IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/img/wpaper/67.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is users rating becoming overpowering? The risks of inappropriate use of digital feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Daniele Archibugi

    (National Research Council, Irpps, and University of London, Birkbeck College, School of Business, Economics and Informatics)

  • Natalia Tosoni

    (University of Bologna Alma Mater, Department of Sociology and Business Law)

Abstract

Digital technologies have made it easy to generate and disseminate feedback on the performance of products and services. This technological advance has contributed significantly to reducing the information asymmetries between producers and consumers, between suppliers of public goods and users, and between politicians and citizens. It would seem that Web 2.0 has enhanced the effectiveness of the "voice" evoked by Albert Hirschman in the 1970s. However, is there a risk that the feedback provided and the connected numerical evaluation, the so-called rating, may become too invasive, so much as to constitute a concrete threat to the confidentiality of individual data? We propose to distinguish between three types of feedback: 1) bottom-up feedback, which occurs when many individuals evaluate and comment on the performance of economic and political organizations; 2) the transversal one, which happens when a series of individuals, in the same hierarchical position, exchange comments, appreciations and reciprocal evaluations; 3) the top-down one, which arises when organizations assign a rating to individuals. Based on our analysis, we also offer some suggestions to moderate the already existing risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniele Archibugi & Natalia Tosoni, 2023. "Is users rating becoming overpowering? The risks of inappropriate use of digital feedback," Working Papers 67, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised 12 Aug 2023.
    • Handle: RePEc:img:wpaper:67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/52614/1/52614.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Chuncheng, 2019. "Multiple social credit systems in China," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 21(1), pages 22-32.
    2. Andreasen, Alan R, 1985. "Consumer Responses to Dissatisfaction in Loose Monopolies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(2), pages 135-141, September.
    3. Liu, Chuncheng, 2019. "Multiple Social Credit Systems in China," SocArXiv v9frs, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stahl, B.C. & Andreou, A. & Brey, P. & Hatzakis, T. & Kirichenko, A. & Macnish, K. & Laulhé Shaelou, S. & Patel, A. & Ryan, M. & Wright, D., 2021. "Artificial intelligence for human flourishing – Beyond principles for machine learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 374-388.
    2. Abbas Ali Chandio & Fayyaz Ahmad & Ghulam Raza Sargani & Asad Amin & Martinson Ankrah Twumasi, 2022. "Analyzing the effective role of formal credit and technological development for rice cultivation," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 683-711, June.
    3. Sheng Zou, 2021. "Disenchanting Trust: Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Governance, and China’s Emerging Social Credit System," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 140-149.
    4. Babin, Barry J. & Griffin, Mitch, 1998. "The nature of satisfaction: An updated examination and analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 127-136, February.
    5. Liu, Chuncheng, 2019. "Multiple social credit systems in China," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 21(1), pages 22-32.
    6. Mark Ojeme & Ogechi Adeola, 2023. "The relationship between business and bank: the role of perceived injustice in complaint behaviour," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 396-409, June.
    7. Sonia Dickinson‐Delaporte & Kathleen Mortimer & Gayle Kerr & David S Waller & Alice Kendrick, 2020. "Power and responsibility: Advertising self‐regulation and consumer protection in a digital world," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 675-700, June.
    8. Garín-Muñoz, Teresa & Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio & Gijón, Covadonga & López, Rafael, 2016. "Consumer complaint behaviour in telecommunications: The case of mobile phone users in Spain," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 804-820.
    9. Marta Dapena-Baron & Thomas W. Gruen & Lin Guo, 2020. "Heart, head, and hand: a tripartite conceptualization, operationalization, and examination of brand loyalty," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(3), pages 355-375, May.
    10. Gil Luria & Asaf Levanon & Dana Yagil & Iddo Gal, 2016. "Status, National Culture and Customers’ Propensity to Complain," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 309-330, March.
    11. Armstrong, J Scott, 1991. "Prediction of Consumer Behavior by Experts and Novices," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 251-256, September.
    12. Rezaei, Sajad, 2015. "Segmenting consumer decision-making styles (CDMS) toward marketing practice: A partial least squares (PLS) path modeling approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 1-15.
    13. Liu, Chuncheng, 2019. "Multiple Social Credit Systems in China," SocArXiv v9frs, Center for Open Science.
    14. Gurdon, Michael A. & Savitt, Ronald & Pribova, Marie, 1999. "Consumer activism in the Czech Republic: the role of exit and voice in a changing economy," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 3-19.
    15. T. Randolph Beard & Jeffrey T. Macher & John W. Mayo, 2015. "'Can you Hear Me Now?' Exit, Voice and Loyalty Under Increasing Competition," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(3).
    16. Singh, Jagdip & Cuttler, Leona & Silvers, J. B., 2004. "Toward understanding consumers' role in medical decisions for emerging treatments: Issues, framework and hypotheses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(9), pages 1054-1065, September.
    17. Sands, Sean & Campbell, Colin & Shedd, Lois & Ferraro, Carla & Mavrommatis, Alexis, 2020. "How small service failures drive customer defection: Introducing the concept of microfailures," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 573-584.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:img:wpaper:67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Helen Lawton Smith (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dmbbkuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.