IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-02302135.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Markovian model for granting credit in microfinance
[Modèle markovien d'octroi de crédit en microfinance]

Author

Listed:
  • Philibert Andriamanantena

    (Université de Fianarantsoa)

  • Issouf Abdou

    (Université des Comores)

Abstract

Starting from the generalized model of Osman Khodr and Francine Diener [3], we present a model that meets the expectations of the microfinance institution (MFI) and that of borrowers and that incorporates all the characteristics of poor populations, know the tolerance in case of partial default and the possibility of having a progressive loan automatically. It is a learning model that will offer microfinance institutions a decision support tool more suited to their reality. It is based on a Markov chain which includes several states associated with the economic situation of the borrower including three types of beneficiaries: B_1 is the state of being beneficiary at initial time t = 1, B_2 is the state of being beneficiary at time t = 2, and I is the state of financial inclusion which means permanent beneficiary, A^1 the state of applicant and A^T … A^2 represent (T - 1) states of exclusion. We have modeled the behavior of a borrower by a parameter λ which depends on the probability α of success of the borrower. At the initial moment, λ= (1+α)/(1-α), this quantity changes as soon as the borrower passes from one state to another with a probability of success different from α. The agency's decision to grant credit depends entirely on the parameter λ which is compared to the set subjective threshold values. The chance γ of having a loan (γ: probability of requesting credit granted) for a borrower depends on the parameter γ, with γ=1-1/λ, λ≠0. keywords: Microfinance, Credit Grant Decision, Markov Chain, Individual Loan, Dynamic Incentive, Updated Expected Profit

Suggested Citation

  • Philibert Andriamanantena & Issouf Abdou, 2020. "Markovian model for granting credit in microfinance [Modèle markovien d'octroi de crédit en microfinance]," Working Papers hal-02302135, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02302135
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02302135v3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02302135v3/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Green, Edward J & Porter, Robert H, 1984. "Noncooperative Collusion under Imperfect Price Information," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(1), pages 87-100, January.
    2. Suman Ghosh & Eric Van Tassel, 2007. "Microfinance, Subsidies and Dynamic Incentives," Working Papers 07001, Department of Economics, College of Business, Florida Atlantic University.
    3. Alexander Tedeschi, Gwendolyn, 2006. "Here today, gone tomorrow: Can dynamic incentives make microfinance more flexible?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 84-105, June.
    4. Beatriz Armendáriz de Aghion & Jonathan Morduch, 2000. "Microfinance Beyond Group Lending," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 8(2), pages 401-420, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drugov, Mikhail & Macchiavello, Rocco, 2008. "Learning and Microlending," CEPR Discussion Papers 7011, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Xavier Giné & Pamela Jakiela & Dean Karlan & Jonathan Morduch, 2010. "Microfinance Games," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(3), pages 60-95, July.
    3. Emilios Galariotis & Christophe Villa & Nurmukhammad Yusupov, 2011. "Recent Advances in Lending to the Poor with Asymmetric Information," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 1371-1390, July.
    4. Bruno, Olivier & Khachatryan, Knar, 2020. "Compulsory versus voluntary savings as an incentive mechanism in microfinance programs," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    5. Federica Calidoni & Alessandro Fedele, 2009. "Profit‐maximizing behaviour replaces social sanctions in urban microcredit markets The case of Italian MAGs1," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 17(2), pages 329-349, April.
    6. Ulf Römer & Oliver Mußhoff & Ron Weber & Calum Turvey, 2017. "Wie ehrlich sind Kunden von Mikrofinanzinstituten? Ein Bogus-Pipeline-Experiment zur Untersuchung asymmetrischer Information im Mikrofinanzsektor auf den Philippinen [How Honest are Clients of Micr," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 153-172, June.
    7. Juan‐Pablo Montero & Juan Ignacio Guzman, 2010. "Output‐Expanding Collusion In The Presence Of A Competitive Fringe," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 106-126, March.
    8. Janvier D. Nkurunziza, 2005. "Reputation and Credit without Collateral in Africa`s Formal Banking," Economics Series Working Papers WPS/2005-02, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    9. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    10. Sylvain Chassang, 2010. "Building Routines: Learning, Cooperation, and the Dynamics of Incomplete Relational Contracts," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 448-465, March.
    11. Germán Coloma, 2002. "Un Modelo Integrado de Depredación y Colusión," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 39(116), pages 123-133.
    12. Lippert, Steffen & Spagnolo, Giancarlo, 2008. "Internet peering as a network of relations," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 33-49, February.
    13. Römer, Ulf & Weber, Ron & Mußhoff, Oliver & Turvey, Calcum G., 2017. "Truth and consequences: Bogus pipeline experiment in informal small business lending," DARE Discussion Papers 1702, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    14. Abito, Jose Miguel & Chen, Cuicui, 2023. "A partial identification framework for dynamic games," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Jozef Konings & Patrick Van Cayseele & Frédéric Warzynski, 2010. "The Implementation of National Competition Policy Law and the Dynamics of Price–Cost Margins: Evidence from Belgium and the Netherlands 1993–1999," Chapters, in: Jean-Luc Gaffard & Evens Salies (ed.), Innovation, Economic Growth and the Firm, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Joseph E. Harrington, Jr., 2004. "Cartel Pricing Dynamics in the Presence of an Antitrust Authority," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 35(4), pages 651-673, Winter.
    17. Nicolas Vieille, 2010. "Recursive Methods in Discounted Stochastic Games: An Algorithm for - 1 and a Folk Theorem," Post-Print hal-00543616, HAL.
    18. Inkoo Cho & Noah Williams, 2024. "Collusive Outcomes Without Collusion," Papers 2403.07177, arXiv.org.
    19. Ulf Römer & Oliver Musshoff, 2017. "Can agricultural credit scoring for microfinance institutions be implemented and improved by weather data?," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 78(1), pages 83-97, December.
    20. Pak Hung Au & Yuk‐Fai Fong & Jin Li, 2020. "Negotiated Block Trade And Rebuilding Of Trust," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 61(2), pages 901-939, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    microfinance; credit grant decision; markov chain; individual loan; dynamic incentive; updated expected profit;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02302135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.