IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04919221.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

BaYaka mothers balance childcare and subsistence tasks during collaborative foraging in Congo Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Amandine E. Visine

    (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology [Leipzig] - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft)

  • Adam H. Boyette

    (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology [Leipzig] - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft)

  • Yann Reische Ouamba

    (UMNG - Université Marien-Ngouabi [Université de Brazzaville] = Marien Ngouabi University [University of Brazzaville])

  • Sheina Lew-Levy

    (Durham University)

  • Mallika Sarma

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Haneul Jang

    (IAST - Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology [Leipzig] - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft)

Abstract

Across cultures, mothers face trade-offs between childcare and other labor. In hunter-gatherer societies, mothers face this choice on a daily basis when deciding either to take infants on foraging trips or to leave them with caregivers in the village. Yet, it remains unclear how the presence of infants in foraging groups constrains mothers' mobility during foraging. Here, we present GPS, energy expenditure and food returns data of 359 foraging trips of 23 BaYaka mothers in the Republic of the Congo. We find that mothers spent more time on out-of-village foraging activities when they took infants along, compared to when they left infants behind. However, infant presence in foraging groups does not affect mothers' travel distance, travel range, energy expenditure or food returns. Regardless of infant presence, women travel longer and further in a larger area when foraging in groups, compared to when foraging alone, especially in groups with more adults, females and both kin and non-kin. Our results suggest that BaYaka mothers develop ways to accommodate childcare with foraging activities by combining individual-level and group-level behavioural strategies. Our study highlights that group foraging may allow mothers with infants to maintain high mobility, which may have been a key to human range expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Amandine E. Visine & Adam H. Boyette & Yann Reische Ouamba & Sheina Lew-Levy & Mallika Sarma & Haneul Jang, 2024. "BaYaka mothers balance childcare and subsistence tasks during collaborative foraging in Congo Basin," Post-Print hal-04919221, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04919221
    DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75467-1
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04919221v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04919221v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41598-024-75467-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard McElreath & Paul E Smaldino, 2015. "Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Piperata, Barbara Ann, 2008. "Forty days and forty nights: A biocultural perspective on postpartum practices in the Amazon," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1094-1103, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jang, Haneul & Redhead, Daniel, 2025. "Transmission Networks of Long-term and Short-term Knowledge in a Foraging Society," TSE Working Papers 25-1611, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Frankel & Maximilian Kasy, 2022. "Which Findings Should Be Published?," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38, February.
    2. Elena Briones Alonso & Lara Cockx & Jo Swinnen, 2017. "Culture and food security," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven 591898, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    3. Kelter, Riko, 2022. "Power analysis and type I and type II error rates of Bayesian nonparametric two-sample tests for location-shifts based on the Bayes factor under Cauchy priors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Kasy, Maximilian & Frankel, Alexander, 2018. "Which findings should be published?," MetaArXiv mbvz3_v1, Center for Open Science.
    5. Riko Kelter, 2021. "Analysis of type I and II error rates of Bayesian and frequentist parametric and nonparametric two-sample hypothesis tests under preliminary assessment of normality," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1263-1288, June.
    6. Van Dooren, Wouter & Noordegraaf, Mirko, 2020. "Staging Science: Authoritativeness and Fragility of Models and Measurement in the COVID-19 Crisis," SocArXiv nfm5j_v1, Center for Open Science.
    7. Mauricio González-Forero & Timm Faulwasser & Laurent Lehmann, 2017. "A model for brain life history evolution," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Morgan, Thomas J. H. & Smaldino, Paul E., 2024. "Author-Paid Publication Fees Corrupt Science and Should Be Abandoned," OSF Preprints 3ez9v, Center for Open Science.
    9. Riko Kelter, 2022. "A New Bayesian Two-Sample t Test and Solution to the Behrens–Fisher Problem Based on Gaussian Mixture Modelling with Known Allocations," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 14(3), pages 380-412, December.
    10. Leonid Tiokhin & Minhua Yan & Thomas J. H. Morgan, 2021. "Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(7), pages 857-867, July.
    11. Merton S. Krause, 2019. "Replication and preregistration," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 2647-2652, September.
    12. repec:lic:licosd:39817 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Morgan, Thomas J. H. & Smaldino, Paul E., 2024. "Author-Paid Publication Fees Corrupt Science and Should Be Abandoned," OSF Preprints 3ez9v_v1, Center for Open Science.
    14. Van Dooren, Wouter & Noordegraaf, Mirko, 2020. "Staging Science: Authoritativeness and Fragility of Models and Measurement in the COVID-19 Crisis," SocArXiv nfm5j, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04919221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.