IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03328163.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The new paternalism? The workplace as a place to work-and to live

Author

Listed:
  • Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte

    (LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This study aims to better understand the modern evolution of the workplace not only as a place to work but also increasingly as a place to live. Current research largely excludes the instrumental aspects of this blurring of personal and professional spheres at work, as manifested in an intentional dissolution of the boundaries between work and non-work activities. To understand the meaning and implications of these new workplaces, which rely on a central tension between care and control and tend to reinterpret paternalism as an organizing principle, this study develops a conceptual framework derived from Michel Foucault's concept of pastoral power. This framework helps make sense of a caring mode of power that marks modern organizations. The application of this framework-using a qualitative case study of a French company's home-like working environment-suggests a processual and constructivist conceptualization of these workplaces as a manifestation of pastoral power, embedded in a broader governmentality strategy. It emphasizes the material and discursive construction of the workplace as a place to live and highlights the emergence of neo-paternalism as a new form of care and control. This critical perspective informs discussion on the implications of this caring mode of control for workers, in a hopeful call to stay alert to modern capitalist intrigues.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2021. "The new paternalism? The workplace as a place to work-and to live," Post-Print hal-03328163, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03328163
    DOI: 10.1177/13505084211015374
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03328163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03328163/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13505084211015374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanley Deetz, 1996. "Crossroads---Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 191-207, April.
    2. Bénédicte Vidaillet & Youcef Bousalham, 2020. "Coworking spaces as places where economic diversity can be articulated: Towards a theory of syntopia," Post-Print hal-02180712, HAL.
    3. Bénédicte Vidaillet & Youcef Bousalham, 2020. "Coworking spaces as places where economic diversity can be articulated: Towards a theory of syntopia," Post-Print hal-02460817, HAL.
    4. Tae Wan Kim, 2018. "Gamification of Labor and the Charge of Exploitation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 27-39, September.
    5. De Paoli, Donatella & Sauer, Erika & Ropo, Arja, 2019. "The spatial context of organizations: A critique of ‘creative workspaces’," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 331-352, March.
    6. De Paoli, Donatella & Sauer, Erika & Ropo, Arja, 2019. "The spatial context of organizations: A critique of ‘creative workspaces’ – CORRIGENDUM," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 353-353, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elisabeth Nöhammer, 2022. "Meaning, Needs, and Workplace Spirituality," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nada Endrissat & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2021. "From sites to vibes: Technology and the spatial production of coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03332209, HAL.
    2. Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, 2021. "Do coworking spaces promise a revolution or spark revenge? A Foucauldian spatio-material approach to the re-spatialization of remote work in coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03330208, HAL.
    3. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2021. "What Do We Know about Co-Working Spaces? Trends and Challenges Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    4. Iris Vilnai-Yavetz & Anat Rafaeli, 2021. "Workspace Integration and Sustainability: Linking the Symbolic and Social Affordances of the Workspace to Employee Wellbeing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Andreas Reuschl & Victor Tiberius & Matthias Filser & Yixin Qiu, 2022. "Value configurations in sharing economy business models," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 89-112, January.
    6. Mark G. Edwards, 2014. "Misunderstanding Metatheorizing," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 720-744, November.
    7. Mats Alvesson & Jörgen Sandberg, 2020. "The Problematizing Review: A Counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg’s Argument for Integrative Reviews," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1290-1304, September.
    8. Smith, Aaron C.T. & Stewart, Bob & Oliver-Bennetts, Sunny & McDonald, Sharyn & Ingerson, Lynley & Anderson, Alastair & Dickson, Geoff & Emery, Paul & Graetz, Fiona, 2010. "Contextual influences and athlete attitudes to drugs in sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 181-197, August.
    9. Marc Schlömmer & Teresa Spieß & Stephan Schlögl, 2021. "Leaderboard Positions and Stress—Experimental Investigations into an Element of Gamification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Juha Kettunen, 2016. "Relationship Between Mission Statement And Scope Of Business: Evidence From Finland," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(1), pages 69-78.
    11. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, Aurélie, 2021. "“Seeing to be seen”: The manager’s political economy of visibility in new ways of working," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 605-616.
    12. Craig Reeves & Matthew Sinnicks, 2024. "Totally Administered Heteronomy: Adorno on Work, Leisure, and Politics in the Age of Digital Capitalism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(2), pages 285-301, August.
    13. Maryeme EL HAMMOUCHI, 2024. "Promoting an E-Learning Culture: Exploratory Study of Different Organizational Approaches," GATR Journals gjbssr646, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    14. Bernardo Batiz-Lazo & Kassa Woldesenbet, 2006. "The dynamics of product and process innovations in UK banking," International Journal of Financial Services Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 400-421.
    15. Matthias Huehn, 2008. "Paradigms in Management," Working Papers 9, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    16. Leonel Prieto, 2018. "Leadership Multiplicities before and during the Post-Truth Era," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Lundmark, Erik & Milanov, Hana & Seigner, Benedikt David Christian, 2022. "Can it be measured? A quantitative assessment of critiques of the entrepreneurship literature," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    18. Stephan Grapentin & Maureen Ayikoru, 2019. "Destination Assessment and Certification: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-24, July.
    19. Z Zhu, 2011. "After paradim: why mixing-methodology theorising fails and how to make it work again," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 784-798, April.
    20. Izhak Berkovich, 2018. "Beyond qualitative/quantitative structuralism: the positivist qualitative research and the paradigmatic disclaimer," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2063-2077, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Workplace; Michel Foucault; pastoral power; governmentality; home-like workplace; work-life boundary; space; paternalism; care and control;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03328163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.