IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/inarxi/dkw3e.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Review On: Company Strategic Competitive Power

Author

Listed:
  • Djaharuddin, Dharmawaty

Abstract

In an organization there is a purpose that terikikulasi as well as the mechanism set to achieve that goal. Effective organizations can create and maintain a viable market for their products. Conversely, ineffective organizations will fail in selfdetermination in the marketplace. Organizations must continually modify and improve mechanisms to achieve their objectives by reorganizing the role structure and relationships and their decision-making and control processes. Efficient organizations establish mechanisms that can support their market strategy, otherwise inefficient organizations will continue to experience difficulties in terms of their mechanisms and processes. Strategies can be identified on the basis of most elements of the organization's orientation to market product development. Miles and Sow's (1978) argue that there are four types of strategies (prospectors, defenders, analyzers, reactors) and their correlations, not processes used to formulate and implement strategies (Snow & Hambrick, 1980). Choosing the strategy used is not an easy thing for a company because it must see every change that occurs from within the environment and from other terms such as the type of product offered, the target market, competitors. Miles and Snow (1978) typology of generic strategies including prospectors, defenders, analyzers, and reactors. Prospectors focus on innovation, creating new markets and imposing uncertain environments (Miles and Snow, 1986). Defenders, emphasizing cost control in a stable environment, concentrate on their innovative efforts on process issues. analyzer builds a solid foundation in efficiency but continues to pursue incremental innovation through flexibility. reactors late to change often late and usually perform below the industry average (Brunk, 2003). This study aims to: (1) understand adaptive cyle of the organization to its environment, (2) to explain the alternative forms of adaptive behavioral strategic types, (3) to diagnose the relationship between the organization and its environment that utilizes the existing cycle, (4) to increase the attention or concern over the extent of the diagnosis organizational success and change the direction of the manager's theory of how people can and should manage, (5) create a conceptual basis for testing organizational change.

Suggested Citation

  • Djaharuddin, Dharmawaty, 2018. "Review On: Company Strategic Competitive Power," INA-Rxiv dkw3e, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:inarxi:dkw3e
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/dkw3e
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5b78fad195f24f0018eef3f1/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/dkw3e?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milé Terziovski, 2010. "Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource‐based view," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(8), pages 892-902, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mammassis, Constantinos S. & Kostopoulos, Konstantinos C., 2019. "CEO goal orientations, environmental dynamism and organizational ambidexterity: An investigation in SMEs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 577-588.
    2. Simona Alfiero & Laura Broccardo & Massimo Cane & Alfredo Esposito, 2018. "High Performance Through Innovation Process Management in SMEs. Evidence from the Italian wine sector," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 87-110.
    3. Nicolas Classen & Martin Carree & Anita Gils & Bettina Peters, 2014. "Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 595-609, March.
    4. Tan, Kim Hua & Zhan, YuanZhu & Ji, Guojun & Ye, Fei & Chang, Chingter, 2015. "Harvesting big data to enhance supply chain innovation capabilities: An analytic infrastructure based on deduction graph," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 223-233.
    5. Mennens, Kars & van Gils, Anita & Odekerken - Schröder, Gaby & Letterie, Wilko, 2016. "Exploring Antecedents of Service Innovation Excellence in Manufacturing SMEs," Research Memorandum 025, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    6. Stanley Ibeku, 2018. "Organisational Learning, Innovation And Performance Of Technology Start-Ups In Lagos, Nigeria," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-15, April.
    7. , Aisdl, 2020. "The Impact of Innovation on the Performance of Manufacturing Enterprises in Vietnam," OSF Preprints byjhc, Center for Open Science.
    8. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Boronat-Moll, Carles, 2012. "Process innovation objectives and management complementarities: patterns, drivers, co-adoption and performance effects," MERIT Working Papers 2012-051, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    9. Emilia JERCAN & Teodora NACU, 2023. "Digital transformation and innovation of the European SMEs. How Romania replies to the digitalization phenomena?," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special, ), pages 238-252.
    10. Luigi Mosca & Martina Gianecchini & Diego Campagnolo, 2021. "Organizational life cycle models: a design perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 10(1), pages 3-18, March.
    11. Eugenie Byukusenge & John C. Munene, 2017. "Knowledge management and business performance: Does innovation matter?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1368434-136, January.
    12. Graciela Corral de Zubielqui & Noel Lindsay & Wendy Lindsay & Janice Jones, 2019. "Knowledge quality, innovation and firm performance: a study of knowledge transfer in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 145-164, June.
    13. Asghar Afshar Jahanshahi & Khaled Nawaser & Alexander Brem, 2019. "The EFFECTS OF CUSTOMER CAPITAL ON CUSTOMER RESPONSE SPEED AND INNOVATIVENESS: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF MARKETING CAPABILITY," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-25, August.
    14. Pham Quang Huy & Vu Kien Phuc, 2023. "Big data in relation with business intelligence capabilities and e-commerce during COVID-19 pandemic in accountant’s perspective," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Francesco Chirico & Giuseppe Criaco & Massimo Baù & Lucia Naldi & Luis R. Gomez-Mejia & Josip Kotlar, 2020. "To patent or not to patent: That is the question. Intellectual property protection in family firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(2), pages 339-367, March.
    16. Luis Enrique Valdez Juarez & Elba Alicia Ramos Escobar & Gonzalo Maldonado Guzman, 2017. "The Effects of Absorptive Capacity, Intellectual Property and Innovation in SMEs," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 36-50, December.
    17. Zhong, Ray Y. & Huang, George Q. & Lan, Shulin & Dai, Q.Y. & Chen, Xu & Zhang, T., 2015. "A big data approach for logistics trajectory discovery from RFID-enabled production data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 260-272.
    18. Elena-Simona TACHE (BUZĂȚOIU), 2023. "Thinking for the future – Artificial Intelligence and the financial services," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special, ), pages 81-87.
    19. Veronika Bumberová & František Milichovský, 2019. "Sustainability Development of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Strategic Actions and Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Ivan Lapuente Garrido & Ronaldo Couto Parente & Cláudio Reis Gonçalo & Sílvio Luís de Vasconcellos, 2017. "Remaining Innovative: The Role of Past Performance, Absorptive Capacity, and Internationalization," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(6), pages 559-574, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:inarxi:dkw3e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ios.io/preprints/inarxiv/discover .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.