IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03335938.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regard critique sur l’appréhension du risque en finance de marché. Une tendance à demander pardon plutôt que la permission

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Laffort

    (CREG - Centre de recherche et d'études en gestion - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)

Abstract

La finance moderne se déroule dans un monde magnifiquement bien dessiné. Dansun formidable élan impulsé à partir du début des années 50 et jamais démenti depuis, ce domaine se dote d'outils puissants et se sophistique pour offrir les meilleurs services et produire les meilleurs résultats. Depuis, la connaissance du risque est une condition d'exercice de la finance : elle n'a plus de sens sans lui. N'y-a-t ‘il pas ici un paradoxe ? alors que nous savons maintenant que le risque est consubstantiel à la finance, que notre savoir et nos outils progressent, les crises financières sont plus rapprochées et plus profondes… Après un bref historique de la prise en compte du risque dans la finance moderne, ce chapitre apporte des explications concernant les causes de négligences dans la prise en compte du risque en dépit de son caractère déterminant. Nous examinons ensuite les excès d'une telle situation en illustrant de faits empruntés à l'actualité récente. Enfin, nous proposons des pistes de réflexion pour penser une pratique plus responsable de la finance qui redonne sens et profondeur à cette notion de risque qu'elle "adresserait" en connaissance des conséquences.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Laffort, 2016. "Regard critique sur l’appréhension du risque en finance de marché. Une tendance à demander pardon plutôt que la permission," Post-Print hal-03335938, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03335938
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03335938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03335938/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacques Barraux, 2013. "Éditorial. La confiance ou la soumission," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(2), pages 7-8.
    2. David Tuckett, 2011. "Minding the Markets," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-30782-7, December.
    3. Emmanuel Laffort & Emmanuelle Cargnello-Charles, 2014. "La balance appropriative comme outil de réduction du risque de fraude en finance de marché," Post-Print hal-03335894, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dow Alexander & Dow Sheila C., 2011. "Animal Spirits Revisited," Capitalism and Society, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Munday, Tim & Brookes, James, 2021. "Mark my words: the transmission of central bank communication to the general public via the print media," Bank of England working papers 944, Bank of England.
    3. Emmanuel Laffort & Emmanuelle Cargnello-Charles, 2014. "Reducing the Risk of Fraud in Financial Market: Psychosocial Drivers and Enactment-Based Perspective," Post-Print hal-02010166, HAL.
    4. Johnson, Samuel G. B., 2019. "Toward a cognitive science of markets: Economic agents as sense-makers," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 13, pages 1-29.
    5. Bronk, Richard & Beckert, Jens, 2022. "The instability of preferences: Uncertain futures and the incommensurable and intersubjective nature of value(s)," MPIfG Discussion Paper 22/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. Ali Kabiri & Harold James & John Landon-Lane & David Tuckett & Rickard Nyman, 2020. "The Role of Sentiment in the Economy: 1920 to 1934," CESifo Working Paper Series 8336, CESifo.
    7. Raquib Zaman, 2014. "Financial market operations in the United States: ethical issues and lessons for Islamic banking," Chapters, in: Mervyn K. Lewis & Mohamed Ariff & Shamsher Mohamad (ed.), Risk and Regulation of Islamic Banking, chapter 12, pages 206-224, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Aikman, David & Haldane, Andrew & Hinterschweiger, Marc & Kapadia, Sujit, 2018. "Rethinking financial stability," Bank of England working papers 712, Bank of England.
    9. Nicolas Dufour & Emmanuel Laffort, 2016. "De la fraude en question à la question de la fraude. Un complément de revue de littérature," Post-Print hal-03335921, HAL.
    10. Victoria Chick, 2013. "The future is open: on open-system theorising in economics," Chapters, in: Jesper Jespersen & Mogens Ove Madsen (ed.), Teaching Post Keynesian Economics, chapter 3, pages 56-72, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Tuckett, David, 2012. "Financial markets are markets in stories: Some possible advantages of using interviews to supplement existing economic data sources," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 1077-1087.
    12. Daniele Vignoli & Raffaele Guetto & Giacomo Bazzani & Elena Pirani & Alessandra Minello, 2020. "Economic Uncertainty and Fertility in Europe: Narratives of the Future," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2020_01, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    13. Michelle Baddeley, 2017. "Keynes’ psychology and behavioural macroeconomics: Theory and policy," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(2), pages 177-196, June.
    14. Bovensiepen, Judith & Pelkmans, Mathijs, 2020. "Dynamics of wilful blindness: an introduction," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104404, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Johnson, Samuel G. B., 2019. "Toward a cognitive science of markets: Economic agents as sense-makers," Economics Discussion Papers 2019-10, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Nyman, Rickard & Kapadia, Sujit & Tuckett, David, 2021. "News and narratives in financial systems: Exploiting big data for systemic risk assessment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. van Toor, Joris, 2017. "Essays on finance : Drivers of bank performance and the international cost of equity," Other publications TiSEM b607ab44-1bca-4f68-8ce9-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Richard Bronk & Wade Jacoby, 2020. "The epistemics of populism and the politics of uncertainty," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 152, European Institute, LSE.
    19. David Tucket & Antoine Mandel & Diana Mangalagiu & Allen Abramson & Jochen Hinkel & Konstantinos Katsikopoulos & Alan Kirman & Thierry Malleret & Igor Mozetic & Paul Ormerod & Robert Elliot Smith & To, 2015. "Uncertainty, Decision Science, and Policy Making: A Manifesto for a Research Agenda," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-02057279, HAL.
    20. repec:hal:pseose:hal-02057279 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Vogel, Harold L. & Werner, Richard A., 2015. "An analytical review of volatility metrics for bubbles and crashes," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 15-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03335938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.