IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/km6r4_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Emotion Regulation Contagion Drives Reduction in Negative Intergroup Emotions

Author

Listed:
  • Pinus, Michael

    (Hebrew University of Jerusalem)

  • Cao, Yajun
  • Halperin, Eran
  • Coman, Alin
  • Gross, James
  • Goldenberg, Amit

    (Harvard University)

Abstract

Emotions are amplified when they take place in groups. This creates a unique challenge when one wishes to regulate groups’ emotions, especially if treating every person is infeasible. One response is to treat a fraction of a group, and then hope the treatment will spread to other group members. To test the viability of this option, we designed an experiment to examine the impact of emotion regulation applied to different proportions of groups of six Israeli participants (N = 2,659) who shared real-time responses to negative emotions-inducing political stimuli. Before interacting with each other, we treated different proportions of each group with an emotion regulation intervention called cognitive reappraisal, which involved teaching participants to reinterpret events to reduce negative emotions. The results showed that as the proportion of participants who received the treatment increased, there was a reduction in emotions both within the treated and non-treated participants. Furthermore, targeting above 40% of participants resulted in reliable group emotional change. Using semantic projection analysis, we validated the contagion of reappraisal language. These findings shed light on the conditions that enable collective emotion regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pinus, Michael & Cao, Yajun & Halperin, Eran & Coman, Alin & Gross, James & Goldenberg, Amit, 2023. "Emotion Regulation Contagion Drives Reduction in Negative Intergroup Emotions," OSF Preprints km6r4_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:km6r4_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/km6r4_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6537f2af87852d11dda590b3/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/km6r4_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenny J W Liu & Natalie Ein & Julia Gervasio & Kristin Vickers, 2019. "The efficacy of stress reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity: A meta-analysis and systematic review of existing evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Ke Wang & Amit Goldenberg & Charles A. Dorison & Jeremy K. Miller & Andero Uusberg & Jennifer S. Lerner & James J. Gross & Bamikole Bamikole Agesin & Márcia Bernardo & Olatz Campos & Luis Eudave & Kar, 2021. "A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 1089-1110, August.
    3. Cho, Youngsang & Hwang, Junseok & Lee, Daeho, 2012. "Identification of effective opinion leaders in the diffusion of technological innovation: A social network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 97-106.
    4. Danica Vukadinović Greetham & Abhijit Sengupta & Robert Hurling & Joy Wilkinson, 2015. "Interventions In Social Networks: Impact On Mood And Network Dynamics," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03n04), pages 1-32.
    5. Sean J. Taylor & Lev Muchnik & Madhav Kumar & Sinan Aral, 2023. "Identity effects in social media," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 27-37, January.
    6. Gabriel Grand & Idan Asher Blank & Francisco Pereira & Evelina Fedorenko, 2022. "Semantic projection recovers rich human knowledge of multiple object features from word embeddings," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 975-987, July.
    7. David S. Yeager & Paul Hanselman & Gregory M. Walton & Jared S. Murray & Robert Crosnoe & Chandra Muller & Elizabeth Tipton & Barbara Schneider & Chris S. Hulleman & Cintia P. Hinojosa & David Paunesk, 2019. "A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement," Nature, Nature, vol. 573(7774), pages 364-369, September.
    8. Douglas Guilbeault & Damon Centola, 2021. "Topological measures for identifying and predicting the spread of complex contagions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pinus, Michael & Halperin, Eran & Cao, Yajun & Coman, Alin & Gross, James & Goldenberg, Amit, 2023. "Emotion Regulation Contagion," OSF Preprints km6r4, Center for Open Science.
    2. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.
    3. Thomas S. Dee & Emily K. Penner, 2021. "My Brother's Keeper? The Impact of Targeted Educational Supports," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 1171-1196, September.
    4. Hermundur Sigmundsson & Monika Haga & Magdalena Elnes & Benjamin Holen Dybendal & Fanny Hermundsdottir, 2022. "Motivational Factors Are Varying across Age Groups and Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Muhammad Naeem Sarwar & Zahida Javed & Muhammad Shahid Farooq & Muhammad Faizan Nazar & Shahbaz Hassan Wasti & Intzar Hussain Butt & Ghulam Jillani Ansari & Rabia Basri & Sumaira Kulsoom & Zaka Ullah, 2024. "Impact of a Digital Growth Mindset on Enhancing the Motivation and Performance of Chemistry Students: A Non-Cognitive Approach," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Kerstin Grosch & Simone Haeckl & Martin G. Kocher, 2022. "Closing the Gender STEM Gap - A Large-Scale Randomized-Controlled Trial in Elementary Schools," CESifo Working Paper Series 9907, CESifo.
    7. Daniel Reisinger & Fabian Tschofenig & Raven Adam & Marie Lisa Kogler & Manfred Füllsack & Fabian Veider & Georg Jäger, 2024. "Patterns of stability in complex contagions," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1895-1911, October.
    8. Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda & Giovanni Petri & Pablo Martin Rodriguez & Yamir Moreno, 2023. "Multistability, intermittency, and hybrid transitions in social contagion models on hypergraphs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Hermes, Henning & Huschens, Martin & Rothlauf, Franz & Schunk, Daniel, 2021. "Motivating low-achievers—Relative performance feedback in primary schools," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 45-59.
    10. Gagliardi, Dimitri & Ramlogan, Ronnie & Navarra, Pierluigi & Dello Russo, Cinzia, 2018. "Diffusion of complementary evolving pharmaceutical innovations: The case of Abacavir and its pharmacogenetic companion diagnostic in Italy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 223-233.
    11. Grosch, Kerstin & Häckl, Simone & Kocher, Martin G., 2022. "Closing the gender STEM gap," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 329, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    12. David J. Deming, 2022. "Four Facts about Human Capital," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 75-102, Summer.
    13. Silvia Coderoni & Roberto Esposti & Alessandro Varacca, 2024. "How Differently Do Farms Respond to Agri-environmental Policies? A Probabilistic Machine-Learning Approach," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 100(2), pages 370-397.
    14. Flory, Jeffrey A. & Leibbrandt, Andreas & Rott, Christina & Stoddard, Olga B., 2021. "Signals from On High and the Power of Growth Mindset: A Natural Field Experiment in Attracting Minorities to High-Profile Positions," IZA Discussion Papers 14383, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Elizabeth Tipton, 2021. "Beyond generalization of the ATE: Designing randomized trials to understand treatment effect heterogeneity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(2), pages 504-521, April.
    16. Yujun Jiang & Huying Liu & Yuna Yao & Qiang Li & Yingji Li, 2023. "The Positive Effects of Growth Mindset on Students’ Intention toward Self-Regulated Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Nasirian, Farzaneh & Mahdavi Pajouh, Foad & Balasundaram, Balabhaskar, 2020. "Detecting a most closeness-central clique in complex networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 461-475.
    18. Fatima Canseco-Lopez & Francesc Miralles, 2023. "Adoption of Plant-Based Diets: A Process Perspective on Adopters’ Cognitive Propensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-29, May.
    19. De Xia & Nian Xia & Yishi Zhang & Jiwei Xiong & Ruilin Zhu, 2022. "Diffusion Path Identification of Public Opinion Involving Enterprise Green Technology Adoption: An Interpretive-Structural-Modeling-Based Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, February.
    20. Teng Yu & Ai Ping Teoh & Chengliang Wang & Qing Bian, 2024. "Convenient or risky? Investigating the behavioral intention to use facial recognition payment in smart hospitals," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:km6r4_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.