IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03227049.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cultural metaphors and KMS appropriation: drawing on Astérix to understand non-use in a large French company

Author

Listed:
  • Aurélie Dudézert

    (LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], IMT-BS - TIM - Département Technologies, Information & Management - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Nathalie Mitev

    (DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ERCIS - European Research Center for Information Systems [Münster] - WWU - Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster = University of Münster)

  • Ewan Oiry

    (ESG UQAM - Département de management et de technologie - UQAM - Université du Québec à Montréal = University of Québec in Montréal, CEREGE [Poitiers, La Rochelle] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université)

Abstract

Management research is increasingly using fiction as an insightful way to analyze complex organizational dynamics. Focusing on user appropriation of Knowledge Management Systems, we describe how we used the popular Astérix, a well-known French cartoon to better understand KMS appropriation. We came to use this approach in an action research project in a large French construction firm initially designed to help Chief Knowledge Officers address KMS non-use. After our first findings showed paradoxical cultural issues, and based on the idea that culture is central to sensemaking and appropriation, we used the notion of the cultural metaphor to help better understand the cultural aspects associated with KMS appropriation. These results contribute knowledge in three different areas. First, we underline the role of cultural metaphors in information systems appropriation. Second, we enrich the literature on the role of fiction in management by illustrating the role of cultural metaphors. Third, we report on how this can be used in an action research project to help better understand KMS appropriation issues, which has the potential of leading to practical managerial action.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurélie Dudézert & Nathalie Mitev & Ewan Oiry, 2021. "Cultural metaphors and KMS appropriation: drawing on Astérix to understand non-use in a large French company," Post-Print hal-03227049, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03227049
    DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100352
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03227049v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03227049v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Spee & Paula Jarzabkowski, 2017. "Agreeing on What? Creating Joint Accounts of Strategic Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 152-176, February.
    2. François-Xavier de Vaujany, 2006. "Pour une théorie de l'appropriation des outils de gestion : vers un dépassement de l'opposition conception-usage," Post-Print halshs-03725356, HAL.
    3. Aurélie Dudezert & Dorothy E Leidner, 2011. "Illusions of control and social domination strategies in knowledge mapping system use," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 574-588, September.
    4. Claude Paraponaris & Jean-Louis Ermine & Claude Guittard & Pascal Lièvre, 2012. "Knowledge management in a French research community: a case study of GeCSO congress," Post-Print hal-01119721, HAL.
    5. Robert M. Mason, 2003. "Culture-Free or Culture-Bound? A Boundary Spanning Perspective on Learning in Knowledge Management Systems," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 11(4), pages 20-36, October.
    6. Dongsong Zhang & Paul Benjamin Lowry, 2008. "Issues, Limitations, and Opportunities in Cross-Cultural Research on Collaborative Software in Information Systems," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 16(1), pages 61-84, January.
    7. Michael Twum-Darko & Lee-Anne Lesley Harker, 2017. "Understanding Knowledge Sharing in an Organization: A Perspective of Actor-Network Theory," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 53-74, January.
    8. Wanda J Orlikowski, 2006. "Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 460-466, October.
    9. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2000. "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 404-428, August.
    10. Christopher P. Furner & Robert M. Mason & Nikhil Mehta & Timothy P. Munyon & Robert Zinko, 2009. "Cultural Determinants of Leaning Effectiveness from Knowledge Management Systems: A Multinational Investigation," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 30-51, January.
    11. R Baskerville & A T Wood-Harper, 1998. "Diversity in information systems action research methods," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 90-107, June.
    12. Shane, Scott, 1993. "Cultural influences on national rates of innovation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 59-73, January.
    13. Aurélie Dudézert & Pierre Prével & Kelly Sellin, 2016. "Manager avec efficacité les connaissances de votre entreprise," Post-Print hal-02973739, HAL.
    14. Steel, Piers & Taras, Vasyl, 2010. "Culture as a consequence: A multi-level multivariate meta-analysis of the effects of individual and country characteristics on work-related cultural values," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 211-233, September.
