IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03727581.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards a new prudential regulation scheme: a contribution to the debate
[Vers un nouveau schéma de réglementation prudentielle : une contribution au débat]

Author

Listed:
  • Jézabel Couppey

    (TEAM - Théories et Applications en Microéconomie et Macroéconomie - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The financial and banking instability of recent years gave rise to a debate concerning the appropriateness of a prudential regulation reform. This article contributes to this debate by proposing a new scheme of prudential regulation that presents three fundamental characteristics to improve the regulation efficiency. First, this scheme can be defined as a "regulatory triptych" integrating the three modes of regulation operating in the financial and banking sphere: regulation, internal control and market discipline. Second, it is "dynamic and incentive compatible" in the sense that it takes into account, period by period, of the possible reactions the agents (regulated and regulating) and implements instruments to insure the compatibility of agents incentives. Third, it is "global" (and not based on the institution) because its application concerns all regulated financial intermediaires (banks, investment entreprises and insurance companies). Indeed, the institutional nature of prudential systems seems us to be one of essential causes of their inefficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Jézabel Couppey, 2000. "Towards a new prudential regulation scheme: a contribution to the debate [Vers un nouveau schéma de réglementation prudentielle : une contribution au débat]," Post-Print halshs-03727581, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03727581
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03727581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03727581/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George J. Benston, 1993. "Market discipline: the role of uninsured depositors and other market participants," Conference Series ; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, vol. 37, pages 65-95.
    2. Dana Jr. James D., 1993. "The Organization and Scope of Agents: Regulating Multiproduct Industries," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 288-310, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jézabel Couppey, 2000. "Towards a new prudential regulation scheme: a contribution to the debate [Vers un nouveau schéma de réglementation prudentielle : une contribution au débat]," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03727581, HAL.
    2. Jezabel Couppey, 2000. "Vers un nouveau schéma de réglementation prudentielle : une contribution au débat," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 56(1), pages 37-56.
    3. Jézabel Couppey, 2000. "Vers un nouveau schéma de réglementation prudentielle : une contribution au débat," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques bla00006, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    4. Patrick W. Schmitz, 2005. "Allocating Control in Agency Problems with Limited Liability and Sequential Hidden Actions," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(2), pages 318-336, Summer.
    5. Litterscheid, Sina & Szalay, Dezsö, 2014. "Sequential, multidimensional screening," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100621, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Martimort, David & Semenov, Aggey, 2008. "The informational effects of competition and collusion in legislative politics," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 1541-1563, July.
    7. Fang,H. & Norman,P., 2003. "An efficiency rationale for bundling of public goods," Working papers 19, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    8. Schmitz, Patrick W., 2013. "Job design with conflicting tasks reconsidered," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 108-117.
    9. Hanming Fang & Peter Norman, 2010. "Optimal Provision of Multiple Excludable Public Goods," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(4), pages 1-37, November.
    10. Huric Larsen, J.F., 2012. "Public firm incentives under asymmetric information and prospect of deregulation and privatization," MPRA Paper 39351, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Maximilian J.B. Hall, 2001. "The basle Committee's proposals for a new capital adequacy assessment framework: a critique," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 54(217), pages 111-179.
    12. Hoppe, Eva I. & Kusterer, David J., 2011. "Conflicting tasks and moral hazard: Theory and experimental evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(8), pages 1094-1108.
    13. Azar, Ofer H., 2010. "Can more consumers lead to lower profits? A model of multi-product competition," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 184-195, November.
    14. Tooraj Jamasb and Manuel Llorca, 2019. "Energy Systems Integration: Economics of a New Paradigm," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    15. Tangerås, Thomas P., 2012. "Optimal transmission regulation of an integrated energy market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1644-1655.
    16. Fahad Khalil & Doyoung Kim & Dongsoo Shin, 2006. "Optimal Task Design: To Integrate or Separate Planning and Implementation?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 457-478, June.
    17. Brighi, Luigi & D'Amato, Marcello, 2002. "Two-dimensional screening: a case of monopoly regulation," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 251-264, September.
    18. Craig Brett, 2007. "Optimal nonlinear taxes for families," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 14(3), pages 225-261, June.
    19. Pau Olivella & Fred Schroyen, 2014. "Multidimensional Screening in a Monopolistic Insurance Market," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 39(1), pages 90-130, March.
    20. Joachim Bertsch & Simeon Hagspiel, 2018. "Regulation of non-marketed outputs and substitutable inputs," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 174-205, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03727581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.