IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03264202.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Spin-off firms, labour market institutions and entrepreneurial actors

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Lanciano-Morandat

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Hiroatsu Nohara

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Among these "bridging institutions", start-up firms have recently been attracting particular attention. Indeed, in a number of European countries, universities, national research institutions and even R&D-based multinational companies are being encouraged to establish "incubators", in order to boost start-up firms with a high technological potential. This is the most direct way in which the scientific "community" – universities and public research organisations notably - can transfer its knowledge and competence to industry. They are, therefore, putting in place a range of support or incentive policies (business plan consulting, IP management, funding aids, marketing etc.), to bridge the huge gap separating academia from commercial activities. Along with such institutional arrangements, administrative measures concerning the personnel status of (public-sector) researchers (paid leave to run an incubator, possibility of return to prior position after launching start-up, compatibility of academic status with private ownership etc.) are also being taken. In particular, many authors have for a long time been investigating the two main issues that concern start-up firms, namely intellectual property rights and the search for venture capital. Although these issues are important from the public policy perspective, relatively few studies have been done from the viewpoint of the construction of entrepreneurial competence. After all, it seems very important to extend our knowledge of the links between involvement in the launch of a start-up and academic career paths and to ascertain what significance such an event might have for the career development of scientists and engineers. In other words, we could consider the process of setting up spin-off firms with high technological potential as part of the actors' professional trajectories and, at the same time, as part of on ongoing process of competence construction. This type of competence analysis combined with studies of professional trajectories could well complement more general analyses of spin-offs. Thus the purpose of this paper is to present, however tentatively, a typological framework that seeks to classify spin-offs in terms of "competence trajectories". To this end, we draw on the labour market literature on highly skilled scientific and technical experts (academics, scientists and engineers) and combine it with the institutional setting (environment) of start-ups. In this domain, complex interactions between the "scientific community", innovation policy agencies and firms play a crucial role in shaping different "incentive mechanisms for the creation of spin-offs" and determining the structure of the "intermediate labour market". It is one of the reasons why we need both to combine labour market analysis with the general dynamics of innovation and to locate it within the overall context of the institutional configuration of R&D.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Lanciano-Morandat & Hiroatsu Nohara, 2005. "Spin-off firms, labour market institutions and entrepreneurial actors," Post-Print halshs-03264202, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03264202
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03264202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03264202/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Casper & Mark Lehrer & David Soskice, 1999. "Can High-technology Industries Prosper in Germany? Institutional Frameworks and the Evolution of the German Software and Biotechnology Industries," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 5-24.
    2. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6665 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Jean-Luc Gaffard, 1989. "Marchés et organisation dans les stratégies technologiques des firmes industrielles," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 48(1), pages 35-51.
    4. Christian Longhi, 1999. "Networks, Collective Learning and Technology Development in Innovative High Technology Regions: The Case of Sophia-Antipolis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 333-342.
    5. Hiroatsu Nohara & Eric Verdier, 2001. "Sources Of Resilience In The Computer And Software Industries In France," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 201-220.
    6. Caroline Lanciano-morandat & Hiroatsu Nohara, 2003. "The New Production of Young Scientists (PhDs) A Labour Market Analysis in International Perspective," DRUID Working Papers 03-04, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    7. Caroline Lanciano-Morandat & Hiroatsu Nohara & Eric Verdier, 2006. "Higher Education Systems and Industrial Innovation," Post-Print halshs-00391812, HAL.
    8. Hiroatsu Nohara & Eric Verdier, 2001. "Sources Of Resilience In The Computer And Software Industries In France," Post-Print halshs-00484829, HAL.
    9. Caroline Lanciano-Morandatt & Hiroatsu Nohara, 2003. "Les essaimages académiques dans le secteur de l'informatique en France : Effets institutionnels, effets de territoire ou construction des acteurs locaux ?," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(2), pages 235-265.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hiroatsu Nohara, 2003. "Synergy Between Science/Technology and Local Development: Some Experience in France," Post-Print halshs-02925831, HAL.
    2. Elitsa R. Banalieva & Ravi Sarathy, 2011. "A Contingency Theory of Internationalization," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 593-634, October.
    3. Mario Benassi & Matteo Landoni, 2019. "State-owned enterprises as knowledge-explorer agents," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 218-241, February.
    4. Mete Basar Baypinar, 2016. "Evolution of ICT and software industry: Crisis, resilience and the role of emerging clusters," ERSA conference papers ersa16p232, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Caroline Lanciano-Morandat & Hiroatsu Nohara, 2009. "Professionals, Production Systems and Innovation Capacities in The Software Industry: A comparison between France and Japan," Post-Print halshs-00485076, HAL.
    6. Hung, Shih-Chang & Whittington, Richard, 2011. "Agency in national innovation systems: Institutional entrepreneurship and the professionalization of Taiwanese IT," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 526-538, May.
    7. Casper, Steven & Whitley, Richard, 2004. "Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 89-106, January.
    8. Max-Peter Menzel, 2010. "Sources of ‘Second Generation Growth’: Spin-off Processes in the Emerging Biochip Industries in Jena and Berlin," Chapters, in: Dirk Fornahl & Sebastian Henn & Max-Peter Menzel (ed.), Emerging Clusters, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Rani J Dang & Karine Roux & Christian Longhi & Damien Talbot & Catherine Thomas, 2014. "Territorial Innovation Dynamics: A Knowledge Based Perspective," Post-Print hal-02385361, HAL.
    10. Klaus Brockhoff, 2006. "Technologischer Wandel und Corporate Governance," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(54), pages 7-31, January.
    11. Anna Lejpras & Andreas Stephan, 2011. "Locational conditions, cooperation, and innovativeness: evidence from research and company spin-offs," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(3), pages 543-575, June.
    12. Hancké, Bob & Coulter, Steve, 2013. "The German manufacturing sector unpacked: institutions, policies and future trajectories," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56090, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Christian Longhi, 2017. "Cluster Dynamics: Learning from Competitiveness Cluster Policy. The Case of 'Secure Communicating Solutions' in the French Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region," GREDEG Working Papers 2017-42, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    14. Liao, Tung-Shan & Rice, John, 2010. "Innovation investments, market engagement and financial performance: A study among Australian manufacturing SMEs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 117-125, February.
    15. Mark Lehrer, 2007. "Organizing knowledge spillovers when basic and applied research are interdependent: German biotechnology policy in historical perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 277-296, June.
    16. Ben Letaifa, Soumaya & Rabeau, Yves, 2013. "Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2071-2078.
    17. Raphael Suire & Jérome Vicente, 2009. "Why do some places succeed when others decline? A social interaction model of cluster viability," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 381-404, May.
    18. Isaak, Robert, 2009. "From collective learning to Silicon Valley replication: The limits to synergistic entrepreneurship in Sophia Antipolis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 134-143, June.
    19. Scarpetta, Stefano & Tressel, Thierry, 2004. "Boosting productivity via innovation and adoption of new technologies : any role for labor market institutions?," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 29144, The World Bank.
    20. Jaan Masso & Raul Eamets & Jaanika Meriküll & Hanna Kanep, 2009. "Support for Evolution in the Knowledge-Based Economy:Demand for PhDs in Estonia," Baltic Journal of Economics, Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies, vol. 9(1), pages 5-30, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03264202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.