IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/cbr72_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to check a simulation study

Author

Listed:
  • White, Ian
  • Pham, Tra My
  • Quartagno, Matteo
  • Morris, Tim P

    (MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL)

Abstract

Simulation studies are a powerful tool in epidemiology and biostatistics, but they can be hard to conduct successfully. Sometimes unexpected results are obtained. We offer advice on how to check a simulation study when this occurs, and how to design and conduct the study to give results that are easier to check. Simulation studies should be designed to include some settings where answers are already known. They should be coded sequentially, with data generating mechanisms checked before simulated data are analysed. Results should be explored carefully, with scatterplots of standard error estimates against point estimates a powerful tool. Failed estimation and outlying estimates should be identified and avoided by changing data generating mechanisms or coding realistic hybrid analysis procedures. Finally, surprising results should be investigated by methods including considering whether sources of variation are correctly included. Following our advice may help to prevent errors and to improve the quality of published simulation studies.

Suggested Citation

  • White, Ian & Pham, Tra My & Quartagno, Matteo & Morris, Tim P, 2023. "How to check a simulation study," OSF Preprints cbr72_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cbr72_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/cbr72_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/63dcb8fd1e968603c2b270de/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/cbr72_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cbr72_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.