IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04631665.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

De l'idée innovante à la co-créativité sous contrainte : constitution, dynamique et coordination d'équipes de projets Hackathon

Author

Listed:
  • Sabine Cullmann

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Inès Guguen-Gicquel

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - Nantes Univ - IAE Nantes - Nantes Université - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - Nantes Université - pôle Sociétés - Nantes Univ - Nantes Université)

Abstract

Les Hackathons sont l'illustration par excellence de cocréation sous contraintes, ils ont été repris dans de nombreux domaines et leur scénarisation impressionnante contribue à en augmenter considérablement l'attractivité. Cependant, peu de recherches portent sur la manière dont les équipes de projet ad hoc se constituent et se structurent, sur leurs dynamiques et leur effet global sur la co-créativité dans un contexte soumis à de très fortes contraintes. Effectivement, un Hackathon se positionne dans le paradoxe des contraintes de la co-créativité par la mise en tension entre liberté et contrainte. L'objectif de notre travail est de répondre à cette question par une approche en entonnoir : des Grounds en général, aux contraintes spécifiques aux Hackathons puis les dynamiques de développement interne des équipes. Notre recherche a été menée pendant un Hackathon en santé et repose sur l'analyse de trois études de cas, documentées pendent les cinquante heures de l'événement à l'aide de vidéos et d'observations. Notre analyse permet de décomposer i) la dynamique d'un Hackathon et de ses acteurs appartenant aux différents territoires créatifs, et ii) les dispositifs de coordination du processus de transformation d'une idée créative vers l'innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabine Cullmann & Inès Guguen-Gicquel, 2024. "De l'idée innovante à la co-créativité sous contrainte : constitution, dynamique et coordination d'équipes de projets Hackathon," Post-Print hal-04631665, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04631665
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04631665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04631665/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olfa Gréselle-Zaïbet & Aurélie Kleber & Cécile Dejoux, 2018. "Le hackathon en mode Design Thinking ou quelles modalités pour former à des compétences méthodologiques et comportementales ?," Post-Print hal-02642516, HAL.
    2. Olfa Gréselle-Zaïbet & Aurélie Kleber & Cécile Dejoux, 2018. "Le hackathon en mode Design Thinking ou quelles modalités pour former à des compétences méthodologiques et comportementales ?," Post-Print hal-02103403, HAL.
    3. Stephen Sirris & Tone Lindheim & Harald Askeland, 2022. "Observation and Shadowing: Two Methods to Research Values and Values Work in Organisations and Leadership," Springer Books, in: Gry Espedal & Beate Jelstad Løvaas & Stephen Sirris & Arild Wæraas (ed.), Researching Values, chapter 8, pages 133-151, Springer.
    4. Patrick Cohendet & David Grandadam & Laurent Simon, 2010. "The Anatomy of the Creative City," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 91-111.
    5. Nada Endrissat, 2018. "Hackathons: A field of dreams for ‘collaborative innovation’?. A review of recent studies," Entreprendre & innover, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 69-75.
    6. Olfa Gréselle-Zaïbet & Aurélie Kleber & Cécile Dejoux, 2018. "Le hackathon en mode Design Thinking ou quelles modalités pour former à des compétences méthodologiques et comportementales ?," Post-Print hal-02110898, HAL.
    7. Julie Fabbri & Olivier Toutain & Anna Glaser, 2018. "Hackathons & Co : entre fascination et rejet," Entreprendre & innover, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 5-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inès Guguen-Gicquel & Sabine Cullmann, 2024. "Valoriser l'espace d'apprentissage des Hackathons par l'approche des territoires créatifs," Post-Print hal-04631679, HAL.
    2. Khoudia Guèye & Loïc Comino & Antonietta Specogna & Karine Useldinger & Hélène Yildiz, 2021. "L’innovation, potentiel levier d’attractivité territoriale," Post-Print hal-03517265, HAL.
    3. Boeing, Philipp & Wang, Yihan, 2021. "Decoding China's Covid-19 "virus exceptionalism": Community-based digital contact tracing in Wuhan," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-028, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Basile Michel, 2021. "Creative spaces through the lens of scene. Analysis of the spatial embedding of an artistic community in the M50 district in Shanghai [Les territoires créatifs au prisme de la scène. Analyse de l’e," Post-Print halshs-03365206, HAL.
    5. Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay & Angélo Battaglia, 2013. "A comparative approach to doing research on cities: comparing North American cities to others," Chapters, in: Peter Karl Kresl & Jaime Sobrino (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Urban Economies, chapter 5, pages 97-126, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Aurélie LALANNE & Guillaume POUYANNE, 2012. "Ten years of metropolization in economics: a bibliometric approach (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-11, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    7. Raphaël Suire, 2016. "Place, platform, and knowledge co-production dynamics: Evidence from makers and FabLab," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1623, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2016.
    8. Rammer, Christian & Kinne, Jan & Blind, Knut, 2016. "Microgeography of innovation in the city: Location patterns of innovative firms in Berlin," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-080, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Jane Zheng, 2021. "STRUCTURING ARTISTIC CREATIVITY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A ‘CREATIVE CITY’: Urban Sculpture Planning in Shanghai," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 795-813, September.
    10. Mickael Benaim & Jean-Alain Héraud & Valérie Mérindol, 2016. "Scientific connectivity of European regions: towards a typology of cooperative schemes," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 155-176.
    11. Albert David & Céline Mounier, 2021. "Working in middleground mode: creative communities and intermediary institutions [Trabajar en modo middleground: colectivos creativos e instituciones intermediarias]," Post-Print halshs-03241596, HAL.
    12. Kinne, Jan & Resch, Bernd, 2017. "Analysing and predicting micro-location patterns of software firms," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-063, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Patrick Cohendet & David Grandadam & Raphaël Suire, 2021. "Reconsidering the dynamics of local knowledge creation: Middlegrounds and local innovation commons in the case of FabLabs," Post-Print hal-03622101, HAL.
    14. Roberto Antonietti, 2011. "From creativity to innovativeness: micro evidence from Italy," Openloc Working Papers 1117, Public policies and local development.
    15. Muilu Toivo & Kotavaara Niina, 2011. "Diffusion, social structure and functioning of scientific rural networks: comparison of European and Finish examples," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 66-82, January.
    16. Claussen, Jörg & Falck, Oliver & Grohsjean, Thorsten, 2012. "The strength of direct ties: Evidence from the electronic game industry," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 223-230.
    17. James Boyer, 2020. "Toward an Evolutionary and Sustainability Perspective of the Innovation Ecosystem: Revisiting the Panarchy Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Sebastien Chantelot & Peres Stephanie & Virol Stephane, 2011. "From Talent to Creative City: Towards a conceptual framework," ERSA conference papers ersa11p373, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Basile Michel & Charles Ambrosino, 2019. "Territorialised or without commitment: An in-depth analysis of ‘‘cultural and creative’’ activities in a post-industrial neighbourhood in Grenoble [Territorialisées ou sans attaches : les activités," Post-Print hal-02139388, HAL.
    20. Neil Lee & Andr�s Rodr�guez-Pose, 2014. "Innovation in Creative Cities: Evidence from British Small Firms," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 494-512, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04631665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.