IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc139498.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modelling circular economy impacts in the context of a transition to a fair and sustainable economy. The need to combine bottom-up and top-down MFA, LCA and GE Models

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Existing forward-looking models such as Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), Energy models, and (Computable) General Equilibrium (GE) models work well for assessing energy and climate problems. But such top-down, usually economy-wide models have limited sector resolution. They cannot assess highly product specific circular economy (CE) strategies such as component re-use, refurbishment, or high quality material recycling. This requires detailed physical systems modelling. Material Flow Analysis (MFA) and Life cycle assessment/costing (LCA/LCC) offer this detail and physical basis. But these mainly physical, partial and static bottom-up models lack the economy-wide socio-economic impact assessment capabilities and endogenized dynamic features of e.g. GE models. We propose here a hybrid approach as solution. GE models with an Input Output (IO) core could be used as a basis, at a state of the art detail of 100-150 sectors/products and over150 countries, preferably backed by a (consortium of) international institutions to provide formal status. Higher detail, physical layers, and sectoral capital stock vintage information may be provided in a research context. Detailed bottom-up MFA and LCA/LCC assessments are then to be hard- or soft-linked to the IO core of the GE model. Even then questions remain as how CE interventions may induce changes in value added capturing in economic networks, stimulate diffusion of new technologies, and limit damages of environmental change on the economy. Additional qualitative and quantitative assessments can help to include such effects exogenously in a GE model. The fallacy of modelling the future based on historical trends can be overcome by using models in a back casting rather than forecasting mode. Models then are used to check under which conditions pathways to normatively desired futures can be realized. This approach allows assessing the social, economic and environmental impacts of CE policies comprehensively, and hence how CE can support the transition to a fair and sustainable economy.

