IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00903606.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Breaking the dilemma between robustness and generativeness: a comparative experiment on the use of new design software at the design-gap

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre-Antoine Arrighi

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Pascal Le Masson

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Benoit Weil

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Are creative designers doomed to loose in creativity when integrated in NPD processes? While a lot of studies point the necessity to achieve both creativity and feasibility, it remains hard to make more than a frustrating trade off. Still a new generation of design software have recently been proposed to better integrate industrial designers in engineering design processes. Based on a comparative experiment, we show that some of these tools enable to break the dilemma between creativity and robustness. Focusing on the design gap, a sample of 6 industrial designers was asked to design from a handmade rough sketch a 3D-digital object integrated in a CAD software suite. We compare the performance in term of gain or loss of originality and robustness (measured by 5 independent experts) between the uses of two representative digital design tools. It appears that the use of one of the software significantly increased simultaneously to Generativeness and Robustness of a design. It confirms that it is possible to ground creativity on constraint and show the possibility of new design processes characterized by their capacity to avoid loss in Originality and to improve what we call an "acquired creativity" all along the design process.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre-Antoine Arrighi & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2013. "Breaking the dilemma between robustness and generativeness: a comparative experiment on the use of new design software at the design-gap," Post-Print hal-00903606, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00903606
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-00903606v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-00903606v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul R. Carlile, 2004. "Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 555-568, October.
    2. Christophe Midler, 1995. "Projectification of the Firm : the Renault Case," Post-Print hal-00262524, HAL.
    3. George M. Marakas & Joyce J. Elam, 1997. "Creativity Enhancement in Problem Solving: Through Software or Process?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(8), pages 1136-1146, August.
    4. Midler, Christophe, 1995. ""Projectification" of the firm: The renault case," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 363-375, December.
    5. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Benoit Weil, 2011. "The Interplay Between Creativity issues and Design Theories: a new perspective for Design Management Studies?," Post-Print hal-00696122, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.
    2. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    3. Terrien, Clara & Maniak, Rémi & Chen, Bo & Shaheen, Susan, 2016. "Good Practices for Advancing Urban Mobility Innovation: A Case Study of One-Way Carsharing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt53z3h2gt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Frédéric Segonds & Julien Nelson & Améziane Aoussat, 2012. "PLM and architectural rehabilitation : a framework to improve collaboration in the early stages of design," Post-Print hal-00719169, HAL.
    5. Nicolas Ricci & Sophie Hooge, 2024. "Caractériser la diversité des processus de création dans les Industries Culturelles et Créatives : une analyse qualitative comparée des régimes de conception créatifs," Post-Print hal-04759786, HAL.
    6. Wagner Reinhard F. & Radujkovic Mladen, 2022. "Effects of lagging projectification in the public sector on realizing infrastructure projects," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 2559-2570, January.
    7. Peter B. Doeringer & Pacey Foster & Stephan Manning & David Terkla, 2013. "Project-based industries and craft-like production: structure, location and performance," Chapters, in: Frank Giarratani & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Philip McCann (ed.), Handbook of Industry Studies and Economic Geography, chapter 4, pages 99-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Małgorzata Ćwikła & Anna Góral & Ewa Bogacz-Wojtanowska & Magdalena Dudkiewicz, 2020. "Project-Based Work and Sustainable Development—A Comparative Case Study of Cultural Animation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-24, August.
    9. repec:hal:journl:hal-01070044 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Thordur Vikingur Fridgeirsson & Helgi Thor Ingason & Haukur Ingi Jonasson & Bara Hlin Kristjansdottir, 2021. "The VUCAlity of Projects: A New Approach to Assess a Project Risk in a Complex World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, March.
    11. Martin Müller, 2014. "The Topological Multiplicities of Power: The Limits of Governing the Olympics," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 90(3), pages 321-339, July.
    12. Vasile-Ibrian CARAMIDARU, 2019. "The Projectification Of Nonprofit Organizations: Insights From (And For) Multi-Project Management Research," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 84-93, November.
    13. Marie-Alix Deval & Sophie Hooge & Benoit Weil, 2021. "The emergence of “experts of the unknown” – Learnings from Renault and SNCF," Post-Print hal-03264373, HAL.
    14. Bloomfield, Katherine & Williams, Terry & Bovis, Chris & Merali, Yasmin, 2019. "Systemic risk in major public contracts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 667-676.
    15. Patrícia Marques & Paulo Sousa & Anabela Tereso, 2023. "Sustainability in Project Management: PM 2 versus PRiSM TM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-36, November.
    16. Pierre-Antoine Arrighi & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2014. "Addressing Constraints Creatively: How New Design Software Helps Solve the Dilemma of Originality and Feasibility," Post-Print hal-01083248, HAL.
    17. Hana Krchová, 2019. "Project tools in relation to the implementation of the ability of innovation companies in Slovakia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 291-302, September.
    18. Gernot Grabher, 2002. "Cool Projects, Boring Institutions: Temporary Collaboration in Social Context," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 205-214.
    19. Anthony Hussenot & Viviane Sergi, 2018. "Collaborating Without (Formal) Organization: How Do Independent Workers Call Into Question the Matter of Organization?," Post-Print hal-01948575, HAL.
    20. Mitsuru Kodama & Tomoatsu Shibata, 2013. "Research into Ambidextrous R&D in Product Development New Product Development at a Precision Device Maker," TMARG Discussion Papers 109, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    21. Fanny Simon & Albéric Tellier, 2016. "Balancing contradictory temporality during the unfold of innovation streams," Post-Print hal-01572302, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industrial design; CAD; Creativity;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00903606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.