IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00875606.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The influence of waiting times on cost-effectiveness: a case study of colorectal cancer mass screening

Author

Listed:
  • Pauline Chauvin

    (Epidémiologie, Systèmes d'Information, Modélisation - UPMC - Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP] - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) - SU - Sorbonne Université)

  • Jean-Michel Josselin

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Denis Heresbach

    (Centre Hospitalier de Cannes - Centre Hospitalier de Cannes - Centre Hospitalier de Cannes)

Abstract

When a cost-effectiveness analysis is implemented, the health-care system is usually assumed to adjust smoothly to the proposed new strategy. However, technological innovations in health care may often induce friction in the organization of care supply, implying the congestion of services and subsequent waiting times. Our objective here is to measure how these short run rigidities can challenge cost-effectiveness recommendations favorable to an innovative mass screening test for colorectal cancer. Using Markov modeling, we compare the standard Guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) with an innovative screening test for colorectal cancer, namely the immunological fecal occult blood test (iFOBT). Waiting time can occur between a positive screening test and the subsequent confirmation colonoscopy. Five scenarios are considered for iFOBT: no further waiting time compared with gFOBT, twice as much waiting time for a period of 5 or 10 years, and twice as much waiting time for a period of 5 or 10 years combined with a 25 % decrease in participation to confirmation colonoscopies. According to our modeling, compared with gFOBT, iFOBT would approximately double colonoscopy demand. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis enables concluding that the waiting time significantly increases the uncertainty surrounding recommendations favorable to iFOBT if it induces a decrease in the adherence rate for confirmation colonoscopy.