Suggested Citation

  • TUKKER Arnold & RUEDA CANTUCHE Jose Manuel, 2024. "Modelling circular economy impacts in the context of a transition to a fair and sustainable economy. The need to combine bottom-up and top-down MFA, LCA and GE Models," JRC Research Reports JRC139498, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc139498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC139498
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent Moreau & Marlyne Sahakian & Pascal Griethuysen & François Vuille, 2017. "Coming Full Circle: Why Social and Institutional Dimensions Matter for the Circular Economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 497-506, June.
    2. Stefano Merciai & Jannick Schmidt, 2018. "Methodology for the Construction of Global Multi†Regional Hybrid Supply and Use Tables for the EXIOBASE v3 Database," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(3), pages 516-531, June.
    3. Richard Wood & Troy R. Hawkins & Edgar G. Hertwich & Arnold Tukker, 2014. "Harmonising National Input-Output Tables For Consumption-Based Accounting - Experiences From Exiopol," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 387-409, December.
    4. Tukker, Arnold & Goldbohm, R. Alexandra & de Koning, Arjan & Verheijden, Marieke & Kleijn, René & Wolf, Oliver & Pérez-Domínguez, Ignacio & Rueda-Cantuche, Jose M., 2011. "Environmental impacts of changes to healthier diets in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1776-1788, August.
    5. Christian Lutz & Bernd Meyer & Marc Ingo Wolter, 2010. "The global multisector/multicountry 3-E model GINFORS. A description of the model and a baseline forecast for global energy demand and CO 2 emissions," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1/2), pages 25-45.
    6. Carl†Johan Södersten & Richard Wood & Edgar G. Hertwich, 2018. "Environmental Impacts of Capital Formation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(1), pages 55-67, February.
    7. Sun, Zhongxiao & Behrens, Paul & Tukker, Arnold & Bruckner, Martin & Scherer, Laura, 2022. "Shared and environmentally just responsibility for global biodiversity loss," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arru, Brunella & Furesi, Roberto & Pulina, Pietro & Sau, Paola & Madau, Fabio A., 2022. "The Circular Economy in the Agri-food system: A Performance Measurement of European Countries," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 24(2), September.
    2. Bernhard Steubing & Arjan de Koning & Stefano Merciai & Arnold Tukker, 2022. "How do carbon footprints from LCA and EEIOA databases compare? A comparison of ecoinvent and EXIOBASE," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1406-1422, August.
    3. Jingwen Huo & Peipei Chen & Klaus Hubacek & Heran Zheng & Jing Meng & Dabo Guan, 2022. "Full‐scale, near real‐time multi‐regional input–output table for the global emerging economies (EMERGING)," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1218-1232, August.
    4. Glenn A. Aguilar‐Hernandez & Sebastiaan Deetman & Stefano Merciai & João F. D. Rodrigues & Arnold Tukker, 2021. "Global distribution of material inflows to in‐use stocks in 2011 and its implications for a circularity transition," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1447-1461, December.
    5. Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Pietro Pulina & Paola Sau & Fabio A. Madau, 2022. "The Circular Economy in the Agri-food system: A Performance Measurement of European Countries," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 24(2), pages 1-35.
    6. Daniel Moran & Richard Wood, 2014. "Convergence Between The Eora, Wiod, Exiobase, And Openeu'S Consumption-Based Carbon Accounts," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 245-261, September.
    7. Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles & Janaina Mascarenhas & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & Adriana Hoffman Trevisan, 2022. "Smoothing the circular economy transition: The role of resources and capabilities enablers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1814-1837, May.
    8. Monia Niero & Charlotte L. Jensen & Chiara Farné Fratini & Jens Dorland & Michael S. Jørgensen & Susse Georg, 2021. "Is life cycle assessment enough to address unintended side effects from Circular Economy initiatives?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1111-1120, October.
    9. Francesco Bandarin & Enrico Ciciotti & Marco Cremaschi & Giovanna Madera & Paolo Perulli & Diana Shendrikova, 2020. "Which Future for Cities after COVID-19 An international Survey," Reports, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, October.
    10. Millar, Neal & McLaughlin, Eoin & Börger, Tobias, 2019. "The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 11-19.
    11. Patrick Gruning & Zeynep Kantur, 2024. "Financial Intermediation and Climate Change in a Production and Investment Network Model for the Euro Area," Working Papers 2024/06, Latvijas Banka.
    12. Arnold Tukker & Renzo Akkerman & Antoine Heideveld & Jaco Quist & Ruben Vrijhoef & Cees Withagen & Mark Beumer, 2024. "Distribution of Power and Value Crucial for a Successful Circular Economy Transition," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 2413-2425, December.
    13. Morena Bruno & Marianne Thomsen & Federico Maria Pulselli & Nicoletta Patrizi & Michele Marini & Dario Caro, 2019. "The carbon footprint of Danish diets," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 489-507, October.
    14. Akan, Taner & Gündüz, Halil İbrahim & Emirmahmutoğlu, Furkan & Işık, Ali Haydar, 2023. "Disaggregating renewable energy-growth nexus: W-ARDL and W-Toda-Yamamoto approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Wiebe, Kirsten S. & Lutz, Christian, 2016. "Endogenous technological change and the policy mix in renewable power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 739-751.
    16. Cynthia Yip & Glenis Crane & Jonathan Karnon, 2013. "Systematic review of reducing population meat consumption to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and obtain health benefits: effectiveness and models assessments," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(5), pages 683-693, October.
    17. Dühr, Stefanie & Berry, Stephen & Moore, Trivess, 2023. "Sustainable housing at a neighbourhood scale," SocArXiv wdfhs, Center for Open Science.
    18. Bonnet, Céline & Bouamra-Mechemache, Zohra & Réquillart, Vincent & Treich, Nicolas, 2020. "Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    19. Anna Barford & Saffy Rose Ahmad, 2021. "A Call for a Socially Restorative Circular Economy: Waste Pickers in the Recycled Plastics Supply Chain," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 761-782, September.
    20. Gavin Melles, 2021. "Figuring the Transition from Circular Economy to Circular Society in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc139498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.