IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02903500.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to lead a sustainability transition at the company level? An approach based on management tools performativity
[Comment mener une transition soutenable au niveau de l'entreprise ? Une approche basée sur la performativité des outils de gestion]

Author

Listed:
  • Nabila Iken

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Franck Aggeri

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Stéphane Morel

    (Technocentre Renault [Guyancourt] - RENAULT)

Abstract

Research on sustainability transitions has generally focused on socio-technical systems, but less on organizations and firms. However, the decisions of actors within companies are based on performance indicators, roadmaps, dashboards, etc., all sorts of management tools that embody their decision-making routines and contribute to maintaining the regimes in place. Our research links the literature on sustainability transitions with that of management instrument approaches in management science, by analyzing the conditions under which management instruments can contribute to impulse a sustainability transition at a company level. We use the concept of performativity to describe the ability of these artifacts to change the reality they point to. Indeed, through the design of a simplified LCA tool and an internal carbon pricing tool within a car manufacturer in the frame of a research-intervention, we have found that these conditions require the construction of the tools legitimacy with their users, but also the mobilization of windows of opportunity in a storytelling and sensemaking process. Finally, we propose a typical organization-wide model of sustainability transition inspired by the multilevel perspective framework. Our work thus contributes to the Sub-theme 54 of the 36th EGOS colloquium: Bridging Systems and Organizational Perspectives to Tackle Grand Challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Nabila Iken & Franck Aggeri & Stéphane Morel, 2020. "How to lead a sustainability transition at the company level? An approach based on management tools performativity [Comment mener une transition soutenable au niveau de l'entreprise ? Une approche ," Post-Print halshs-02903500, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02903500
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02903500v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02903500v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Berry, 1983. "Une technologie invisible - L'impact des instruments de gestion sur l'évolution des systèmes humains," Post-Print hal-00263141, HAL.
    2. Christophe Midler, 1995. "Projectification of the Firm : the Renault Case," Post-Print hal-00262524, HAL.
    3. Albert David & Armand Hatchuel, 2014. "Intervention research in management," Post-Print hal-01218881, HAL.
    4. Albert David & Armand Hatchuel, 2014. "Intervention Research in Management," Post-Print hal-01398754, HAL.
    5. Martin L. Weitzman, 2014. "Can Negotiating a Uniform Carbon Price Help to Internalize the Global Warming Externality?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 29-49.
    6. Franck Aggeri & Julie Labatut, 2011. "Looking at management through its instruments," Post-Print hal-00639734, HAL.
    7. Farla, Jacco & Markard, Jochen & Raven, Rob & Coenen, Lars, 2012. "Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(6), pages 991-998.
    8. Eve Chiapello & Patrick Gilbert, 2019. "Management Tools : A Social Sciences Perspective," Post-Print hal-02530197, HAL.
    9. Ness, Barry & Urbel-Piirsalu, Evelin & Anderberg, Stefan & Olsson, Lennart, 2007. "Categorising tools for sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 498-508, January.
    10. Miller, Peter & O'Leary, Ted, 2007. "Mediating instruments and making markets: Capital budgeting, science and the economy," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(7-8), pages 701-734.
    11. Midler, Christophe, 1995. ""Projectification" of the firm: The renault case," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 363-375, December.
    12. Michel Callon, 2006. "What does it mean to say that economics is performative?," CSI Working Papers Series 005, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    2. Peter B. Doeringer & Pacey Foster & Stephan Manning & David Terkla, 2013. "Project-based industries and craft-like production: structure, location and performance," Chapters, in: Frank Giarratani & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Philip McCann (ed.), Handbook of Industry Studies and Economic Geography, chapter 4, pages 99-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Małgorzata Ćwikła & Anna Góral & Ewa Bogacz-Wojtanowska & Magdalena Dudkiewicz, 2020. "Project-Based Work and Sustainable Development—A Comparative Case Study of Cultural Animation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-24, August.
    4. repec:hal:journl:hal-01070044 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Pierre-Antoine Arrighi & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2013. "Breaking the dilemma between robustness and generativeness: a comparative experiment on the use of new design software at the design-gap," Post-Print hal-00903606, HAL.
    6. Patrícia Marques & Paulo Sousa & Anabela Tereso, 2023. "Sustainability in Project Management: PM 2 versus PRiSM TM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-36, November.
    7. Gernot Grabher, 2002. "Cool Projects, Boring Institutions: Temporary Collaboration in Social Context," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 205-214.
    8. Mitsuru Kodama & Tomoatsu Shibata, 2013. "Research into Ambidextrous R&D in Product Development New Product Development at a Precision Device Maker," TMARG Discussion Papers 109, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    9. Fanny Simon & Albéric Tellier, 2016. "Balancing contradictory temporality during the unfold of innovation streams," Post-Print hal-01572302, HAL.
    10. Jorg Sydow & Udo Staber, 2002. "The Institutional Embeddedness of Project Networks: The Case of Content Production in German Television," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 215-227.
    11. Hala Alioua & Fanny Simon, 2017. "Managing time pacing in organizations transitioning to a project- based mode – 3 case studies of two multinational companies," Post-Print hal-01597589, HAL.
    12. Kaouthar Mlaouhi & Lilia Gzara & Céline Cholez, 2021. "Use of Competency Management Methods and Tools in Project-based Organizations," Post-Print hal-03842413, HAL.
    13. Franck Aggeri & Julie Labatut, 2010. "La gestion au prisme de ses instruments," Post-Print hal-02659906, HAL.
    14. David Dornisch, 2002. "The Evolution of Post-socialist Projects: Trajectory Shift and Transitional Capacity in a Polish Region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 307-321.
    15. Stéphanie Tillement & Frédéric Garcias & Guy Minguet & Florence Charue Duboc, 2019. "Disentangling Exploitation and Exploration in Hybrid Projects: The Case of a New Nuclear Reactor Development," Post-Print halshs-02276378, HAL.
    16. Shankar Sankaran & Mattias Jacobsson & Tomas Blomquist, 2021. "The history and future of projects as a transition innovation: Towards a sustainable project management framework," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 696-714, October.
    17. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.
    18. Terrien, Clara & Maniak, Rémi & Chen, Bo & Shaheen, Susan, 2016. "Good Practices for Advancing Urban Mobility Innovation: A Case Study of One-Way Carsharing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt53z3h2gt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    19. Frédéric Segonds & Julien Nelson & Améziane Aoussat, 2012. "PLM and architectural rehabilitation : a framework to improve collaboration in the early stages of design," Post-Print hal-00719169, HAL.
    20. Wagner Reinhard F. & Radujkovic Mladen, 2022. "Effects of lagging projectification in the public sector on realizing infrastructure projects," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 2559-2570, January.
    21. Thordur Vikingur Fridgeirsson & Helgi Thor Ingason & Haukur Ingi Jonasson & Bara Hlin Kristjansdottir, 2021. "The VUCAlity of Projects: A New Approach to Assess a Project Risk in a Complex World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02903500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.