IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/2w4tc.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public perceptions of food’s biodiversity footprints

Author

Listed:
  • Stoeckli, Sabrina
  • Merian, Sybilla

    (University of Zurich)

  • Holenweger, Geraldine
  • Nielsen, Kristian Steensen
  • Natter, Martin

Abstract

Food is a major driver of the biodiversity crisis. Therefore, fostering biodiversity-friendly diets is essential for reducing biodiversity loss and restoring nature. However, how accurately the public perceives biodiversity impact of food is unknown. We conducted a preregistered quota-based study with 1,744 citizens from Switzerland to examine public perceptions of food-related biodiversity footprints. Only a minority recognizes how substantially food affects biodiversity. The food-related actions perceived as being the most impactful concern more local, organic, and less animal-based foods. Participants—especially those with high problem awareness—systematically overestimated Switzerland-specific biodiversity footprints. The magnitude of this pattern varies across foods, and only a few high-impact foods (e.g., cocoa, olive oil) are underestimated. We demonstrate that a simple educational intervention can alter perceptions of biodiversity footprints. Although we find no change in the general accuracy of footprint ratings, we observe an improvement in the ability to recognize high-impact foods.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoeckli, Sabrina & Merian, Sybilla & Holenweger, Geraldine & Nielsen, Kristian Steensen & Natter, Martin, 2024. "Public perceptions of food’s biodiversity footprints," OSF Preprints 2w4tc, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2w4tc
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2w4tc
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/667cf9f91c69c0023e274207/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/2w4tc?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Cimatti & Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer & Moreno Di Marco, 2023. "The role of high-biodiversity regions in preserving Nature’s Contributions to People," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1385-1393, November.
    2. Andy Purvis & Andy Hector, 2000. "Getting the measure of biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6783), pages 212-219, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stoeckli, Sabrina & Merian, Sybilla & Holenweger, Geraldine & Nielsen, Kristian Steensen & Natter, Martin, 2024. "Public perceptions of food’s biodiversity footprints," OSF Preprints 2w4tc_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. PK Gupta, 2018. "An Assessment of Relative Risks to Human/Ecological Health Biotech Crops versus Other Human Activities," Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research, Lupine Publishers, LLC, vol. 1(2), pages 51-62, February.
    3. Menezes, J. & Moura, B., 2022. "Pattern formation and coarsening dynamics in apparent competition models," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Stoeckli, Sabrina & Merian, Sybilla & Wanner, Silvan & Stucki, Matthias & Chaudhary, Abhishek, 2024. "Advancing Biodiversity Footprinting for Food-Related Behavior Change," OSF Preprints zpvq4, Center for Open Science.
    5. Pachepsky, Elizaveta & Bown, James L. & Eberst, Alistair & Bausenwein, Ursula & Millard, Peter & Squire, Geoff R. & Crawford, John W., 2007. "Consequences of intraspecific variation for the structure and function of ecological communities Part 2: Linking diversity and function," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 277-285.
    6. Winands, Sarah & Holm-Müller, Karin & Weikard, Hans-Peter, 2013. "The biodiversity conservation game with heterogeneous countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 14-23.
    7. Hopton, Matthew E. & Karunanithi, Arunprakash T. & Garmestani, Ahjond S. & White, Denis & Choate, Jerry R. & Cabezas, Heriberto, 2017. "A supplementary tool to existing approaches for assessing ecosystem community structure," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 355(C), pages 64-69.
    8. Jian Zhang & Michael S. Vogeley & Chaomei Chen, 2011. "Scientometrics of big science: a case study of research in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Tenorio, M. & Rangel, E. & Menezes, J., 2022. "Adaptive movement strategy in rock-paper-scissors models," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    10. repec:caa:jnljfs:v:preprint:id:20-2024-jfs is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Praveen, K.V. & Aditya, K.S. & Anbukkani, P. & Kumar, P. & Kar A., 2017. "Spatial Diversity in Indian Wheat and its Determinants," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 30(2).
    12. Menezes, J. & Barbalho, R., 2023. "How multiple weak species jeopardise biodiversity in spatial rock–paper–scissors models," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Meinard, Yves & Grill, Philippe, 2011. "The economic valuation of biodiversity as an abstract good," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1707-1714, August.
    14. Dehuan Li & Wei Sun & Fan Xia & Yixuan Yang & Yujing Xie, 2021. "Can Habitat Quality Index Measured Using the InVEST Model Explain Variations in Bird Diversity in an Urban Area?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    15. Vanessa Gabel & Robert Home & Sibylle Stöckli & Matthias Meier & Matthias Stolze & Ulrich Köpke, 2018. "Evaluating On-Farm Biodiversity: A Comparison of Assessment Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Wahyu Catur Adinugroho & Lilik Budi Prasetyo & Cecep Kusmana & Haruni Krisnawati & Christopher J. Weston & Liubov Volkova, 2022. "Recovery of Carbon and Vegetation Diversity 23 Years after Fire in a Tropical Dryland Forest of Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Ismael Rafols & Martin Meyer, 2010. "Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(2), pages 263-287, February.
    18. World Bank, 2013. "India : Diagnostic Assessment of Select Environmental Challenges, Volume 3. Valuation of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in India," World Bank Publications - Reports 16029, The World Bank Group.
    19. Bertram, Christine, 2010. "Integrating biodiversity indices into a multi-species optimal control model," Kiel Working Papers 1662, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    20. Campbell, Elliott T. & Tilley, David R., 2016. "Relationships between renewable emergy storage or flow and biodiversity: A modeling investigation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 134-148.
    21. Jeong, Dae-hyun & Cho, Keuntae & Park, Sangyong & Hong, Soon-ki, 2016. "Effects of knowledge diffusion on international joint research and science convergence: Multiple case studies in the fields of lithium-ion battery, fuel cell and wind power," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 15-27.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2w4tc. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.