IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/12821.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Elements of task definition shopping situations: A study in context of products high on haptic salience

Author

Listed:
  • Abhishek
  • Sinha, Piyush Kumar

Abstract

Marketing literature has identified task definitions as one of the important situational influences. Task definition features of a situation include an intent or requirement to select, shop for, or obtain information about a general or specific purchase. Researchers have tried to define planned and emergency shopping situations on basis of amount spent on trip and by customer-generated measures on the purpose of the shopping trip. In the studies using behavioral data, either an individual cut-off or an aggregate cut-off has been used. All these definitions of planned and emergency shopping situations are driven from practitioners’ perspective and suffer from operationalization issues. This brings to fore a need to enhance the understanding about the concept of task definition. In this study, we make an attempt to understand and define the concept of task definition from customers’ perspective. Based on the thematic analysis of data collected through qualitative interviews, we identify the elements of task definitions which customers consider salient in distinguishing between different task definitions. We conclude, based on the additional analysis of comparison of these elements across different product categories, that it is also important to consider the finer point in elements across two product categories for same type of shopping trip.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhishek & Sinha, Piyush Kumar, 2014. "Elements of task definition shopping situations: A study in context of products high on haptic salience," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-03-09, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:12821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/20167107752014-03-09.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walters, Rockney G. & Jamil, Maqbul, 2003. "Exploring the relationships between shopping trip type, purchases of products on promotion, and shopping basket profit," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 17-29, January.
    2. David R. Bell & James M. Lattin, 1998. "Shopping Behavior and Consumer Preference for Store Price Format: Why “Large Basket” Shoppers Prefer EDLP," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 66-88.
    3. Belk, Russell W, 1975. "Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(3), pages 157-164, December.
    4. Holbrook, Morris B. & Gardner, Meryl P., 1998. "How Motivation Moderates the Effects of Emotions on the Duration of Consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 241-252, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sutthipong Meeyai, 2015. "Modeling Store Patronage: A Systematic Review," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 40-48, July.
    2. Veysel Yilmaz & Cengiz Aktas & H.Eray Celik, 2007. "Development of a Scale forMeasuring Consumer Behaviorin Store Choice," Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, Anadolu University, vol. 7(1), pages 171-184, December.
    3. Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Uniyal, Dwarika Prasad, 2016. "Impact of Store format on Shopping Involvement," IIMA Working Papers WP2016-06-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    4. Ivan-Damir Anić & Sonja Radas, 2016. "Boundaries for the Retail Geographical Market and Factors Influencing Shoppers' Mobility," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 315-341, July.
    5. Abhishek,, 2016. "Do time constraint and emergency purchase situation exert same influence on shopping? A study under haptic touch influence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 242-251.
    6. Sarantopoulos, Panagiotis & Theotokis, Aristeidis & Pramatari, Katerina & Doukidis, Georgios, 2016. "Shopping missions: An analytical method for the identification of shopper need states," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1043-1052.
    7. Anastasia Griva & Cleopatra Bardaki & Katerina Pramatari & Georgios Doukidis, 2022. "Factors Affecting Customer Analytics: Evidence from Three Retail Cases," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 493-516, April.
    8. David R. Bell & Jeongwen Chiang & V. Padmanabhan, 1999. "The Decomposition of Promotional Response: An Empirical Generalization," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 504-526.
    9. Marie-Eve Laporte & Géraldine Michel & Sophie Rieunier, 2017. "Towards a better understanding of eating behaviour through the concept of Perception of Nutritional Risk," Post-Print halshs-02923251, HAL.
    10. Elena Kossmann & Mónica Gómez-Suárez, 2018. "Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, September.
    11. Volpe, Richard J., III, 2011. "Evaluating the Performance of U.S. Supermarkets: Pricing Strategies, Competition from Hypermarkets, and Private Labels," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Toma Andrei, 2021. "Strategies Used By Retailers To Influence Buyers," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 43-48, December.
    13. Teunter, L.H. & Teunter, R.H., 2004. "Profitability of price promotions if stockpilling increases consumption," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2004-10, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    14. Calderwood, Eric & Freathy, Paul, 2014. "Consumer mobility in the Scottish isles: The impact of internet adoption upon retail travel patterns," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 192-203.
    15. Ray, Sourav & Snir, Avichai & Levy, Daniel, 2023. "Retail Pricing Format and Rigidity of Regular Prices," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-1.
    16. Noble, Stephanie M. & Lee, Kang Bok & Zaretzki, Russell & Autry, Chad, 2017. "Coupon clipping by impoverished consumers: Linking demographics, basket size, and coupon redemption rates," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 553-571.
    17. K. Sudhir, 2001. "Structural Analysis of Manufacturer Pricing in the Presence of a Strategic Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 244-264, October.
    18. LEMOINE, Jean-François & PLICHON, Véronique, 2000. "Le rôle des facteurs situationnels dans l'explication des réactions affectives du consommateur à l'intérieur d'un point de vente. / The Role of Situational Factors in the Understanding of Consumer Aff," LEG - CERMAB / Centre de Recherche en Marketing de Bourgogne - Cahier de recherche 2000-04, LEG - CERMAB, CNRS UMR 5118, Université de Bourgogne.
    19. DeSarbo, Wayne S. & Selin Atalay, A. & Blanchard, Simon J., 2009. "A three-way clusterwise multidimensional unfolding procedure for the spatial representation of context dependent preferences," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3217-3230, June.
    20. Sha Zhang & Xiting Wu & Yonggui Wang & Peiqi Jiang, 2024. "Does time of day affect consumers’ price sensitivity?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:12821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.