko Kelter, 2022. "A New Bayesian Two-Sample t Test and Solution to the Behrens–Fisher Problem Based on Gaussian Mixture Modelling with Known Allocations," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 14(3), pages 380-412, December.
    10. Rangel, Marcos & Nobles, Jenna & Hamoudi, Amar, 2019. "Brazil's Missing Infants: Zika Risk Changes Reproductive Behavior," SocArXiv fu8bp, Center for Open Science.
    11. Wenham, Clare & Abagaro, Camila & Arévalo, Amaral & Coast, Ernestina & Corrêa, Sonia & Cuéllar, Katherine & Leone, Tiziana & Valongueiro, Sandra, 2021. "Analysing the intersection between health emergencies and abortion during Zika in Brazil, El Salvador and Colombia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    12. Merton S. Krause, 2019. "Replication and preregistration," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 2647-2652, September.
    13. Branden B. Johnson & Brendon Swedlow, 2021. "Cultural Theory's Contributions to Risk Analysis: A Thematic Review with Directions and Resources for Further Research," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 429-455, March.
    14. Sarah Curtis & Katie Oven & Jonathan Wistow & Christine Dunn & Lena Dominelli, 2018. "Adaptation to extreme weather events in complex health and social care systems: The example of older people’s services in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 67-91, February.
    15. Isabella M. Nolte & Eric C. Martin & Silke Boenigk, 2011. "Cross-Sectoral Coordination of Disaster Relief," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(6), pages 707-730, August.
    16. Gustavo Magalhães de Oliveira & Paula Sarita Bigio Schnaider & Maria Sylvia Macchione Saes & Gaetano Martino, 2023. "Do private translation mechanisms encourage food safety in dairy production? Evidence from the Brazilian Conseleites," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 862-875, March.
    17. Jeroen van der Heijden, 2021. "Risk as an Approach to Regulatory Governance: An Evidence Synthesis and Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    18. Chang, Yu-Che & Nkambule, Nothando S. & Xiao, Xaviera & Ngerng, Roy Y.L. & Monrouxe, Lynn V., 2021. "Safety net, gateway, market, sport, and war: Exploring how emergency physicians conceptualize and ascribe meaning to emergency care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    19. Leonid Tiokhin & Minhua Yan & Thomas J. H. Morgan, 2021. "Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(7), pages 857-867, July.
    20. Salvador Parrado, 2020. "The culture of risk regulation: Responses to environmental disasters," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 599-615, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:nfm5j. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.