IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v126y2022i7p619-631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees: A comparison of nine north-western European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ose, Solveig Osborg
  • Kaspersen, Silje Lill
  • Leinonen, Taina
  • Verstappen, Suzanne
  • de Rijk, Angelique
  • Spasova, Slavina
  • Hultqvist, Sara
  • Nørup, Iben
  • Pálsson, Jón R.
  • Blume, Andreas
  • Paternoga, Mike
  • Kalseth, Jorid

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has revealed the importance of social protection systems, including income security, when health problems arise. The aims of this study are to compare the follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees across nine European countries, and to conduct a qualitative assessment of the differences with respect to burden and responsibility sharing between the social protection system, employers and employees. The tendency highlighted is that countries with shorter employer periods of sick-pay typically have stricter follow-up responsibility for employers because, in practice, they become gatekeepers of the public sickness benefit scheme. In Germany and the UK, employers have few requirements for follow-up compared with the Nordic countries because they bear most of the costs of sickness absence themselves. The same applies in Iceland, where employers carry most of the costs and have no obligation to follow up sick-listed employees. The situation in the Netherlands is paradoxical: employers have strict obligations in the follow-up regime even though they cover all the costs of the sick-leave themselves. During the pandemic, the majority of countries have adjusted their sick-pay system and increased coverage to reduce the risk of spreading Covid-19 because employees are going to work sick or when they should self-quarantine, except for the Netherlands and Belgium, which considered that the current schemes were already sufficient to reduce that risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Ose, Solveig Osborg & Kaspersen, Silje Lill & Leinonen, Taina & Verstappen, Suzanne & de Rijk, Angelique & Spasova, Slavina & Hultqvist, Sara & Nørup, Iben & Pálsson, Jón R. & Blume, Andreas & Paterno, 2022. "Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees: A comparison of nine north-western European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(7), pages 619-631.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:126:y:2022:i:7:p:619-631
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016885102200104X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Barnay, 2016. "Health, work and working conditions: a review of the European economic literature," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(6), pages 693-709, July.
    2. van der Wel, Kjetil A. & Dahl, Espen & Thielen, Karsten, 2011. "Social inequalities in ‘sickness’: European welfare states and non-employment among the chronically ill," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(11), pages 1608-1617.
    3. Tim A. Barmby & Marco G. Ercolani & John G. Treble, 2002. "Sickness Absence: An International Comparison," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(480), pages 315-331, June.
    4. Pierre Koning & Maarten Lindeboom, 2015. "The Rise and Fall of Disability Insurance Enrollment in the Netherlands," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(2), pages 151-172, Spring.
    5. Rigmar Osterkamp & Oliver Röhn, 2007. "Being on Sick Leave: Possible Explanations for Differences of Sick-leave Days Across Countries," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 53(1), pages 97-114, March.
    6. Sabine Chaupain-Guillot & Olivier Guillot, 2017. "Sickness Benefit Rules and Work Absence: An Empirical Study Based on European Data," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 127(6), pages 1109-1137.
    7. Mårten Palme & Mats Persson, 2020. "Sick Pay Insurance And Sickness Absence: Some European Cross‐Country Observations And A Review Of Previous Research," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 85-108, February.
    8. Alex Bryson & Harald Dale-Olsen, 2019. "The Role of Employer-provided Sick Pay in Britain and Norway," Research in Labor Economics, in: Health and Labor Markets, volume 47, pages 227-252, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    9. Sabine Chaupain-Guillot & Olivier Guillot, 2017. "Sickness Benefit Rules and Work Absence : An Empirical Study Based on European Data [Règles d’indemnisation des arrêts maladie et absences au travail : une étude empirique à partir de données europ," Post-Print hal-02167223, HAL.
    10. Anke SCHLIWEN & Alison EARLE & Jeff HAYES & S. Jody HEYMANN, 2011. "The administration and financing of paid sick leave," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 150(1-2), pages 43-62, June.
    11. Andrea Brandolini & Eliana Viviano, 2016. "Behind and beyond the (head count) employment rate," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(3), pages 657-681, June.
    12. Xenia Scheil-Adlung & Lydia Sandner, 2010. "Evidence on paid sick leave: Observations in times of crisis," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 45(5), pages 313-321, September.
    13. Pierre Koning, 2016. "Privatizing sick pay: Does it work?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 324-324, December.
    14. Kenneth Nelson & Daniel Fredriksson & Tomas Korpi & Walter Korpi & Joakim Palme & Ola Sjöberg, 2020. "The Social Policy Indicators (SPIN) database," International Journal of Social Welfare, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 285-289, July.
