IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/8g25k.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Parenting leave policy data gaps: a comparative critical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Dobrotic, Ivana

    (University of Zagreb)

  • Arnalds, Ásdís Aðalbjörg
  • Dimitrova, Elitsa
  • Son, Keonhi
  • Engeman, Cassandra
  • Valentova, Marie
  • Mercan, Murat A.
  • Ilieva, Kalina
  • Makay, Zsuzsanna
  • Reimer, Thordis

Abstract

The COST Action „Parental Leave Policies & Social Sustainability” (CA21150) aims to advance and disseminate knowledge about the significance of paid parental leave policies (PPL) for sustainable societies. When assessing whether leave policies are moving towards the social sustainability goals of gender equality, reducing poverty, and increasing health and well-being, it is important to have available data that allows for analysis of inequalities in eligibility, take-up, and outcomes of PPL. Therefore, Working Group 5 (WG5) of CA21150 critically assessed (1) existing comparative surveys, (2) publicly available comparative leave policy indicators databases, and (3) the availability of administrative data at the national level and examples of existing national surveys on PPL use. The aim is to identify PPL data gaps and facilitate thinking about solutions to overcome these gaps and develop recommendations for advancing the data. This report presents the findings of the critical assessment of data availability.

Suggested Citation

  • Dobrotic, Ivana & Arnalds, Ásdís Aðalbjörg & Dimitrova, Elitsa & Son, Keonhi & Engeman, Cassandra & Valentova, Marie & Mercan, Murat A. & Ilieva, Kalina & Makay, Zsuzsanna & Reimer, Thordis, 2023. "Parenting leave policy data gaps: a comparative critical analysis," SocArXiv 8g25k, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:8g25k
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8g25k
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/656f090d5022f625fa88ea19/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/8g25k?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petteri Eerola & Johanna Lammi-Taskula & Margaret O’Brien & Johanna Hietamäki & Eija Räikkönen, 2019. "Fathers’ Leave Take-Up in Finland: Motivations and Barriers in a Complex Nordic Leave Scheme," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(4), pages 21582440198, October.
    2. Alison Koslowski, 2021. "Capturing the Gender Gap in the Scope of Parenting Related Leave Policies Across Nations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 250-261.
    3. Kenneth Nelson & Daniel Fredriksson & Tomas Korpi & Walter Korpi & Joakim Palme & Ola Sjöberg, 2020. "The Social Policy Indicators (SPIN) database," International Journal of Social Welfare, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 285-289, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Czarnecki, Krzysztof, 2022. "Political party families and student social rights," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(3), pages 317-332.
    2. Thomas Biegert & David Brady & Lena Hipp, 2022. "Cross-National Variation in the Relationship between Welfare Generosity and Single Mother Employment," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 702(1), pages 37-54, July.
    3. Irene DINGELDEY & Jean‐Yves GERLITZ, 2022. "Not just black and white, but different shades of grey: Legal segmentation and its effect on labour market segmentation in Europe," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(4), pages 593-613, December.
    4. Katharina Wesolowski & Sunnee Billingsley & Gerda Neyer, 2020. "Disentangling the complexity of family policies: SPIN data with an application to Lithuania and Sweden, 1995–2015," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(42), pages 1235-1262.
    5. Smyth, Emer & Russell, Helen, 2021. "Fathers and children from infancy to middle childhood," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS130.
    6. Laure Doctrinal, 2023. "What Drives Long-Term Trends in Newly Retired Women’s and Men’s Economic Independence? An Analysis of Contemporary and Historical Determinants," LIS Working papers 861, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    7. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Sebastian Kohl & Florian Müller, 2023. "Government-Made House Price Bubbles? Austerity, Homeownership, Rental, and Credit Liberalization Policies and the “Irrational Exuberance” on Housing Markets," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2061, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Biegert, Thomas & Brady, David & Hipp, Lena, 2022. "Cross-National Variation in the Relationship between Welfare Generosity and Single Mother Employment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 702(1), pages 37-54.
    9. Katri Otonkorpi‐Lehtoranta & Milla Salin & Mia Hakovirta & Anniina Kaittila, 2022. "Gendering boundary work: Experiences of work–family practices among Finnish working parents during COVID‐19 lockdown," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1952-1968, November.
    10. Allan Puur & Sanan Abdullayev & Martin Klesment & Mark Gortfelder, 2023. "Parental Leave and Fertility: Individual-Level Responses in the Tempo and Quantum of Second and Third Births," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-28, December.
    11. Ose, Solveig Osborg & Kaspersen, Silje Lill & Leinonen, Taina & Verstappen, Suzanne & de Rijk, Angelique & Spasova, Slavina & Hultqvist, Sara & Nørup, Iben & Pálsson, Jón R. & Blume, Andreas & Paterno, 2022. "Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees: A comparison of nine north-western European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(7), pages 619-631.
    12. Sonja Blum & Ivana Dobrotić, 2021. "The Inclusiveness of Social Rights: The Case of Leave Policies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 222-226.
    13. Adeline Otto & Alzbeta Bártová & Wim Van Lancker, 2021. "Measuring the Generosity of Parental Leave Policies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 238-249.
    14. Bea Cantillon;, 2022. "POVERTY AND THE TRAGEDY OF THE WELFARE STATE Seven terms for a new social contract," Working Papers 2206, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:8g25k. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.