IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v10y2010i1p115-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dynamics of colorectal cancer management in 17 countries

Author

Listed:
  • Panos Kanavos
  • Willemien Schurer

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Panos Kanavos & Willemien Schurer, 2010. "The dynamics of colorectal cancer management in 17 countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 10(1), pages 115-129, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:10:y:2010:i:1:p:115-129
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-009-0201-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10198-009-0201-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-009-0201-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorte Gyrd‐Hansen & Jes Søggard & Ole Kronborg, 1998. "Colorectal cancer screening: efficiency and effectiveness," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(1), pages 9-20, February.
    2. Célia Berchi & Véronique Bouvier & Jean‐Marie Réaud & Guy Launoy, 2004. "Cost‐effectiveness analysis of two strategies for mass screening for colorectal cancer in France," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 227-238, March.
    3. David K. Whynes & Aileen R. Neilson & Andrew R. Walker & Jack D. Hardcastle, 1998. "Faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer: is it cost‐effective?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(1), pages 21-29, February.
    4. Celia Berchi & V. Bouvier & J.M. Reaud & G. Launoy, 2004. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of two strategies for mass screening for colorectal cancer in France," Post-Print halshs-00071299, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. L. Tilson & L. Sharp & C. Usher & C. Walsh & Whyte S & A. O’Ceilleachair & C. Stuart & B. Mehigan & M. John Kennedy & P. Tappenden & J. Chilcott & A. Staines & H. Comber & M. Barry, 2012. "Cost of care for colorectal cancer in Ireland: a health care payer perspective," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(4), pages 511-524, August.
    2. Brown, Sally & Castelli, Michele & Hunter, David J. & Erskine, Jonathan & Vedsted, Peter & Foot, Catherine & Rubin, Greg, 2014. "How might healthcare systems influence speed of cancer diagnosis: A narrative review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 56-63.
    3. Ulrike Haug & Susanne Engel & Frank Verheyen & Roland Linder, 2014. "Estimating Colorectal Cancer Treatment Costs: A Pragmatic Approach Exemplified by Health Insurance Data from Germany," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-5, February.
    4. Pauline Chauvin & Jean-Michel Josselin & Denis Heresbach, 2014. "The influence of waiting times on cost-effectiveness: a case study of colorectal cancer mass screening," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(8), pages 801-812, November.
    5. Ilona Székely Kovácsné & Éva Fenyvesi & Tibor Pintér, 2023. "Principal Component Analysis - Points of Association Between Cancer and Economic Development," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 15(2), pages 91-130, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pauline Chauvin & Jean-Michel Josselin & Denis Heresbach, 2014. "The influence of waiting times on cost-effectiveness: a case study of colorectal cancer mass screening," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(8), pages 801-812, November.
    2. Magnus Johannesson & David Meltzer, 1998. "Editorial: Some reflections on cost‐effectiveness analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, February.
    3. Weidong Huang & Guoxiang Liu & Xin Zhang & Wenqi Fu & Shu Zheng & Qunhong Wu & Chaojie Liu & Yang Liu & Shanrong Cai & Yanqin Huang, 2014. "Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Protocols in Urban Chinese Populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-8, October.
    4. Whynes, David K. & Frew, Emma & Wolstenholme, Jane L., 2003. "A comparison of two methods for eliciting contingent valuations of colorectal cancer screening," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 555-574, July.
    5. Célia Berchi & Jean-Marc Dupuis & Guy Launoy, 2006. "The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(2), pages 91-98, June.
    6. Pieter H. M. van Baal & Talitha L. Feenstra & Rudolf T. Hoogenveen & G. Ardine de Wit & Werner B. F. Brouwer, 2007. "Unrelated medical care in life years gained and the cost utility of primary prevention: in search of a ‘perfect’ cost–utility ratio," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(4), pages 421-433, April.
    7. Dorte Gyrd‐Hansen & Jes Søgaard, 2001. "Analysing public preferences for cancer screening programmes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(7), pages 617-634, October.
    8. Dieter Tscheulin & Florian Drevs, 2010. "The relevance of unrelated costs internal and external to the healthcare sector to the outcome of a cost-comparison analysis of secondary prevention: the case of general colorectal cancer screening in," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 11(2), pages 141-150, April.
    9. Eline Aas, 2009. "Pecuniary compensation increases participation in screening for colorectal cancer," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(3), pages 337-354, March.
    10. Emma J. Frew & David K. Whynes & Jane L. Wolstenholme, 2003. "Eliciting Willingness to Pay: Comparing Closed-Ended with Open-Ended and Payment Scale Formats," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(2), pages 150-159, March.
    11. Bengt Liljas & Göran S. Karlsson & Nils‐Olov Stålhammar, 2008. "On future non‐medical costs in economic evaluations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(5), pages 579-591, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Colorectal cancer; Access; Availability; Affordability; Health technology assessment; Screening; Practice guidelines; Quality of care; Cancer management; Health policy; I11; I12; I18;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:10:y:2010:i:1:p:115-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.