IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03484686.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

License to Heal : Understanding a Healthcare Platform Organization as a Multi-Level Surveillant Assemblage

Author

Listed:
  • Handan Vicdan

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Mar Pérezts
  • A. Fuat Firat

Abstract

Platform organizations bring renewed attention to power disparities and risks in the rise of surveillance capitalism. However, such critical accounts provide a partial understanding of the complexity of surveillance phenomena in such shifting socio-technical and digital environments. Findings from a netnographic investigation of a healthcare platform organization, PatientsLikeMe, unravel how platforms become the locus where multi-level flows of surveillance converge, thereby constituting what we identify as a surveillant assemblage. We develop a comprehensive approach for understanding how platforms constitute a dynamic crossroads of micro, meso and macro surveillance phenomena within and beyond the online communities they create. Our study highlights this surveillant assemblage's emerging practices and potentially empowering outcomes that enable multi-stakeholder involvement in big data and knowledge generation in healthcare. Broader implications of multi-level surveillance in and through platforms are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Handan Vicdan & Mar Pérezts & A. Fuat Firat, 2021. "License to Heal : Understanding a Healthcare Platform Organization as a Multi-Level Surveillant Assemblage," Post-Print hal-03484686, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03484686
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03484686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03484686/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brivot, Marion & Gendron, Yves, 2011. "Beyond panopticism: On the ramifications of surveillance in a contemporary professional setting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 135-155, April.
    2. Benjamin Taupin, 2019. "The role of nonhuman entities in institutional work: the case of the ocean in a surfing-centered local economy," Post-Print hal-02445318, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maran, Laura & Bracci, Enrico & Funnell, Warwick, 2016. "Accounting and the management of power: Napoleon’s occupation of the commune of Ferrara (1796–1799)," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 60-78.
    2. Héloïse Berkowitz & Hélène Delacour, 2020. "Sustainable Academia: Open, Engaged, and Slow Science," Post-Print hal-02527707, HAL.
    3. Handan Vicdan & Mar Perezts, & A. Fuat Firat, 2021. "License to heal: Understanding a healthcare Platform Organization as a Multi-level Surveillant Assemblage," Post-Print hal-03173184, HAL.
    4. Beau, Pauline & Jerman, Lambert, 2022. "Bonding forged in “auditing hell”: The emotional qualities of Big Four auditors," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Duval, Anne-Marie & Gendron, Yves & Roux-Dufort, Christophe, 2015. "Exhibiting nongovernmental organizations: Reifying the performance discourse through framing power," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 31-53.
    6. Ingrid Fasshauer, 2019. "La Construction De La Personne Agee Dependante En Ehpad," Post-Print hal-03254511, HAL.
    7. Stenka, Renata & Jaworska, Sylvia, 2019. "The use of made-up users," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Norton, Simon D., 2018. "Suspicion of money laundering reporting obligations: Auditor compliance, or sceptical failure to engage?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 56-66.
    9. Amaury Grimand, 2016. "La prolifération des outils de gestion : quel espace pour les acteurs entre contrainte et habilitation ?," Post-Print hal-04472107, HAL.
    10. Abraham, Santhosh & Bamber, Matthew, 2017. "The Q&A: Under surveillance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 15-31.
    11. Amaury Grimand & Ewan Oiry & Aurélien Ragaigne, 2015. "Is ambidexterity a way of managing paradoxes? Lessons from a multiple-case study," Post-Print hal-04474481, HAL.
    12. Chandra, Shalini & Shirish, Anuragini & Srivastava, Shirish C., 2020. "Theorizing technological spatial intrusion for ICT enabled employee innovation: The mediating role of perceived usefulness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Boll, Karen, 2014. "Shady car dealings and taxing work practices: An ethnography of a tax audit process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-19.
    14. Aurélien Ragaigne & Ewan Oiry & Amaury Grimand, 2014. "Constrain and Empower: The Dual Dimension of Control Tools [Contraindre et habiliter : la double dimension des outils de contrôle]," Post-Print hal-01940529, HAL.
    15. Berlinski, Elise & Morales, Jérémy, 2024. "Digital technologies and accounting quantification: The emergence of two divergent knowledge templates," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte & Iain Munro & Yesh Nama & Robin Holt, 2021. "Control and Surveillance in Work Practice: Cultivating Paradox in ‘New’ Modes of Organizing," Post-Print hal-03268925, HAL.
    17. Handan Vicdan & Mar Pérezts & A. Fuat Firat, 2021. "License to heal : Understanding a healthcare Platform Organization as a Multi-level Surveillant Assemblage," Post-Print hal-03207191, HAL.
    18. Maroun, Warren & Duboisée de Ricquebourg, Alan, 2024. "How auditors identify and report key audit matters - An organizational routines perspective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    19. Brivot Marion, 2011. "Trust in Freedom or in Equality? A Comment on Bernard E. Harcourt's The Illusion of Free Markets," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-10, November.
    20. Aziza Laguecir & Bernard Leca, 2018. "Strategies of visibility in contemporary surveillance settings: Insights from misconduct concealment in financial markets, Critical Perspectives on Accounting," Post-Print hal-01914996, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multi-level surveillance; surveillant assemblage; Platform organization; netnography; healthcare;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03484686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.