IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01183114.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Finding one’s way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: a comparison of four epistemological frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Marie-José Avenier

    (Research Center - Léonard de Vinci Pôle Universitaire - De Vinci Research Center)

  • Catherine Thomas

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

Abstract

The expanding popularity of qualitative research, and more particularly case study research, in the field of Information Systems, Organization and Management research, seems to have been accompanied by an increasing divergence in the forms that this research takes, and by recurrent criticisms concerning its rigor. This paper develops a heuristic framework for guiding the design of a rigorous case study depending on the research's goal and epistemological framework, as well as for guiding its evaluation. It also highlights the fundamental reasons – namely the epistemological ones – for differences in the guidelines offered in the literature for conducting high quality case studies. In agreement with numerous authors, we argue for contingent evaluation criteria. We supplement these authors' works in two ways: (1) we consider various epistemological frameworks that do not appear in the classifications that they use, especially including critical realism and pragmatic constructivism; (2) we propose a set of contingent criteria to be used as a heuristic device for critically and knowledgeably building rigorous case studies within different epistemological traditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie-José Avenier & Catherine Thomas, 2015. "Finding one’s way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: a comparison of four epistemological frameworks," Post-Print halshs-01183114, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01183114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marie-Noëlle Albert & Nadia Lazzari Dodeler & Asri Yves Ohin, 2022. "How Organizations can Develop Solidarity in the Workplace? A Case Study," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 327-346, October.
    2. Labrouche, Geoffroy & Levy, Rachel, 2019. "Pourquoi rester en « ville moyenne » ? Le cas d’entreprises agroalimentaires d’Occitanie," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 368(April-Jun).
    3. Anne-Claire Savy, 2019. "How transition towards circular economy is organising ? Experience of a collective of alternative organisations [Quel mode d'organisation pour la transition vers l'économie circulaire ? L'expérienc," Post-Print hal-02556201, HAL.
    4. Jane Parker & Janet Sayers & Amanda Young‐Hauser & Shirley Barnett & Patricia Loga & Selu Paea, 2022. "Gender and ethnic equity in Aotearoa New Zealand's public service before and since Covid‐19: Toward intersectional inclusion?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 110-130, January.
    5. Sandrine Benoist, 2021. "Farmers' Job Strain: A Conservation of Resources Theory Approach [Stress professionnel chez les exploitants agricoles : une approche par la théorie de conservation des ressources]," Post-Print hal-03262804, HAL.
    6. Zaga-Mendez, Alejandra & Bissonnette, Jean-François & Kolinjivadi, Vijay & Cleaver, Frances & Dupras, Jérôme, 2021. "Towards collective action in ecosystem services governance: The recognition of social interdependencies in three collective agri-environmental initiatives in Quebec," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    7. Nadia Lazzari Dodeler & Marie-Noêlle Albert, 2017. "Développer des communautés de personnes pour manager la diversité en entreprise," Post-Print hal-01865910, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01183114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.