IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01271284.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corporate Risk Reporting: A study of The Impact of Risk Disclosure on Firms Reputation

Author

Listed:
  • Waël Louhichi

    (ESSCA Research Lab - ESSCA - Ecole Supérieure des Sciences Commerciales d'Angers)

  • Ousayna Zreik

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the influence of the communication about potential risk within annual reports on firm reputation. We use the content analysis to measure the risk reporting; and we consider the Most Admired Companies list published in Fortune magazine as a proxy for reputation. Our findings highlight that risk reporting affects positively compagny reputation. We check the robustness of these results for alternative empirical models (pooled OLS, fixed effects, and random effects) and, in addition, for alternative measurement of reputation. Our results provide support to legitimacy theory, as the disclosure of risk's information is a part of a social contract that should be rewarded with good reputation. Furthermore, we examine the behavior of risk reporting for high and low-risk firms. We show that risk disclosure behavior is sensitive to level of risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Waël Louhichi & Ousayna Zreik, 2015. "Corporate Risk Reporting: A study of The Impact of Risk Disclosure on Firms Reputation," Post-Print halshs-01271284, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01271284
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01271284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01271284/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan V. Scott & Geoff Walsham, 2005. "Reconceptualizing and Managing Reputation Risk in the Knowledge Economy: Toward Reputable Action," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 308-322, June.
    2. David L. Deephouse & Peter Jaskiewicz, 2013. "Do Family Firms Have Better Reputations Than Non-Family Firms? An Integration of Socioemotional Wealth and Social Identity Theories," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 337-360, May.
    3. Loughran, Tim & McDonald, Bill, 2013. "IPO first-day returns, offer price revisions, volatility, and form S-1 language," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 307-326.
    4. T. S. Breusch & A. R. Pagan, 1980. "The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 47(1), pages 239-253.
    5. Annemette Kjærgaard & Mette Morsing & Davide Ravasi, 2011. "Mediating Identity: A Study of Media Influence on Organizational Identity Construction in a Celebrity Firm," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 514-543, May.
    6. Armitage, Seth & Marston, Claire, 2008. "Corporate disclosure, cost of capital and reputation: Evidence from finance directors," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 314-336.
    7. David L. Deephouse & Suzanne M. Carter, 2005. "An Examination of Differences Between Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 329-360, March.
    8. Cravens, Karen & Goad Oliver, Elizabeth & Ramamoorti, Sridhar, 2003. "The Reputation Index:: Measuring and Managing Corporate Reputation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 201-212, April.
    9. Frank L. Heflin & Kenneth W. Shaw & John J. Wild, 2005. "Disclosure Policy and Market Liquidity: Impact of Depth Quotes and Order Sizes," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 829-865, December.
    10. Joseph Fuller & Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Just Say No to Wall Street: Putting a Stop to the Earnings Game," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 59-63, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salem Boumediene & Fatma Ezzahra Abdallah & Salma Ben Moussa & Emna Boumediene, 2022. "Internal Corporate Governance Mechanisms And Risk Disclosure: Evidence From Tunisia," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 14(1), pages 15-30.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wael Louhichi & Ousayna Zreik, 2015. "Corporate Risk Reporting: A study of The Impact of Risk Disclosure on Firms Reputation," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(4), pages 2395-2408.
    2. Torsten Oliver Salge & David Antons & Michael Barrett & Rajiv Kohli & Eivor Oborn & Stavros Polykarpou, 2022. "How IT Investments Help Hospitals Gain and Sustain Reputation in the Media: The Role of Signaling and Framing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 110-130, March.
    3. Oliver Schilke & Karen S. Cook, 2015. "Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 276-297, February.
    4. Moreno Domínguez, María Jesús & Martín Zamora, María Pilar & Serrano Czaia, Isabel & Rodríguez Ariza, Lázaro, 2022. "Reputation and leadership: a study about reputational transfer in family and non-family firms," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    5. Martina Sageder & Christine Mitter & Birgit Feldbauer‐Durstmüller, 2018. "Image and reputation of family firms: a systematic literature review of the state of research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 335-377, January.
    6. Annika Veh & Markus Göbel & Rick Vogel, 2019. "Corporate reputation in management research: a review of the literature and assessment of the concept," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 315-353, December.
    7. Naoki Ando, 2016. "Similarity to successful peers and the implications for subsidiary performance," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(2), pages 110-136, April.
    8. Gök, Osman & Peker, Sinem & Hacioglu, Gungor, 2015. "The marketing department’s reputation in the firm," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 366-380.
    9. Maria Cleofe Giorgino & Enrico Supino & Federico Barnabè, 2017. "Corporate Disclosure, Materiality, and Integrated Report: An Event Study Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Block, Jörn Hendrich, 2008. "Are CEOs in family firms paid like bureaucrats? Evidence from Bayesian and frequentist analyses," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2008-033, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    11. Vasiliki Baka, 2016. "Formative Reputation: From Being an Organizational Asset to Becoming a Process in The Making," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(2), pages 152-165, April.
    12. Ambra Mazzelli & Josip Kotlar & Alfredo De Massis, 2018. "Blending In While Standing Out: Selective Conformity and New Product Introduction in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(2), pages 206-230, March.
    13. Hooi Hooi Lean & Irene W.K. Ting, 2016. "Will Penang Based Companies Perform Better than the Market?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(1), pages 528-536.
    14. Goran Vlašić & Josef Langer, 2012. "Concept of reputation: different perspectives and robust empirical understandings," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 24(2), pages 219-244.
    15. Thams, Yannick & Alvarado-Vargas, Marcelo J. & Newburry, William, 2016. "Geographical diversification as a predictor of MNC reputations in their home nations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2882-2889.
    16. Levent Ataünal & Ali Osman Gürbüz & Asli Aybars, 2016. "Does High Growth Create Value for Shareholders? Evidence from S&P500 Firms," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(3), pages 25-38.
    17. Bammens, Yannick & Hünermund, Paul, 2023. "Ecological community logics, identifiable business ownership, and green innovation as a company response," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    18. Jerayr J. Haleblian & Michael D. Pfarrer & Jason T. Kiley, 2017. "High-Reputation Firms and Their Differential Acquisition Behaviors," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 2237-2254, November.
    19. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2008-033 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Deephouse, David L. & Newburry, William & Soleimani, Abrahim, 2016. "The effects of institutional development and national culture on cross-national differences in corporate reputation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 463-473.
    21. Anna Blajer-Golebiewska & Arkadiusz Kozlowski, 2016. "Financial determinants of corporate reputation: A short-term approach," Managerial Economics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 17(2), pages 179-201.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate Risk;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01271284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.