IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04209199.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financement participatif de l’entrepreneuriat durable - une théorie postmoderne du portefeuille de Markowitz

Author

Listed:
  • Gilbert Giacomoni

    (UMR PSAE - Paris-Saclay Applied Economics - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, Fundazione Università di Corsica - Chaire Mutations et Innovations Territoriales, Università di Corsica Pasquale Paoli [Université de Corse Pascal Paoli] - Partenaires INRAE)

Abstract

Die nachhaltige Finanzwirtschaft berücksichtigt bei Investitionsentscheidungen in gewissem Maße ökologische, soziale und Governance-Erwägungen. Sie will dem Gemeinwohl dienen, stößt jedoch auf ein theoretisches Vakuum: Das grundlegende Konzept des Gemeinnutzens ist nicht definiert und kann nicht wirtschaftlich gehandhabt werden. Standardmäßig ist das, was mit dem Gemeinwohl zu tun hat, außerfinanziell, unwissend (d.h. nicht professionell) oder sogar außerhalb der institutionellen Bankkreisläufe, wie z.B. Crowdfunding. Ziel des Artikels ist es, die Argumentation und das Entscheidungsverhalten von erfahrenen und nicht-erfahrenen Geldgebern auf einer einheitlichen theoretischen Grundlage unter verhaltensökonomischen Gesichtspunkten zu modellieren, wobei der Gemeinnutzen die Zufriedenheit (vs. Unzufriedenheit) oder das Wohlbefinden (vs. Unwohlsein) misst, die eine größere Anzahl von Menschen aus dem Konsum oder der Erlangung von Gemeinwohl durch eine kleinere Anzahl von Menschen zieht. Er ist daher relativ zu verstehen, als ein ursprünglicher Nutzen aus einer Zeit, in der dies Teil des Überlebens der Spezies war und das Eigentum noch nicht begonnen hatte, das Gemeinwohl zu bedrohen und seinen Untergang herbeizuführen (Tragedy of the commons). Durch die Verknüpfung mit der modernen Portfoliotheorie von Markowitz (1952) entsteht eine postmoderne Version, die im Dienste einer nachhaltigen Finanzwirtschaft steht und im Bereich des nachhaltigen Unternehmertums erprobt wurde.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilbert Giacomoni, 2023. "Financement participatif de l’entrepreneuriat durable - une théorie postmoderne du portefeuille de Markowitz," Post-Print hal-04209199, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04209199
    DOI: 10.3917/mss.035.0164
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04209199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04209199/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/mss.035.0164?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul S. Adler & Seok-Woo Kwon & Charles Heckscher, 2008. "Perspective---Professional Work: The Emergence of Collaborative Community," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 359-376, April.
    2. Claudia U. Ciborra, 1996. "The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 103-118, April.
    3. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    4. M. Cornu & Fabienne Orsi & J. Rochfeld, 2021. "Dictionnaire des biens communs," Post-Print hal-03340244, HAL.
    5. Paul S. Adler, 2001. "Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 215-234, April.
    6. Christian Felber & Vanessa Campos & Joan R. Sanchis, 2019. "The Common Good Balance Sheet, an Adequate Tool to Capture Non-Financials?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Jean-Pierre Boissin & Alain Fayolle & Karim Messeghem, 2012. "Renforcer notre conception collective de la connaissance entrepreneuriale," Revue de l'Entrepreneuriat, De Boeck Université, vol. 11(2), pages 7-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Kipping & Ian Kirkpatrick, 2013. "Alternative Pathways of Change in Professional Services Firms: The Case of Management Consulting," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 777-807, July.
    2. Benjamin Cabanes & Pascal Le Masson & Benoît Weil, 2020. "Organiser la création de connaissance pour l’innovation de rupture. Des communautés aux sociétés proto-épistémiques d’experts," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(3), pages 35-60.
    3. Vestal, Alex & Danneels, Erwin, 2018. "Knowledge exchange in clusters: The contingent role of regional inventive concentration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1887-1903.
    4. Vegard Kolbjørnsrud, 2018. "Collaborative organizational forms: on communities, crowds, and new hybrids," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Michel Pendaries & Hector Castaneda, 2015. "Assessing Trust Capital in a Potential Technological Co-Innovation Partnership," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 14(2), pages 145-157, December.
    6. Jan Frederic Nerbel & Markus Kreutzer, 2023. "Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Frank Martela, 2019. "What makes self-managing organizations novel? Comparing how Weberian bureaucracy, Mintzberg’s adhocracy, and self-organizing solve six fundamental problems of organizing," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    9. Delin Zeng & Jingbo Hu & Taohua Ouyang, 2017. "Managing Innovation Paradox in the Sustainable Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Ambidextrous Capability in a Focal Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Arvind Ashta & Djamchid Assadi, 2009. "An Analysis of European Online micro-lending Websites," Working Papers CEB 09-059.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & Maria Chiara Guardo & Bo Cowgill, 2017. "Multiplicative-innovation synergies: tests in technological acquisitions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1212-1233, October.
    13. Elizabeth J. Altman & Frank Nagle & Michael L. Tushman, 2013. "Innovating Without Information Constraints: Organizations, Communities, and Innovation When Information Costs Approach Zero," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-043, Harvard Business School, revised Sep 2014.
    14. Parinov, Sergey, 2022. "Micro-level description of the economic coordination," MPRA Paper 114816, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Isabel Miralles & Domenico Dentoni & Stefano Pascucci, 2017. "Understanding the organization of sharing economy in agri-food systems: evidence from alternative food networks in Valencia," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 833-854, December.
    16. Sulin Ba & Jan Stallaert & Andrew B. Whinston, 2001. "Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design—The Case for Incentive Alignment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 225-239, September.
    17. Natalya Yu. VLASOVA & Elena L. MOLOKOVA, 2019. "Mechanisms for coordinating stakeholders of the higher education market: Theoretical approaches to identification," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 21-30, May.
    18. Siripitakchai, Naparat & Miyazaki, Kumiko & Ho, Jonathan C., 2015. "Partnership ecosystem of IC design service companies: The case of Taiwan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 199-208.
    19. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Jing Chen, 2017. "Exploring Performance Determinants of China’s Cable Operators and OTT Service Providers in the Era of Digital Convergence—From the Perspective of an Industry Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Suzanne G. Tilleman & Michael V. Russo & Andrew J. Nelson, 2020. "Institutional Logics and Technology Development: Evidence from the Wind and Solar Energy Industries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 649-670, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04209199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.