IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00580543.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La théorie enracinée en pratique : vers un dépassement de la tension entre scientificité et créativité dans les recherches basées sur la théorie enracinée ?

Author

Listed:
  • Lionel Garreau

    (Management & Organisation - DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Rodrigo Bandeira-De-Mello

    (DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, FGV-EAESP - Fundação Getúlio Vargas - Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo = Fundação Getulio Vargas’s Sao Paulo School of Business Administration - FGV - Fundacao Getulio Vargas [Rio de Janeiro])

Abstract

De nombreuses recherches ont mis en évidence les difficultés de la conduite d'une recherche utilisant la méthodologie de la théorie enracinée. D'une méthode prometteuse sur le plan de l'innovation et de la rigueur scientifique, elle peut apparaître comme un cauchemar pour le chercheur qui la pratique (Goulding, 2001). Nous montrons qu'au-delà des aspects techniques de la théorie enracinée, qui peuvent se montrer très contraignants, une des difficultés majeures de la théorie enracinée tient en la tension constante entre créativité et scientificité. Nous proposons de dépasser cette tension en mobilisant le cadre proposé par Alvesson, Hardy, & Harley (2008) dans leur étude de la réflexivité. Ce recadrage permet de montrer que créativité et scientificité peuvent se compléter, voire se renforcer dans le cadre de la théorie enracinée.

Suggested Citation

  • Lionel Garreau & Rodrigo Bandeira-De-Mello, 2010. "La théorie enracinée en pratique : vers un dépassement de la tension entre scientificité et créativité dans les recherches basées sur la théorie enracinée ?," Post-Print halshs-00580543, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00580543
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00580543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00580543/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mats Alvesson & Cynthia Hardy & Bill Harley, 2008. "Reflecting on Reflexivity: Reflexive Textual Practices in Organization and Management Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 480-501, May.
    2. Giuseppe Labianca & Barbara Gray & Daniel J. Brass, 2000. "A Grounded Model of Organizational Schema Change During Empowerment," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 235-257, April.
    3. Alain Asquin & Gilles Garel & Thierry Picq, 2007. "Le côté sombre des projets :Quand les individus et les collectifs sociaux sont mis en danger par le travail en projet," Post-Print hal-00363797, HAL.
    4. Lionel Garreau & Rodrigo Bandeira-De-Mello, 2009. "How to develop creativity in Grounded Theory? Epistemological choices and operational strategies in the quest for creativity," Post-Print halshs-00666309, HAL.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2799 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Lionel Garreau & Rodrigo Bandeira-De-Mello, 2009. "What do you do to develop creativity in Grounded Theory? Using Art knowledge in constant comparison," Post-Print halshs-00368603, HAL.
    7. Alain Asquin & Gilles Garel & Thierry Picq, 2007. "Quand les individus et les collectifs sociaux sont mis en danger par le travail en projet," Post-Print halshs-00687924, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4798 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Léna Masson, 2018. "La coopération interprofessionnelle, antécédent à la performance inter-organisationnelle ?," Post-Print hal-01897730, HAL.
    3. Chahed, Yasmine & Charnock, Robert & Du Rietz, Sabina & Joseph Lennon, Niels & Palermo, Tommaso & Parisi, Cristiana & Pflueger, Dane & Sundström, Andreas & Toh, Dorothy & Yu, Lichen, 2024. "The value of research activities “other than” publishing articles: reflections on an experimental workshop series," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121656, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Stefan W. Konlechner & Barbara Müller & Wolfgang H. Güttel & Irina Koprax & Karin Link, 2016. "Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing: The Role of Artifacts in Interpretive Schema Change," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 17(2), pages 129-150, August.
    5. Robert, Kihlberg & Ola, Lindberg, 2021. "Reflexive sensegiving: An open-ended process of influencing the sensemaking of others during organizational change," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 476-486.
    6. Dvora Yanow & Haridimos Tsoukas, 2009. "What is Reflection‐In‐Action? A Phenomenological Account," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 1339-1364, December.
    7. Samir L. Vaz & Anneloes M. L. Raes & Mariano L. M. Heyden, 2022. "Realizing implementation through relational exchanges with top managers: the mediating role of middle managers’ divergent strategic behavior," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 81-108, March.
    8. Haina Zhang, 2017. "Complexity absorption: a processual strategic approach to corporate entrepreneurship strategy," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Stephen Allen & Ann L. Cunliffe & Mark Easterby-Smith, 2019. "Understanding Sustainability Through the Lens of Ecocentric Radical-Reflexivity: Implications for Management Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 781-795, February.
    10. Catherine Durnell Cramton & Tine Köhler & Raymond E. Levitt, 2021. "Using scripts to address cultural and institutional challenges of global project coordination," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(1), pages 56-77, February.
    11. Utz Schäffer & Philip Matlachowsky, 2008. "Warum die Balanced Scorecard nur selten als strategisches Managementsystem genutzt wird," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 207-232, August.
    12. Sally Maitlis & Scott Sonenshein, 2010. "Sensemaking in Crisis and Change: Inspiration and Insights From Weick (1988)," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 551-580, May.
    13. Innan Sasaki & Josip Kotlar & Davide Ravasi & Eero Vaara, 2020. "Dealing with revered past: Historical identity statements and strategic change in Japanese family firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 590-623, March.
    14. Roth, Steffen, 2021. "The great reset of management and organization theory. A European perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 538-544.
    15. Gideon D. Markman & Donald S. Siegel & Mike Wright, 2008. "Research and Technology Commercialization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1401-1423, December.
    16. Alberto Ferraris & Gabriele Santoro & Anna Claudia Pellicelli, 2020. "“Openness” of public governments in smart cities: removing the barriers for innovation and entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1259-1280, December.
    17. Vivien Blanchet & Véronique Magista & Véronique Perret, 2013. "Stop filling in the gaps! Rethinking organizational justice through problematization," Post-Print halshs-00844204, HAL.
    18. Niyati Kataria & Glen Kreiner & Elaine Hollensbe & Mathew L Sheep & Jeff Stambaugh, 2018. "The catalytic role of emotions in sensemaking: Evidence from the blogosphere," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(3), pages 456-475, August.
    19. Kimberly D. Elsbach & Pamela S. Barr & Andrew B. Hargadon, 2005. "Identifying Situated Cognition in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 422-433, August.
    20. Kirsten Martin & Bidhan Parmar, 2012. "Assumptions in Decision Making Scholarship: Implications for Business Ethics Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 289-306, February.
    21. Bolzani, Daniela & Marabello, Selenia & Honig, Benson, 2020. "Exploring the multi-level processes of legitimacy in transnational social enterprises," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00580543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.