    15. Eliana Viviano & Andrea Brandolini, 2018. "Measuring employment and unemployment," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 445-445, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Svetlana Solovieva & Karina Undem & Daniel Falkstedt & Gun Johansson & Petter Kristensen & Jacob Pedersen & Eira Viikari-Juntura & Taina Leinonen & Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum, 2022. "Utilizing a Nordic Crosswalk for Occupational Coding in an Analysis on Occupation-Specific Prolonged Sickness Absence among 7 Million Employees in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-24, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. René Böheim & Thomas Leoni, 2014. "Firms' Sickness Costs and Workers' Sickness Absences," NBER Working Papers 20305, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Sebastien Menard, 2021. "Optimal sickness benefits in a principal–agent model," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(1), pages 5-33, July.
    3. René Böheim & Thomas Leoni, 2020. "Do Employees’ Sickness Absences React to a Change in Costs for Firms? Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 122(2), pages 553-581, April.
    4. Carlo Alberto Biscardo & Alessandro Bucciol & Paolo Pertile, 2019. "Job sick leave: Detecting opportunistic behavior," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 373-386, March.
    5. Svetlana Solovieva & Karina Undem & Daniel Falkstedt & Gun Johansson & Petter Kristensen & Jacob Pedersen & Eira Viikari-Juntura & Taina Leinonen & Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum, 2022. "Utilizing a Nordic Crosswalk for Occupational Coding in an Analysis on Occupation-Specific Prolonged Sickness Absence among 7 Million Employees in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Konstantinos, Pouliakas & Ioannis, Theodossiou, 2010. "An Inquiry Into the Theory, Causes and Consequences of Monitoring Indicators of Health and Safety At Work," MPRA Paper 20336, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Stephanie Prümer & Claus Schnabel, 2019. "Questioning the Stereotype of the “Malingering Bureaucrat”: Absence from Work in the Public and Private Sector in Germany," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 570-603, November.
    8. Baert, Stijn, 2021. "The iceberg decomposition: A parsimonious way to map the health of labour markets," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 350-365.
    9. Carlo Alberto Biscardo & Alessandro Bucciol & Paolo Pertile, 2015. "Who should monitor job sick leave?," Working Papers 18/2015, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    10. Koning, Pierre & Muller, Paul & Prudon, Roger, 2022. "Why Do Temporary Workers Have Higher Disability Insurance Risks Than Permanent Workers?," IZA Discussion Papers 15173, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. John Komlos, 2019. "The Real U.S. Unemployment Rate Is Twice the Official Rate, and the Phillips Curve," CESifo Working Paper Series 7859, CESifo.
    12. Fontanari, Claudia & Palumbo, Antonella & Salvatori, Chiara, 2022. "The updated Okun method for estimation of potential output with alternative measures of labor underutilization," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 158-178.
    13. Evangelos C. Alexopoulos & Georgios Merekoulias & Dimitra Tanagra & Eleni C. Konstantinou & Efi Mikelatou & Eleni Jelastopulu, 2012. "Sickness Absence in the Private Sector of Greece: Comparing Shipyard Industry and National Insurance Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
    14. Sabine Chaupain-Guillot & Olivier Guillot, 2010. "Les déterminants individuels des absences au travail : une comparaison européenne," Working Papers of BETA 2010-17, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    15. Thomas Leoni & Helmut Mahringer, 2008. "Fehlzeitenreport 2008. Krankheits- und unfallbedingte Fehlzeiten in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 34220.
    16. Hullegie, Patrick & Koning, Pierre, 2018. "How disability insurance reforms change the consequences of health shocks on income and employment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 134-146.
    17. François-Olivier Baudot, 2022. "Impact of Benzodiazepine Use on the Risk of Occupational Accident," Erudite Working Paper 2022-02, Erudite.
    18. Fabian Duarte & Srikanth Kadiyala & Samuel H. Masters & David Powell, 2017. "The Effect of the 2009 Influenza Pandemic on Absence from Work," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(12), pages 1682-1695, December.
    19. repec:lan:wpaper:2935 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Thomas Barnay & Éric Defebvre, 2019. "Gender Differences in the Influence of Mental Health on Job Retention," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 33(4), pages 507-532, December.
    21. Emmanuel Duguet & Christine Le Clainche, 2020. "The Socioeconomic and Gender Impacts of Health Events on Employment Transitions in France: A Panel Data Study," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(3), pages 449-483.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:126:y:2022:i:7:p:619-631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.