IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04487398.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La signification de l'événement - une question de temps ? Une approche heideggérienne pour résoudre la coexistence de deux ontologies temporelles différentes

Author

Listed:
  • Bettina Bouchayer

    (LIRSA - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en sciences de l'action - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM])

Abstract

Dans la recherche du changement organisationnel, le recours à la philosophie en vue d'une théorisation temporelle plus dynamique semble de plus en plus courante. Dans un monde turbulent et dynamique, qualifié d'imprévisible, les outils de gestion, identifiant des phénomènes organisationnels comme un objet par des caractéristiques attribuées, ne donnent plus satisfaction. Le paradigme de linéarité et de stabilité sous-jacent aux outils de gestion renvoie à la question de la théorisation temporelle des phénomènes dans le déplacement temporel du passé-présent-futur. Les chercheurs, notamment ceux qui se positionnent dans des approches processuelles voire dynamiques, mobilisent la philosophie pour aborder les concepts de « temporalité » ou de « temps » pour faire face à cette imprévisibilité. Nous allons au travers de la littérature organisationnelle, dans sa signification étendue, clarifier pour quelle problématique temporelle l'approche heideggérienne est mobilisée. L'objectif sera d'élargir la compréhension temporelle de l'événement et sa signification en lien avec le concept temporel appliqué. Pour cela, nous recourons à Heidegger (1916) pour répondre à la question de la fonction du temps, ou sa scientificité, c'est à dire quelle structure temporelle (du concept du temps) rendra la science fonctionnelle par rapport à son objectif poursuivi. Cela nous amène à proposer sur la base d'un temps qualitative-historique une approche symbolique de l'évènement organisationnel, permettant de voir comment les événements prennent leur sens dans le flux du temps et comment faire le lien entre un temps quantitatif et qualitatif, ce qui signifie deux ontologies temporelles différentes. Les résultats ne nous guident pas seulement vers l'existence de multiples représentations de réalité, mais ouvrent également sur leur coexistence, interdépendance et superposition temporelle au sein du même processus organisationnel.

Suggested Citation

  • Bettina Bouchayer, 2023. "La signification de l'événement - une question de temps ? Une approche heideggérienne pour résoudre la coexistence de deux ontologies temporelles différentes," Post-Print hal-04487398, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04487398
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04487398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04487398/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eero Vaara & Richard Whittington, 2012. "Strategy as practice : Taking Social Practices Seriously," Post-Print hal-02276672, HAL.
    2. Hernes, Tor & Weik, Elke, 2007. "Organization as process: Drawing a line between endogenous and exogenous views," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 251-264, September.
    3. Bakken, Tore & Holt, Robin & Zundel, Mike, 2013. "Time and play in management practice: An investigation through the philosophies of McTaggart and Heidegger," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 13-22.
    4. Eero Vaara & Richard Whittington, 2012. "Strategy as practice : Taking Social Practices Seriously," Post-Print hal-02312709, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Filippo Corsini & Rafael Laurenti & Franziska Meinherz & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora, 2019. "The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. S. Ignat'ev V. & С. Игнатьев В., 2018. "Оценка И Выбор Форм Государственного Регулирования Интенсификации Экономического Роста // Evaluation And Choice Of Forms Of State Regulation Of Intensification Of Economic Growth," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 22(1), pages 22-31.
    3. Elbasha, Tamim & Avetisyan, Emma, 2018. "A framework to study strategizing activities at the field level: The example of CSR rating agencies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 38-46.
    4. Phillips, Paul & Moutinho, Luiz, 2014. "Critical review of strategic planning research in hospitality and tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 96-120.
    5. Kennedy, Aileen & O'gorman, Colm & Lee, Kenneth, 2021. "Have your cake and eat it? Combining structure and agency in management research," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112720, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Anne Kokkonen & Pauli Alin, 2015. "Practice-based learning in construction projects: a literature review," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 513-530, July.
    7. Poul Houman Andersen & Lars Esbjerg, 2020. "Weaving a strategy for a base‐of‐the‐pyramid market: The case of Grundfos LIFELINK," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3687-3701, December.
    8. Paris Chrysos, 2018. "Empathy in the business model: how Facebook and Google Maps manage external problem-solving processes," Working Papers halshs-01897205, HAL.
    9. Jarzabkowski, Paula & Paul Spee, Andreas & Smets, Michael, 2013. "Material artifacts: Practices for doing strategy with ‘stuff’," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 41-54.
    10. Silvia Gherardi & Oliver Laasch, 2022. "Responsible Management-as-Practice: Mobilizing a Posthumanist Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 269-281, November.
    11. Alexandra Michel, 2014. "The Mutual Constitution of Persons and Organizations: An Ontological Perspective on Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1082-1110, August.
    12. Raelin, Joseph A., 2023. "Leadership-as-Practice: Its Past History, Present Emergence, and Future Potential," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2(2), pages 19-30.
    13. Lisa Blix Germundsson & Sören Augustinsson & Alina Lidén, 2020. "Collaboration in the Making—Towards a Practice-Based Approach to University Innovation Intermediary Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Rebecca Chunghee Kim & Akira Saito & V. Mohan Avvari, 0. "Interpretation and integration of “creating shared value” in Asia: implications for strategy research and practice," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-28.
    15. Oloba Peter Babajide & Clive Smith, 2022. "Teachers’ Challenges in the Introduction and Implementation of Systemic Change in the Nigerian Primary School System," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    16. Christofi, Michael & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis & Shams, S.M. Riad, 2019. "Triggering technological innovation through cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A micro-foundational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 148-166.
    17. Alpenberg, Jan & Scarbrough, D. Paul, 2021. "Practice theory in a collaborative context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 415-422.
    18. Shameen Prashantham & Mark P. Healey, 2022. "Strategy as Practice Research: Reflections on its Rationale, Approach, and Contributions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(8), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Kimberly D. Elsbach & Daan van Knippenberg, 2020. "Creating High‐Impact Literature Reviews: An Argument for ‘Integrative Reviews’," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1277-1289, September.
    20. Bertrand Valiorgue & Xavier Hollandts, 2020. "La contribution des administrateurs à la fabrique de la gouvernance dans les coopératives agricoles, le cas Limagrain," Post-Print hal-03041029, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04487398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.