IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ipewps/2202023.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

South Africa's response to the Covid-19 pandemic: The crisis in the context of the history of South African capitalism

Author

Listed:
  • Scully, Ben

Abstract

This paper is part of a comparative project on the Varieties of Covid-19 Reactions and Changing Modes of Globalization in the Global South. The project employs a comparative analysis of two industries-automobiles and clothing/textiles-across four countries in order to analyze the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on the structure of globalization. However, one of the premises of the project is that any such assessment must be historically contextualized. In order to understand how the world economy and each country was impacted, it is necessary to understand the context into which the pandemic arrived. This paper provides this background context for the country of South Africa. The South African case illustrates the importance of our historically contextual approach, as we argue that the main effect of the pandemic was that it accelerated economic and political trends which were ongoing before 2020. To summarize these trends, the pandemic crisis has opened up ideological and political space for South Africa to depart from neoliberal orthodoxy in ways that seemed unlikely before the pandemic. However it has simultaneously induced economic and fiscal constraints which have reinforced and even exacerbated the global imbalances of power which define neoliberal globalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Scully, Ben, 2023. "South Africa's response to the Covid-19 pandemic: The crisis in the context of the history of South African capitalism," IPE Working Papers 220/2023, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ipewps:2202023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/273557/1/1853566381.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniela Gabor, 2021. "The Wall Street Consensus," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 429-459, May.
    2. David Masondo, 2018. "South African business nanny state: the case of the automotive industrial policy post-apartheid, 1995–2010," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(156), pages 203-222, April.
    3. Ricardo Hausmann & Dani Rodrik & Charles F. Sabel, 2008. "Reconfiguring Industrial Policy: A Framework with an Application to South Africa," CID Working Papers 168, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    4. Fedderke, Johannes & Szalontai, Gábor, 2009. "Industry concentration in South African manufacturing industry: Trends and consequences, 1972-96," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 241-250, January.
    5. Bruno Amable & Stefano Palombarini, 2009. "A neorealist approach to institutional change and the diversity of capitalism," Post-Print hal-00345887, HAL.
    6. Roger Southall, 2007. "Ten Propositions about Black Economic Empowerment in South Africa," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(111), pages 67-84, March.
    7. Torkelson, Erin, 2020. "Collateral damages: Cash transfer and debt transfer in South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devlin, Robert & Moguillansky, Graciela, 2011. "Breeding Latin American tigers: operational principles for rehabilitating industrial policies," Copublicaciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2024 edited by Eclac.
    2. Johannes Fedderke & Nonso Obikili & Nicola Viegi, 2018. "Markups and Concentration in South African Manufacturing Sectors: An Analysis with Administrative Data," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 86(S1), pages 120-140, January.
    3. Minh T.N. Nguyen, 2021. "Portfolios of Social Protection, Labour Mobility and the Rise of Life Insurance in Rural Central Vietnam," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(2), pages 316-339, March.
    4. Brendan Whitty & Jessica Sklair & Paul Robert Gilbert & Emma Mawdsley & Jo‐Anna Russon & Olivia Taylor, 2023. "Outsourcing the Business of Development: The Rise of For‐profit Consultancies in the UK Aid Sector," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(4), pages 892-917, July.
    5. Johannes Fedderke & Yang Liu, 2018. "Inflation in South Africa: An Assessment of Alternative Inflation Models," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 86(2), pages 197-230, June.
    6. Labadi, Moufida & Nekhili, Mehdi, 2012. "Structure de propriété et partage de la valeur ajoutée : application aux entreprises françaises non financières du SBF120," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 12.
    7. Dimitar Anguelov, 2024. "State‐owned Enterprises and the Politics of Financializing Infrastructure Development in Indonesia: De‐risking at the Limit?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(3), pages 493-529, May.
    8. Yoann Verger, 2018. "First steps for a Sraffian ecological economics. An answer to Martins' “The Classical Circular Economy, Sraffian Ecological Economics and the Capabilities Approach”," Working Papers hal-01700228, HAL.
    9. Fedderke, Johannes W., 2018. "Exploring unbalanced growth: Understanding the sectoral structure of the South African economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 177-189.
    10. Höpner, Martin & Baccaro, Lucio, 2022. "Das deutsche Wachstumsmodell, 1991-2019," MPIfG Discussion Paper 22/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    11. Bruno Amable & Lilas Demmou & Ivan Ledezma, 2009. "The Lisbon strategy and structural reforms in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 15(1), pages 33-52, February.
    12. Sébastien Lechevalier & Pauline Debanes & Shin Wonkyu, 2016. "Financialization and industrial policies in Japan and Korea: Evolving complementarities and loss of institutional capabilities," Working Papers halshs-01431783, HAL.
    13. Valenzuela, Jose Maria, 2023. "State ownership in liberal economic governance? De-risking private investment in the electricity sector in Mexico," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    14. John Weiss, 2011. "Industrial Policy in the Twenty-First Century: Challenges for the Future," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-055, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Bruno Amable & Elvire Guillaud & Stefano Palombarini, 2011. "The political economy of neo-liberalism in Italy and France," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 11051, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    16. Sinclair, Lian & Coe, Neil M., 2024. "Critical mineral strategies in Australia: Industrial upgrading without environmental or social upgrading," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Webb, Christopher, 2021. "Giving everyone a fish: COVID-19 and the new politics of distribution," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110525, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Surbhi Gupta & Anil Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Evolution of infrastructure as an asset class: a systematic literature review and thematic analysis," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 173-200, May.
    19. Pietrobelli C. & Puppato F., 2015. "Technology foresight and industrial strategy in developing countries," MERIT Working Papers 2015-016, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    20. Robert Devlin & Carlo Pietrobelli, 2019. "Modern Industrial Policy and Public-Private Councils at the Subnational Level: Mexico’s Experience in an International Perspective," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 761-791.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Covid-19; South Africa; Industrial Policy; Social Policy; Neoliberalism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • L50 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - General
    • O55 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Africa
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ipewps:2202023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iphwrde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.