IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/hkrsm.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact of Corporate Commitments to Source Cage-Free Eggs on Layer Hen Housing

Author

Listed:
  • Mendez, Samara
  • Peacock, Jacob

    (The Humane League Labs)

  • Butner, Matt

Abstract

Over the last decade, hundreds of companies around the world have committed to source cage-free eggs by 2025 or earlier. Commitments sometimes result from conversation with groups advocating to improve the treatment of animals, as cage-free housing is widely believed to provide better welfare for egg-laying hens. When conversation does not work, advocacy groups may run a campaign of public pressure, including protests or shaming in the media, which usually leads to a commitment. In this preregistration, we describe a detailed plan to use data from many countries on the share of hens living cage-free to understand the effect of cage-free commitments. We expect that commitments will shift the industry from caged to cage-free housing for hens. To test this, we will look at data from before and after commitments were made and in countries with and without commitments. We will also consider other factors, like changes in the law and illnesses that kill hens, that could affect how they are housed. We suspect that commitments and housing affect each other, so we will use advocacy groups' campaigns as a statistical tool to further clarify the cause-and-effect relationship. When we complete the planned study, it will provide thorough evidence on the impact of cage-free commitments, which might be useful to advocacy groups, companies making commitments, and the egg industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Mendez, Samara & Peacock, Jacob & Butner, Matt, 2020. "Impact of Corporate Commitments to Source Cage-Free Eggs on Layer Hen Housing," OSF Preprints hkrsm, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:hkrsm
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/hkrsm
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5f3ff779bacde8010d33bb39/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/hkrsm?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Pan, 2001. "Akaike's Information Criterion in Generalized Estimating Equations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 120-125, March.
    2. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2019. "Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 137-150.
    3. Chikako Oka, 2010. "Channels of buyer influence and labor standard compliance: the case of Cambodia's garment sector," Post-Print hal-02952274, HAL.
    4. Chikako Oka, 2010. "Accounting for the Gaps in Labour Standard Compliance: The Role of Reputation-Conscious Buyers in the Cambodian Garment Industry," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 22(1), pages 59-78, February.
    5. Papke, Leslie E. & Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2008. "Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1-2), pages 121-133, July.
    6. Reinhard Schunck, 2013. "Within and between estimates in random-effects models: Advantages and drawbacks of correlated random effects and hybrid models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 13(1), pages 65-76, March.
    7. Anna, Petrenko, 2016. "Мaркування готової продукції як складова частина інформаційного забезпечення маркетингової діяльності підприємств овочепродуктового підкомплексу," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 2(1), March.
    8. Mendez, Samara, 2019. "US Egg Production Data Set," OSF Preprints wta3q, Center for Open Science.
    9. Nordén, Anna & Coria, Jessica & Villalobos, Laura, 2016. "Evaluation of the Impact of Forest Certification on Environmental Outcomes in Sweden," Working Papers in Economics 657, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    10. Bell, Andrew & Jones, Kelvyn, 2015. "Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 133-153, January.
    11. Andrew Bell & Malcolm Fairbrother & Kelvyn Jones, 2019. "Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 1051-1074, March.
    12. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2004. "Estimating average partial effects under conditional moment independence assumptions," CeMMAP working papers CWP03/04, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    13. Riju Joshi & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2019. "Correlated Random Effects Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables and Unbalanced Panels," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 134, pages 243-268.
    14. Nosek, Brian A. & Ebersole, Charles R. & DeHaven, Alexander Carl & Mellor, David Thomas, 2018. "The Preregistration Revolution," OSF Preprints 2dxu5, Center for Open Science.
    15. Heise, Heinke & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2016. "What do consumers think about farm animal welfare in modern agriculture? Attitudes and shopping behaviour," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(3), November.
    16. Anderson, Christa M. & Asner, Gregory P. & Lambin, Eric F., 2019. "Lack of association between deforestation and either sustainability commitments or fines in private concessions in the Peruvian Amazon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peacock, Jacob & Mendez, Samara, 2020. "Measuring Better Chicken Commitment–Compliant Chicken Supply," OSF Preprints 8v2k9, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonella Francesca Cicchiello & Serena Gallo & Stefano Monferrà, 2023. "Financing the cultural and creative industries through crowdfunding: the role of national cultural dimensions and policies," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 47(1), pages 133-175, March.
    2. Zhou, Shan & Solomon, Barry D., 2021. "The interplay between renewable portfolio standards and voluntary green power markets in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 720-729.
    3. Arnd Kölling & Claus Schnabel, 2022. "Owners, external managers and industrial relations in German establishments," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 424-443, June.
    4. Dilmaghani, Maryam, 2021. "The gender gap in competitive chess across countries: Commanding queens in command economies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 425-441.
    5. Becker, Annette & Hottenrott, Hanna & Mukherjee, Anwesha, 2022. "Division of labor in R&D? Firm size and specialization in corporate research," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1-23.
    6. Irina B. Grafova & Alan C. Monheit & Rizie Kumar, 2020. "How Do Economic Shocks Affect Family Health Care Spending Burdens?," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 442-457, September.
    7. Thomas Slijper & Yann de Mey & P Marijn Poortvliet & Miranda P M Meuwissen, 2022. "Quantifying the resilience of European farms using FADN," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 121-150.
    8. Arnd Kölling, 2022. "Monopsony power and the demand for low-skilled workers," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(2), pages 377-395, June.
    9. Carpa, Nur & Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada, 2022. "The impact of global value chain participation on income inequality," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 269-290.
    10. Trong‐Anh Trinh & Alberto Posso & Simon Feeny, 2020. "Child Labor and Rainfall Deviation: Panel Data Evidence from Rural Vietnam," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 58(1), pages 63-76, March.
    11. Maria Simona Andreano & Roberto Benedetti & Federica Piersimoni & Giovanni Savio, 2021. "Mapping Poverty of Latin American and Caribbean Countries from Heaven Through Night-Light Satellite Images," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 533-562, August.
    12. Pathak, Santosh & Wang, Hua & Adusumilli, Naveen C., 2022. "Contract Non-compliance and Moral Hazard: Evidence from Cost-share Programs in Louisiana, USA," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322324, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Makate, Clifton & Angelsen, Arild & Holden, Stein Terje & Westengen, Ola Tveitereid, 2022. "Crops in crises: Shocks shape smallholders' diversification in rural Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Baum, Christopher F. & Lööf, Hans & Stephan, Andreas & Viklund-Ros, Ingrid, 2022. "Innovation by start-up firms: The role of the board of directors for knowledge spillovers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    15. Nirup Menon & Anant Mishra & Shun Ye, 2020. "Beyond Related Experience: Upstream vs. Downstream Experience in Innovation Contest Platforms with Interdependent Problem Domains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1045-1065, September.
    16. Myrna, Olena, 2023. "Competition in online land lease auctions in Ukraine: Reduced-form estimation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    17. Christopher F. Baum & Hans Lööf & Andreas Stephan & Ingrid Viklund-Ros, 2019. "Innovation by start-up firms: The influence of the board of directors for knowledge spillovers," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 988, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 31 Aug 2021.
    18. Gupta, Shagufta & Ghosh, Poulomi & Sridhar, V., 2022. "Impact of data trade restrictions on IT services export: A cross-country analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9).
    19. Hans Lööf & Ingrid Viklund‐Ros, 2020. "Board of directors and export spillovers: What is the impact on extensive margins of trade?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 1188-1215, May.
    20. Ragasa, Catherine, 2020. "Effectiveness of the lead farmer approach in agricultural extension service provision: Nationally representative panel data analysis in Malawi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:hkrsm. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.