    15. Myriam Karoui & Aurélie Dudézert & Dorothy E. Leidner, 2015. "Strategies and symbolism in the adoption of organizational social networking systems," Post-Print hal-01340336, HAL.
    16. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2010. "The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 125-141, January.
    17. Aurelie Dudezert & Leidner E. Dorothy, 2011. "Illusions of control and social domination strategies in knowledge mapping system use," Post-Print hal-00832837, HAL.
    18. Daniel G Andriessen, 2008. "Stuff or love? How metaphors direct our efforts to manage knowledge in organisations," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 5-12, March.
    19. François Xavier de Vaujany, 2006. "Pour une théorie de l'appropriation des outils de gestion : vers un dépassement de l'opposition conception-usage," Post-Print halshs-03700202, HAL.
    20. Ojelanki Ngwenyama & Peter Axel Nielsen, 2014. "Using organizational influence processes to overcome IS implementation barriers: lessons from a longitudinal case study of SPI implementation," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 205-222, March.
    21. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1992. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 398-427, August.
    22. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1996. "Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 63-92, March.
    23. Carl Lawrence, 2013. "A Holistic Narrative of Culture's Mediation of Information Systems Innovation: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 31-52, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dragos Vieru & Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin, 2016. "Sharing Knowledge in a Shared Services Center Context: An Explanatory Case Study of the Dialectics of Formal and Informal Practices," Post-Print hal-01458031, HAL.
    2. Stephen R. Barley & Debra E. Meyerson & Stine Grodal, 2011. "E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 887-906, August.
    3. Adhikari, Pawan & Upadhaya, Bedanand & Wijethilake, Chaminda & Dhakal Adhikari, Shovita, 2023. "The sociomateriality of digitalisation in Nepalese NGOs," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    4. Paula Jarzabkowski & Sarah Kaplan, 2015. "Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 537-558, April.
    5. Khuong, Le-Nguyen & Harindranath, G. & Dyerson, Romano, 2014. "Understanding knowledge management software-organisation misalignments from an institutional perspective: A case study of a global IT-management consultancy firm," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 226-247.
    6. Henri Barki & Ryad Titah & Céline Boffo, 2007. "Information System Use--Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 173-192, June.
    7. Simpson, Ace Volkmann & Cunha, Miguel Pina e & Clegg, Stewart, 2015. "Hybridity, sociomateriality and compassion: What happens when a river floods and a city's organizations respond?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 375-386.
    8. Galadriele Ulmer & Jessie Pallud & Michel Kalika, 2012. "Quel Avenir pour l’Après : la continuité d’usage des systèmes d’information collaboratifs," Post-Print hal-01664085, HAL.
    9. Robert G. Fichman, 2004. "Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 132-154, June.
    10. Olivier Desplebin & Gulliver Lux, 2018. "The evolution of accounting, control, audit and their practices through the prism of the Blockchain: a prospective reflection [L'évolution de la comptabilité, du contrôle, de l'audit et de leurs mé," Post-Print hal-01907902, HAL.
    11. Adel Beldi & Walid Cheffi & Frédéric Wacheux, 2006. "L'utilisation de l'information comptable par les managers. Proposition d'une grille d'analyse fondée sur la théorie de la structuration," Post-Print halshs-00548085, HAL.
    12. Anne-Sophie Volz-Tollet & Anne-Laure Delaunay, 2023. "Mobilities and immobilities in industrial organizations: the introduction of digital tools in managerial activity [Mobilités et immobilités dans les organisations industrielles : l'introduction des," Post-Print hal-04120537, HAL.
    13. Luciana Cingolani & Tim Hildebrandt, 2022. "Incentive Structures for the Adoption of Crowdsourcing in Public Policy: A Bureaucratic Politics Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Josh Whitford & Francesco Zirpoli, 2014. "Pragmatism, Practice, and the Boundaries of Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1823-1839, December.
    15. Marie-Claude Boudreau & Daniel Robey, 2005. "Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 3-18, February.
    16. Paula A. Jarzabkowski & Jane K. Lê & Martha S. Feldman, 2012. "Toward a Theory of Coordinating: Creating Coordinating Mechanisms in Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 907-927, August.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9548 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Vladislav Fomin & Kalle Lyytinen & Stefan Haefliger, 2013. "Sociomaterial regulation in organizations: The case of information technology," Post-Print hal-01648122, HAL.
    19. Martha S. Feldman, 2004. "Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 295-309, June.
    20. Dragos Vieru & Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin, 2016. "Sharing Knowledge in a Shared Services Center Context: An Explanatory Case Study of the Dialectics of Formal and Informal Practices," Post-Print hal-01292702, HAL.
    21. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03227049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.