IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/cgfmz.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Das Transformationspotential des deutschen Sustainable Finance Diskurses: Eine Einschätzung auf Basis von Logiken und Frames

Author

Listed:
  • Dimmelmeier, Andreas
  • Egerer, Elsa

Abstract

Against the backdrop of a simultaneous dynamization of sustainable finance and intensifying environmental and social crises, the following article carries out an analysis of the transformation potential of the sustainable finance discourse that is present in German governance discussions. The discourse is illustrated through a content analysis of the German government's Sustainable Finance Strategy and the final report of the first Sustainable Finance Advisory Council. In order to evaluate the transformation potential, a frame analysis is conducted. Subsequently, the analyzed frames are linked to the concept of institutional logics, which allows for an assessment of their transformation potential. The article comes to the conclusion that the governance discourse on sustainable finance in Germany is dominated by an integrative frame, which describes sustainable finance per se as desirable, and a frame, which emphasizes financial risks. With regard to institutional logics, a state logic that is motivated by location specific competitiveness policies and a financial market logic dominate. This is consistent with the interpretation that the mainstreaming of sustainable finance is accompanied by an increasingly financialized discourse that derives its goals largely from its own system logics, i.e. those inherent in the financial system. Based on the analysis, the article concludes that the transformation potential of the assessed governance discourse on Sustainable Finance in Germany is relatively low.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimmelmeier, Andreas & Egerer, Elsa, 2023. "Das Transformationspotential des deutschen Sustainable Finance Diskurses: Eine Einschätzung auf Basis von Logiken und Frames," OSF Preprints cgfmz, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cgfmz
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/cgfmz
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/63dff49b1e968605bdb25d11/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/cgfmz?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniela Gabor, 2021. "The Wall Street Consensus," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 429-459, May.
    2. Dirk Schoenmaker, 2017. "Investing for the common good- a sustainable finance framework," Essays and Lectures 21249, Bruegel.
    3. Mattias Wahlström & Magnus Wennerhag & Christopher Rootes, 2013. "Framing “The Climate Issue”: Patterns of Participation and Prognostic Frames among Climate Summit Protesters," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 13(4), pages 101-122, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Rıza Güngen, 2023. "New Multilateral Development Banks and Green Lending: Approaching Scalar Complexities in the Global South," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(2), pages 251-279, March.
    2. Brendan Whitty & Jessica Sklair & Paul Robert Gilbert & Emma Mawdsley & Jo‐Anna Russon & Olivia Taylor, 2023. "Outsourcing the Business of Development: The Rise of For‐profit Consultancies in the UK Aid Sector," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(4), pages 892-917, July.
    3. Dimitar Anguelov, 2024. "State‐owned Enterprises and the Politics of Financializing Infrastructure Development in Indonesia: De‐risking at the Limit?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(3), pages 493-529, May.
    4. Petr Jakubik & Sibel Uguz, 2021. "Impact of green bond policies on insurers: evidence from the European equity market," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 45(2), pages 381-393, April.
    5. Salleh, Alia, 2023. "Does the culture of property normalise eviction and demolition? The case of Kampung Sungai Baru, Kuala Lumpur," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118023, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Anis Chowdhury & Jomo Kwame Sundaram, 2023. "Chronicles of Debt Crises Foretold," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(5), pages 994-1030, September.
    7. Magdalena Ziolo & Iwona Bak & Anna Spoz & Beata Zofia Filipiak & Jaroslaw Kozuba & Piotr Niedzielski, 2020. "A Sustainable Approach for Financial and Energy Markets: The Perspective of OECD European Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 462-487.
    8. Valenzuela, Jose Maria, 2023. "State ownership in liberal economic governance? De-risking private investment in the electricity sector in Mexico," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    9. Maria Stella Righettini, 2021. "Framing Sustainability. Evidence from Participatory Forums to Taylor the Regional 2030 Agenda to Local Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Albert Sanghoon Park, 2023. "Building resilience knowledge for sustainable development: Insights from development studies," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2023-33, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Nadi Serhan Aydın & Martin Rainer, 2022. "Asset-backed stable numéraire approach for sustainable valuation," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 360-374, April.
    12. Sinclair, Lian & Coe, Neil M., 2024. "Critical mineral strategies in Australia: Industrial upgrading without environmental or social upgrading," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Boissinot, Jean & Goulard, Sylvie & Salin, Mathilde & Svartzman, Romain & Weber, Pierre-François, 2022. "Aligning financial and monetary policies with the concept of double materiality: rationales, proposals and challenges," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Joost Moor, 2022. "Prioritizing adaptation and mitigation in the climate movement: evidence from a cross-national protest survey of the Global Climate Strike, 2019," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Surbhi Gupta & Anil Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Evolution of infrastructure as an asset class: a systematic literature review and thematic analysis," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 173-200, May.
    16. Dirk Schoenmaker, 2018. "Sustainable investing- How to do it," Policy Contributions 28553, Bruegel.
    17. Dimmelmeier, Andreas, 2021. "Sustainable Finance as a Contested Concept: Tracing the Evolution of Five Frames Between 1998 and 2018," SocArXiv 7jhgp, Center for Open Science.
    18. Magdalena Ziolo & Krzysztof Kluza & Anna Spoz, 2019. "Impact of Sustainable Financial and Economic Development on Greenhouse Gas Emission in the Developed and Converging Economies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-30, November.
    19. Eugenia C. Heldt & Thomas Dörfler, 2022. "Orchestrating private investors for development: How the World Bank revitalizes," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1382-1398, October.
    20. Magdalena Ziolo & Iwona Bak & Anna Spoz & Beata Zofia Filipiak & Jaroslaw Kozuba & Piotr Niedzielski, 2020. "Financial and Energy Markets - A Sustainable Approach. Perspective of European Countries Belonging to the OECD," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 491-511.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cgfmz. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.