Suggested Citation

  • Pauline Chauvin & Jean-Michel Josselin & Denis Heresbach, 2014. "The influence of waiting times on cost-effectiveness: a case study of colorectal cancer mass screening," Post-Print halshs-00875606, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00875606
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-013-0525-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pauline Chauvin & Jean-Michel Josselin & Denis Heresbach, 2012. "Incremental net benefit and acceptability of alternative health policies: a case study of mass screening for colorectal cancer," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(3), pages 237-250, June.
    2. Laurence Clerc & Valérie Jooste & Catherine Lejeune & Bernard Schmitt & Patrick Arveux & Catherine Quantin & Jean Faivre & Anne-Marie Bouvier, 2008. "Cost of care of colorectal cancers according to health care patterns and stage at diagnosis in France," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 9(4), pages 361-367, November.
    3. Johannesson, Magnus & Johansson, Per-Olov & Soderqvist, Tore, 1998. "Time spent on waiting lists for medical care: an insurance approach," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 627-644, October.
    4. Célia Berchi & Véronique Bouvier & Jean‐Marie Réaud & Guy Launoy, 2004. "Cost‐effectiveness analysis of two strategies for mass screening for colorectal cancer in France," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 227-238, March.
    5. Karine Chevreul, 2010. "Colorectal cancer in France," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 10(1), pages 15-20, January.
    6. Willemien Schurer, 2010. "The status of colorectal cancer care in the Netherlands: past, present and future," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 10(1), pages 51-56, January.
    7. Imre Boncz & Valentin Brodszky & Márta Péntek & István Ágoston & Zsolt Nagy & Krisztián Kárpáti & Ildikó Kriszbacher & Péter Fuszek & László Gulácsi, 2010. "The disease burden of colorectal cancer in Hungary," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 10(1), pages 35-40, January.
    8. Gijs Wetering & Willem Woertman & Eddy Adang, 2012. "Time to incorporate time in cost-effectiveness analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(3), pages 223-226, June.
    9. Bjorn Berg & Brian Denton & Heidi Nelson & Hari Balasubramanian & Ahmed Rahman & Angela Bailey & Keith Lindor, 2010. "A Discrete Event Simulation Model to Evaluate Operational Performance of a Colonoscopy Suite," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(3), pages 380-387, May.
    10. Eddy Adang, 2008. "Economic evaluation of innovative technologies in health care should include a short-run perspective," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 9(4), pages 381-384, November.
    11. Farnworth, Michael G., 2003. "A game theoretic model of the relationship between prices and waiting times," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 47-60, January.
    12. Celia Berchi & V. Bouvier & J.M. Reaud & G. Launoy, 2004. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of two strategies for mass screening for colorectal cancer in France," Post-Print halshs-00071299, HAL.
    13. Willemien Schurer & Panos Kanavos, 2010. "Colorectal cancer management in the United Kingdom: current practice and challenges," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 10(1), pages 85-90, January.
    14. Karsten Vrangbaek & Mikkel Nielsen, 2010. "Colorectal cancer care in Denmark: status and dilemmas," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 10(1), pages 5-13, January.
    15. Panos Kanavos & Willemien Schurer, 2010. "The dynamics of colorectal cancer management in 17 countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 10(1), pages 115-129, January.
    16. Koopmanschap, M.A. & Brouwer, W.B.F. & Hakkaart-van Roijen, L. & van Exel, N.J.A., 2005. "Influence of waiting time on cost-effectiveness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 2501-2504, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aida Ribera & John Slof & Ignacio Ferreira-González & Vicente Serra & Bruno García-del Blanco & Purificació Cascant & Rut Andrea & Carlos Falces & Enrique Gutiérrez & Raquel del Valle-Fernández & Césa, 2018. "The impact of waiting for intervention on costs and effectiveness: the case of transcatheter aortic valve replacement," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(7), pages 945-956, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pauline Chauvin & Jean-Michel Josselin & Denis Heresbach, 2012. "Incremental net benefit and acceptability of alternative health policies: a case study of mass screening for colorectal cancer," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(3), pages 237-250, June.
    2. Alexandre Marinho, 2004. "Um Estudo Sobre as Filas Para Internações e Para Transplantes no Sistema Único de Saúde Brasileiro," Discussion Papers 1055, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    3. Ulrike Haug & Susanne Engel & Frank Verheyen & Roland Linder, 2014. "Estimating Colorectal Cancer Treatment Costs: A Pragmatic Approach Exemplified by Health Insurance Data from Germany," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-5, February.
    4. Gijs Wetering & Willem Woertman & Andre Verbeek & Mireille Broeders & Eddy Adang, 2013. "Quantifying short run cost-effectiveness during a gradual implementation process," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(6), pages 911-918, December.
    5. L. Tilson & L. Sharp & C. Usher & C. Walsh & Whyte S & A. O’Ceilleachair & C. Stuart & B. Mehigan & M. John Kennedy & P. Tappenden & J. Chilcott & A. Staines & H. Comber & M. Barry, 2012. "Cost of care for colorectal cancer in Ireland: a health care payer perspective," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(4), pages 511-524, August.
    6. Weidong Huang & Guoxiang Liu & Xin Zhang & Wenqi Fu & Shu Zheng & Qunhong Wu & Chaojie Liu & Yang Liu & Shanrong Cai & Yanqin Huang, 2014. "Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Protocols in Urban Chinese Populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-8, October.
    7. Panos Kanavos & Willemien Schurer, 2010. "The dynamics of colorectal cancer management in 17 countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 10(1), pages 115-129, January.
    8. Koopmanschap, M.A. & Brouwer, W.B.F. & Hakkaart-van Roijen, L. & van Exel, N.J.A., 2005. "Influence of waiting time on cost-effectiveness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 2501-2504, June.
    9. N. Exel & Marion Ruiter & Werner Brouwer, 2008. "When Time is Not on Your Side," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 1(1), pages 55-71, January.
    10. Célia Berchi & Jean-Marc Dupuis & Guy Launoy, 2006. "The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(2), pages 91-98, June.
    11. Kozlowski, Dawid & Worthington, Dave, 2015. "Use of queue modelling in the analysis of elective patient treatment governed by a maximum waiting time policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 331-338.
    12. Kim Jeong & John Cairns, 2013. "Review of economic evidence in the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Richard D. Smith, 2003. "Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care:a critical assessment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(8), pages 609-628, August.
    14. Vasco F. Alves, 2019. "Pricing and waiting time decisions in a health care market with private and public provision," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 174-195, January.
    15. Hugh Gravelle & Luigi Siciliani, 2009. "Third degree waiting time discrimination: optimal allocation of a public sector healthcare treatment under rationing by waiting," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(8), pages 977-986, August.
    16. Heinrich Nils & Wübker Ansgar & Wuckel Christiane, 2018. "Waiting Times for Outpatient Treatment in Germany: New Experimental Evidence from Primary Data," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 238(5), pages 375-394, September.
    17. Brekke, Kurt R. & Siciliani, Luigi & Straume, Odd Rune, 2008. "Competition and waiting times in hospital markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 1607-1628, July.
    18. Rinaldo Brau & Gianluca Fiorentini & Matteo Lippi Bruni & Anna Maria Pinna, 2004. "La disponibilità a pagare per la copertura del rischio di non autosufficienza: analisi econometrica e valutazioni di "policy"," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 357-388.
    19. Adang, Eddy M.M. & Wensing, Michel, 2008. "Economic barriers to implementation of innovations in health care: Is the long run-short run efficiency discrepancy a paradox?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2-3), pages 236-242, December.
    20. Buckley, Neil J. & Cuff, Katherine & Hurley, Jeremiah & McLeod, Logan & Mestelman, Stuart & Cameron, David, 2012. "An experimental investigation of mixed systems of public and private health care finance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 713-729.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Health-care organization; cost-effectiveness analysis; waiting time; colorectal cancer screening; Markov model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00875606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.