IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v61y2024i4p1498-1535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Elites‐Mutual‐Attraction Effect: How Relative Reputation Influences Employee Flows between Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • David Antons
  • Erk P. Piening
  • Torsten Oliver Salge

Abstract

In this study, we draw on signalling theory to examine the organization‐level relationship between reputation and employee movement in and out of organizations. Focusing on organizations’ media reputations relative to their peers, we map all employee flows between organizational dyads in a population of English hospitals. We find support for our main argument that an organization's relative reputation predicts employee mobility above and beyond what can be explained by its absolute level of reputation. In particular, our findings suggest that the number of employees moving between two organizations is highest when both organizations have a high reputation. We refer to this as the elites’ mutual attraction effect (EMA‐effect). We also find that the motives of voluntary leavers and geographical distance between two organizations influence the strength of this EMA‐effect. Overall, this study shows that developing and testing dyadic theory can extend research on organizational reputation and collective turnover in meaningful ways.

Suggested Citation

  • David Antons & Erk P. Piening & Torsten Oliver Salge, 2024. "The Elites‐Mutual‐Attraction Effect: How Relative Reputation Influences Employee Flows between Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1498-1535, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:61:y:2024:i:4:p:1498-1535
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12935
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:61:y:2024:i:4:p:1498-1535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.